Something For Discussion (A possible rule)

[Crackpot]

Meade Unfortunately I believe the Administration has a duty to respond to accusations of stalking (even if they're asinine). the problem is Lo is purposely making claims that to the outside observer woud seem very gave indeed leaving us with the catch 22 where ignoring it looks (to the outside observer and we are looking for new posters) like we have a dysfunctional administration and addressing it and feeding the ego of a Drama Queen.

[MajGenl.Meade]

Do you really think ignoring is a valid option at this point in the exchanges? Personally I think it has Ganesh many months too far.

That must be the elephant in the room I suppose?

Well not responding after

by loCAtek » Sun Jun 03, 2012 1:22 am

might have had some utility, but at this stage (since you ask) "no I think it is no longer valid".

I also gave the alternative of "respond and just live with it".

CP - as far as I can see, Loca's come up with some hare-brained statements that someone was "stalking" her and people who live in Australia did not do anything about it before it happened, before they knew about it and before they were born. Since she resolutely refuses to explain what this "stalking" consisted of - and if it means some dude was posting insults after she posted a sweet story about falcons in Iraq taking welding lessons - then even a stranger will recognise twaddle when it wears that bright yellow "Hi! I'm Twaddle" nametag

Meade

[Crackpot]

Yes but that has only come out due to the fact that she was pressed to prove those accusations if it was ignored from the start what would it look like?

[The Hen]

Lo has openly been stalking myself and the Gob for quite sometime and many people are aware of it.

It certainly has become a pain in the butt and many people can substantiate my claim.

Should I ask the Admins to do something about that?

[The Hen]

That must be the elephant in the room I suppose?

No. Just stinking auto-correct biting me again.

[Joe Guy]

Loca has a problem that we can't fix for her.

She is the only one who can control her behavior and she seems to be perfectly happy making no sense and blaming others for her problems.

I'd prefer to see everyone simply ignore her senseless post and respond only to the positive posts.

But I'm not her target and so it's easy for me to say and do.

Do whatever you think is right. I'm sure most of us will support you.

[Gob]

Thanks Joe.

[The Hen]

How was anyone supposed to identify PMSP as your alleged stalker when you never identified her as such when she started posting?

It's called courtesy, which she violated, 'eh?

OK. So we have a stalker who has joined and was not identified as such by you and it is the Admin's fault for not taking action against her?

Do you know for a fact that they haven't taken any action?

If you DO know this, HOW do you know this? Are you in contact with your stalker about her Plan B access?

Are you your stalker? Is that how you know that no action has been taken against her/you?

Your story sounds much like just that. A story.

[MajGenl.Meade]

Lo has openly been stalking myself and the Gob for quite sometime and many people are aware of it.
It certainly has become a pain in the butt and many people can substantiate my claim. Should I ask the Admins to do something about that?

Yes that's true, I believe. But dear Hen your Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:42 am immediately adjacent is just stirring the crap some more without any real need to do so, isn't it? You are inviting loca to start a stalk-mail again

The way I see it

Meade

[Gob]

Which post do you refer to Meade? This thread only goes back to the 6 th.

[MajGenl.Meade]

Let me quote myself: "Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:42 am" and "immediately adjacent"

Earth to Gob (it's JUNE now)

[Andrew D]

And Jay/Mediator just keeps on laughing ....

But nobody wants to know him ....

[Gob]

Let me quote myself: "Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:42 am" and "immediately adjacent"

Earth to Gob (it's JUNE now)

Nope, lost me sorry!

[The Hen]

I am to take it that when accusations are given about my family, I am to turn the other cheek and ignore them?

I am not to also raise an issue that has not been raised if the raiser has not posted whilst I had been asleep or otherwise engaged?

Now that Lo has taken herself off for her little rest period again no more may be added to the thread by myself?

I wonder how many in the real world would do that Meade?

Because you can count me in the number that wouldn't.

I have had it up to the back teeth with the shit she flings in my direction.

I am fed up with having to let it rest when she runs away, and having to ignore the fool she made of herself before when she withdraws, to have her come back with yet ANOTHER attack.

Please do not tell me the issue is over because Lo has left the thread. Do not tell me that I am shit-stirring because I raise an unidentified flaw in her argument.

And BTW, I think the way you see it is flawed.

Thanks.

[MajGenl.Meade]

Hen. Don't get me wrong - she's beyond trying your patience and way into being... well words I won't use. But the post that she made which started the hissy fits was this:

.but worth banning? When, as you said AndrewD, others do far worse, and get no more than a 'tsk tsk'. The far worse is letting a known violent assailant, post 'vile untruths' and 'off-board exchanges' ...all in good fun, since he/she is a fellow Ozzie [supposedly, my Ex is good at ingratiating himself that way]. Admin is happy to break thier word, that they wouldn't let such stalking occur, in the first place. Posting words is NBD, but when it's known that the stalker can/will physically pose a danger; and they are happy to help... ? In my country, it's called accessory to a crime.

A series of people have shown beyond doubt (including you) that this post and all the twisting in the wind follow-ups are delusional and/or calculated (but either way worthless) falsehoods. These responses were valid and showed the bankruptcy of the argument that she made.

It seemed to me in this particular bout that loca took a ten-count and is back in the dressing room. We then move on to a few posts on the OP including your participation adding to the thread - general discussion, OK.

Then suddenly as if all the posts of the last two days hadn't happened, you produce a Loca-poker post begging for her to respond with more b.s. I just don't get why anyone would do that? Her entire 'contribution' is flawed - I don't think it's worth the 'gotcha' to address HER on the matter.

You haven't got her anyway - she's ignoring you and reality both. And yes, the way I see it could be flawed.

Meade

[Lord Jim]

It seemed to me in this particular bout that loca took a ten-count and is back in the dressing room.

Sadly, given the pattern of behavior, "pausing to re-load" is probably a better analogy....

This is an ongoing pattern of behavior, even if there are occasional pauses of a day or two....

Launch a flurry of unjustified (and in some cases flat out bizarre) attacks, then disappear for a couple of days...

Rinse and repeat, with a different line of attack but with the same obsessive targets...

These pauses don't change the fact that the trolling attacks are ongoing....

The ONLY thing that will change this from being ongoing is when LoCa starts coming to the board and posting, WITHOUT launching a new barrage of attacks....

LoCa has demonstrated quite conclusively that she doesn't need any "provocation" to continue these attacks....

She's shown repeatedly that she intends to continue them no matter what anyone else posts or doesn't post....

Until and unless she finally makes the decision to simply cut this out, nothing anyone posts, (not advice, not retorts, not even support... nothing) can be in any way said to provide incentive or justification to keep up with this, since she's made very clear that she doesn't need any incentive or justification to continue this.

[oldr_n_wsr]

Wow. Once again, gone a few days (weeks) and the sh$% piles up. While reading I kept thinking that this thread needs a good dose of alice and I am happy she posted here and always seems to have a firm grasp on what is going on. Maybe not posting so much gives her some kind of objectivity. But I think it goes deeper than that. As long as I have known her she has had an "inate" (sp?) ability to sum up anything and reduce it to it's core. Thanks alice.

Anyway, I have no clue what has been going on but it seems to me that the slogan "do not feed the troll" applies here. From what I have read, every time something is said the Isaac Newton law is observed. "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction".

No need to post "X" in response to "W". Just let "W" lay there. The members of the board can figure out what needs to be disgarded and what needs to be "entertained".

[MajGenl.Meade]

a bit oldr n much wsr

[Scooter]

So easy to take the high road when it isn't you being accused repeatedly of pedophilia, production and distribution of child pornography, criminal facilitation, etc.

[MajGenl.Meade]

It's a bitch to be you I guess When did all that happen to you again - I missed it.....