Fixed that for you.Gob wrote:Exactly true. I have been pissy with you ever since I totally fucked up that Cornish thing.
I remember things one way. You remember them differently. The evidence which would show the truth or falsity of your or my recollection is, through no fault of either of us, unavailable. Therefore, let's just walk away. I cannot prove that you are wrong; you cannot prove that I am wrong. So let's just walk away.
Andrew D wrote:Fixed that for you.Gob wrote:Exactly true. I have been pissy with you ever since I totally fucked up that Cornish thing.
As to definitions, you are the one who ignored the posted dictionary definition of "native language". And came to the idiotic conclusion that I am a Native American.
As to debating skills, my "shitty" is still better than your best.
Get over it.
As have I... ( though I manifestly do not like what she has chosen to do here)...To be clear, I like her
Gob wrote:The old Gob would never have denied what everyone has seen is true.
Fixed those for you.As I say, and proved, I turned into a troll over one year ago.
Hen, I have a wonky mouse (I'll regret saying that) and my post had an error. The words "topic. Loca had" got shifted. The damn thing clicks by itself as it scrolls over the screen - keeps moving words, taking me to other websites, other threads and so on. It makes "Minesweeper" almost impossibleThe Hen wrote:Meade, the comment I made was not 'suddenly' in a thread that was over. My comment was made 17 hours after Lo's last comment (after I had slept and woken), and only 40 minutes after the last post in the thread. I think you are mischaracterizing the thread if you think it was dormant prior to that post of mine that you took so much exception to
The Hen wrote: by The Hen » Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:02 am. Perhaps this is an opportune point to raise the percentage vote for 'category' offences again as a nice segue back to the OP.
The Hen wrote:by The Hen » Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:50 am. Well that stopped that discussion. (Again. I should probably learn something from that.)
Hen - I think "such exception" carries more freight than necessary. All I ever said about the above is that your Jun 04 post was begging for Loca to start up again when even you had said "back to the OP" and "well that stopped that discussion". And dare I add "I should probably learn something from that"The Hen wrote:by The Hen » Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:42 am. Do you know for a fact that they haven't taken any action? If you DO know this, HOW do you know this? Are you in contact with your stalker about her Plan B access? Are you your stalker? Is that how you know that no action has been taken against her/you?
No Gen'l, that is what you need to do...t should read: Hen had already responded to Loca - so had a cast of thousands - it was over and done and the thread was back on topic. Loca had taken herself off to wherever she goes. Suddenly, Hen poked a stick into Loca's face with an open invitation to start up all over again. Read it without the blinkers Jim
I stand absolutely amazed and dumbfounded that anyone familiar with the totality of what has gone on with this could possibly come to such a conclusion...it was over and done
Of course it is.Gob wrote:Ok, well that's the end of that 'discussion " for me.
Huh?The Hen wrote:... should there be a time limit placed on responding when the person thread?
LOLHen's alluding to the fact that she encouraged Loca to post more crap er.... "responded"
oh damn, and I just got the bloody thing fixed....
Oh and there's being in cahoots with the Aussies! ROTFFLMAO. I live in San Jose for fuck's sake. But wait, there was a registration ticket about 15 years ago....must have caught up with me. Call the Police! Now LJ if you want to characterise that as an "accusation" - well it's a free country. And no I don't think I've won over any converts to whatever it was you made up. I never said any such thing. What I said was (see umpteen posts) was that Hen's ONE POST was like poking a sleeping dog. Of course I'd like it if Hen said "Yes that was a bit contrary to what I'd just said wasn't it?" - we all could have gone home hours ago (days). After declaring victoryI actually agreed with your prior conclusion which appears to be the same as my own:
The Hen wrote:
by The Hen » Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:02 am. Perhaps this is an opportune point to raise the percentage vote for 'category' offences again as a nice segue back to the OP.
The Hen wrote:
by The Hen » Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:50 am. Well that stopped that discussion. (Again. I should probably learn something from that.)
The Hen wrote:
by The Hen » Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:42 am. Do you know for a fact that they haven't taken any action? If you DO know this, HOW do you know this? Are you in contact with your stalker about her Plan B access? Are you your stalker? Is that how you know that no action has been taken against her/you?
Hen - I think "such exception" carries more freight than necessary. All I ever said about the above is that your Jun 04 post was begging for Loca to start up again when even you had said "back to the OP" and "well that stopped that discussion".And dare I add "I should probably learn something from that"
