Sadly for theory, the Qur'an was received by Mohammed (peace be upon him) in the 7th century. The Inquisition was 15th century. Nasty people those Spanish. Particularly the comfy chair.
Carry on with the usual disinformation
Meade
Search found 20795 matches
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:34 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: Only in the UK....
- Replies: 18
- Views: 1561
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:21 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: Wrestling with his faith
- Replies: 72
- Views: 5148
Re: Wrestling with his faith
I suppose that it’s correct to say that most of the people on this board are, in the main, supportive of a somewhat relativistic viewpoint. People are entitled to their own beliefs – I may not agree with them but I respect their right to have them. One may disagree with a person’s Buddhist notions b...
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:26 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
Here's the problem (again): If a thing does not happen given infinite time in which to happen, then it is an impossible thing That is a leap, not a logical progression. "Impossible" means that it cannot happen. But you keep substituting "does not" for "cannot". How do you justify that leap? Well An...
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 5:53 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
I have already provided the argument which you merely contradict. An impossible thing is that which can never happen A possible thing is that which can happen A possible thing can only happen in time and there is no time greater than "infinite time" If a thing does not happen given infinite time in ...
- Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:49 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: Wrestling with his faith
- Replies: 72
- Views: 5148
Re: Wrestling with his faith
Ha ha. Ho Ho. A lot of funny stuff there. But the boy did the correct thing. He is to be commended for upholding a principle. (Look it up) Females have no business wrestling males. In a wrestling contest. Any more than female "boxers" should be allowed into the ring with male boxers. I don't agree w...
- Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:35 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
You chickens!
- Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:50 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
There is no problem with it per se, lo. It is just that christianity seems to claim that a lot of the stuff in their bible is fact when it was actually borrowed from other, far older religions. For example, if it can be demonstrated that, say, 5 key points about Christ's life (eg born in humble sur...
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 6:06 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
There is a simple reason why 9999999999999999999999999 or even 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 millennia can not be approximated to infinite time. The fact that we can ennumerate it means that it is incomparable to infinity. But of course the real point is not that a "probable" thing ...
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:47 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
This summarizes the agnostic problem - an outright refusal to stand on any ground at all other than scepticism. Yes AGD you have made a claim. You claim that in inifinite time not all possible things may happen. You did not simply ask "what is your argument? - you first said that it was not correct ...
- Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:31 pm
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
I think this thread is one size of infinity.
- Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:28 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
Claiming that in an infinite span of time all events which have even the smallest probability of happening must necessarily happen is a bizarre misunderstanding of nature and frankly just wrong. The chance that all of the water molecules in lake tahoe will at some point vibrate in exactly the same ...
- Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:42 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: Christain Science book
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1130
Re: Christain Science book
Let's hope not!
- Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:37 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
Sean If that is the case, then it is equally not an absolute certainty that he will roll a 5. Or a 4, Or a 3. Or a 2. Or a 1. Which leaves us uncertain as to whether the die will ever stop rolling? Put another way. You are saying that in infinite time it is certain he will roll 5 numbers but not cer...
- Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:47 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
Andrew Well done - seized on the word "could" which is no doubt an error. Thestoat meant "will". The rationale is this: Given sufficient time (and hardware), the hypothetical monkeys WILL type randomly every possible combination of letters that exists. One of those combinations is "The God Illusion"...
- Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:32 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: Christain Science book
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1130
Re: Christain Science book
That's hilarious! My only complaint is that we didn't get any of Chapter Sixty Nine which has the really dirty stuff!
- Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:15 am
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
There's a wrong thing right there. Re Joshua; not it’s not a “wrong thing” – it’s poetic description of a seemingly endless day of battle. A common device in ancient writings and through to today. Eye for an eye versus turn the other cheek . Not understanding is not the same as contradiction. Eye f...
- Fri Feb 18, 2011 3:42 pm
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
Good stuff If men can be wrong (and maybe have written wrong things in the bible) then how do you know when you read it whether you are reading your god's word, or yet another misinterpretation? Men can be wrong but “wrong things” are not written in the Bible. What is written is not interpretation b...
- Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:25 pm
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
Obviously the Bible itself cannot change – it am what it be. Jefferson’s “no miracles” gospel rather missed the entire point of Christianity. One can readily imagine the derision of atheists (and any thinking Christian) if say, an ecumenical council agreed to rewrite the book of Daniel to remove all...
- Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:28 pm
- Forum: Philosophy and Religion
- Topic: In the beginning ...
- Replies: 475
- Views: 25056
Re: In the beginning ...
Actually, this is one of the few areas where Meade is sort of right (at least the closest Meade gets). Obviously Meade is wrong that the atheist must argue the universe has infinitely existed, but in a system that contains infinite time, everything that can happen will have happened. Of course, the...
- Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:03 am
- Forum: General stuff & Tabloids
- Topic: Wee Julius
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1571
Re: Wee Julius
Did David Ben Ariel drop in for a visit when no one was looking? Contrary to extremist Afrikaaner propaganda, South Africa is not hugely more violent now than it was under apartheid. Violence was just easier to contain (and whites were more insulated from it) when poor, desperate people were largel...