When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

All things related to the general running of the forum - got a suggestion? Here's where it should go.
User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by Lord Jim »

I have never considered Daisy arbitrary or capricious...
I want to echo that and extend it to all the admins involved with this board....

If anything, I think these folks have bent over backwards to be fair and responsive to all the membership here....

Any attempt to draw any sorts of parallels between these folks and what was going on under the non-owner admin at the CSB is completely without merit... There is no comparison.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21221
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Loca

Glad you're back but . . . Give it a rest please. I'll repeat that - please. And don't reply to this anyway. Just stop it

Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by loCAtek »

Sorry, but ..stop what?

I don't put great emphasis on Plan B as central to my life. There was a poll and suddenly I was banned ...without personal notice to myself.


In real life, probation means a letter, an interview, and possibly an assigning of a PO - Probation Officer, just so there's no confusion as to the letter of the law of your conviction. I may only have warrants and a misdemeanor on my record, but I know due process, and it does not mean assumption of anything.
You have to be read your rights in my country.

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by loCAtek »

bigskygal wrote:Start a personal blog as a secondary home for your stuff, lo - you can do so for free & and edit there to your heart's delight.
An excellent example of how past posts aren't recalled by the constituency; as per @w's suggestion, I did start a Blog.
It wasn't well recieved, as the continuity was hard to follow, what with the last post, posted first. Also, I couldn't tell the view count.
Which is why I prefer forums. ;)

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by Gob »

loCAtek wrote:
I don't put great emphasis on Plan B as central to my life. There was a poll and suddenly I was banned ...without personal notice to myself.
.
Without notice? Apart that is from a whole sub-forum where you were given a chance to explain your behaviours and substantiate your accusations, none of which you managed to do.

Oh and without notice, apart from just about every fucking poster here telling you to stop being such an arsehole.

Oh and without warning apart from the multiple warnings you were given, by multiple members here, that your behaviours were totally out of order.

And now you are back, and within two days you have accused Daisy of being on Hen's leash, and had a swipe at "mental health professionals".

You really are too fucking stupid to be trusted to use a toilet properly, aren't you?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21221
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Gob wrote:And now you are back, and within two days you have accused Daisy of being on Hen's leash, and had a swipe at "mental health professionals"
Dear Loca

The above is what I refer to as in "STOP!" In addition to the provocation in this thread, the resurrection of another which served no purpose other than to stir trouble, I also noticed the backhander about 'mental health professionals' and I do not understand at all why you persist in such aggressive (and truth to tell, rather childish) behaviour.

Please for the love of God get over it and give up this petty vendetta

Thank you
Peter

PS and yes, there is probation which will be regulated as Daisy (the arbitrator you trust) designs. But this isn't a good start - you are already setting of the electronic monitor, straying too far from the path, and suspected of carrying firearms with intent to commit faux pas. I plead again - stop this petty bickering and start posting non-vindictive stuff as you used to do
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Daisy
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 9:15 am

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by Daisy »

 For the record and let me make myself utterly and completely clear on this loCA.

I chose to offer mediation of my own volition, no poster coerced or asked me to do anything I wouldn't wish to do.

I felt that I was completely fair by offering a specific and measurable framework for that mediation which was made clear at the outset. And the results of that process is there for all to see.

I then turned it over to the membership to decide if you should be suspended for again a specific and measurable amount of time followed by a specific and measurable probation period to allow you to reintegrate with the forum.

For you to cry foul and to say that you were suspended without notice is unfair on me and the goodwill I have shown you throughout the whole process.

I am posting this both forums as you have chosen to sling mud around in both.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15094
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by Joe Guy »

I truly believe Loca is having blackouts and should seek help before it's too late. Or maybe it is already too late.

How could anyone be given so many chances, have the potential consequence explained so many times and then claim she was given no due process before being suspended (with probation!).

This drama has become a tragedy.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by Lord Jim »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:
Gob wrote:And now you are back, and within two days you have accused Daisy of being on Hen's leash, and had a swipe at "mental health professionals"
Dear Loca

The above is what I refer to as in "STOP!" In addition to the provocation in this thread, the resurrection of another which served no purpose other than to stir trouble, I also noticed the backhander about 'mental health professionals' and I do not understand at all why you persist in such aggressive (and truth to tell, rather childish) behaviour.

Please for the love of God get over it and give up this petty vendetta

Thank you
Peter

PS and yes, there is probation which will be regulated as Daisy (the arbitrator you trust) designs. But this isn't a good start - you are already setting of the electronic monitor, straying too far from the path, and suspected of carrying firearms with intent to commit faux pas. I plead again - stop this petty bickering and start posting non-vindictive stuff as you used to do
Well said that man! :clap: :clap: :clap:
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19680
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

Post by BoSoxGal »

This sucks.

YOU suck, loCA.

If your life outside of Plan B is so all-absorbing, why don't you just stay away?

Nobody here would miss your stories all that much; anyone who does can follow you on eBlogger.

Quit it, PLEASE!
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Post Reply