Board agreement.

[Gob]

Though we are against banning, as the latest poll shows, there is one item I feel very strongly about.

I think anyone posting here is fair game, after all our reputations, or lack of them, are defined by our posting here.

Other people, who do not post here are not culpable.

I care not if they are mentioned here, I'm fucking dead proud of my lovely daughter, and why should I not be? If I mention her here or elsewhere, that is nothing more than any good father would and should be able to do.

Others too have love and pride in and for their partners, relatives friends, etc.

That does not make them game for attacks. They are not responsible for what we post her, they should not be used against us.

THAT IS TOTALLY UNFAIR AND REFLECTS VERY BADLY ON THE PERSON DOING IT, IT'S A SIGN OF ETHICAL WEAKNESS, AND LACK OF SKILL IN DEBATE.

For want of a better expression, it's sinking as low as Steve.

I do not think it above us to have an agreement that family, friends, lovers and children are not brought into debate. I think each and every one of us has a duty to condemn it when it occurs.

I'll get down off me soapbox now.

[@meric@nwom@n]

I intend to go as low as Andrew wants to take it.

The gloves are off as far as I am concerned with him.

He has earned no regard and I offer him none.

If he wants to shut his figurative face and post like a human he may earn some regard.

[BoSoxGal]

Thus far @w has merely expressed sympathy for Andrew D's wife in her opinion that Andrew D exhibits here a great many characteristics which could be reasonably construed to be indicative of an abusive personality.

That seems to me to constitute an attack on Andrew D in no way unjustified given his recent - and past - posting behavior.

Do you see it differently, Gob?

I do not see anything remotely akin to Steve's attacks on the Hatch.

[Andrew D]

I intend to go as low as Andrew wants to take it.

The gloves are off as far as I am concerned with him.

He has earned no regard and I offer him none.

If he wants to shut his figurative face and post like a human he may earn some regard.

Come on over, babe.

You obviously know where I live. You found out my wife's name, so you must have found out my address.

So come on over.

We can have a nice dinner.

I don't know your food preferences. We can have a perfectly done steak (courtesy of Q-meister, not me); we can have Indian or Thai or Chinese or generic vegetarian or even vegan. I'm good at all of those.

And afterwards, when we're enjoying our post-prandial coffees, we can put our forearms on the table. One burning cigarette lying on mine; one burning cigarette lying on yours.

I'll look you in the eye the whole time. While our flesh is sizzling.

And when you can't take it any longer, when you wimp out and throw the burning cigarette off to the side, I'll still be looking straight in your eyes. And maybe then you'll start to understand the consequences of fucking with my wife.

Up for it?

Come on. Prove that you're something other than a gutless, lying little bitch whose entire sex life is masturbation.

Show up.

You know where I am. Show up.

Do it.

[BoSoxGal]

Ah, yes.

That's yet another totally rational and proportional response.

[Andrew D]

I'm quite serious.

Anyone want to set it up?

I'll be happy to meet on neutral ground.

And notice that I am not threatening to do anything to her.

Unless one considers remedial education threatening.

[@meric@nwom@n]

I went to bed figuring that his head would explode. It did.

Now back to the regularly scheduled posting.

[quaddriver]

I would agree with you Gob, in fact I espoused the same on the OTHER board.

But that never stopped it.

In fact, like it or not, ONLY people who left there, for here continue to do so and those same people were the only ones who did it there and there was ALWAYS justification.

For example, one thread above this in Andrews 'where is the outrage' thread, Lord Jim CLEARLY states that Andrew deserved it and another poster concurred.

Clean your own house before you climb the box....seriously, and with no malice implied.

[Scooter]

In fact, like it or not, ONLY people who left there, for here continue to do so and those same people were the only ones who did it there and there was ALWAYS justification.

Steve and editec have been posting here? Damn, did I miss it?

[Lord Jim]

In fact, like it or not, ONLY people who left there, for here continue to do so and those same people were the only ones who did it there and there was ALWAYS justification.

Steve and editec have been posting here? Damn, did I miss it?

Scooter, it's the evil cabal on this board that destroyed the CSB. That's why everyone else came here...because they wanted to be with "board destroyers", rather than stay at the CSB with decent and ethical folks like Steve, Gwen and Editec....

To understand how this works, you just need to apply Quadian Logic....

[quaddriver]

In fact, like it or not, ONLY people who left there, for here continue to do so and those same people were the only ones who did it there and there was ALWAYS justification.

Steve and editec have been posting here? Damn, did I miss it?

Scooter, it's the evil cabal on this board that destroyed the CSB. That's why everyone else came here...because they wanted to be with "board destroyers", rather than stay at the CSB with decent and ethical folks like Steve, Gwen and Editec....

To understand how this works, you just need to apply Quadian Logic....

Really? I never learned about Editecs wife dorathy until I heard it from someone HERE who was there

I never learned about Steves ex wife and child until I heard it from someone HERE who was there

I never saw ANYONE call Andrews wife or father out until it was done HERE

I never mention anyone in my family (other than my cop brother) until someone HERE who was THERE did it

Need I go on?

Editec, Gwen and Steve do not have a history of dragging in off board family members* in a derrogatory way. If I am wrong show me the post(s)

And for that matter, when someone states they have a problem and brings it up bargaining in good faith, do the troll trio (or quaduplet with me, or quintuplet with Andrew) bring it up? i.e. Loca, Oldr etc.


* = the asterick is there on purpose and Gob knows damn well why it is.

ps: without mentioning the content of PMs, I have advised every single person who divulged personal information of a troubling nature via PM not to do it as it would be brought up and held against them. I have to date, never been wrong on that count.

[Scooter]

I never learned about bsg's former co-workers until editec brought them up THERE.

I never learned about bsg's ex-boyfriends until editec brought them up THERE.

I never learned about Gob's 15 year old daughter having sex with her mother with Gob watching, until Steve alleged it THERE.

I never learned about Gob and Hen's 15 year old daughter running off with a middle aged neo-Nazi by the name of David Ben Ariel, until Steve alleged it THERE.

I never heard anything about editec's ex-wife until HE chose to drag her into the discussion THERE.

I never heard anything about Steve's ex-wife until HE decided to trash the reputation of the mother of his children THERE.

Need I go on?

[Sean]

I would agree with you Gob, in fact I espoused the same on the OTHER board.

But that never stopped it.

In fact, like it or not, ONLY people who left there, for here continue to do so and those same people were the only ones who did it there and there was ALWAYS justification.

For example, one thread above this in Andrews 'where is the outrage' thread, Lord Jim CLEARLY states that Andrew deserved it and another poster concurred.

Clean your own house before you climb the box....seriously, and with no malice implied.

I think you are a little hard of thinking again Quad. Jim stated nothing of the sort. Try reading his post again...

[Gob]

If you like Quaddy, I can do, as I did at the CSB, search and give you the exact first postings of people's names. Edi's wife's name being posted first by him was proved by Loca.

First mention of Edi's wife's name;

editec
Guest

Signs of spring
« Reply #17 on: February 15, 2003, 11:47:42 AM »

The flat-lander (born and raise in mountains of Pennsylvania) who just installed his first woodstove kind.

Now coal? That I'm prepared to burn like Casey Jones' fire-tender, but wood?

That technology takes some gettin' to know.

Don't want to end up a tinman to my D*r*thy in the first month, ya' know?

Name edited to protect her.

First mention of BSG's name;

Quote from: editec on July 08, 2006, 02:55:34 PM
I'm sorry K*rl*.

I should have not used you name.

Beyond that, I stand by my position.

If you want some man to love you, it going to help if you stop hating men-kind.

[@meric@nwom@n]

If you like Quaddy, I can do, as I did at the CSB, search and give you the exact first postings of people's names. Edi's wife's name being posted first by him was proved by Loca.

First mention of Edi's wife's name;

editec
Guest

Signs of spring
« Reply #17 on: February 15, 2003, 11:47:42 AM »

The flat-lander (born and raise in mountains of Pennsylvania) who just installed his first woodstove kind.

Now coal? That I'm prepared to burn like Casey Jones' fire-tender, but wood?

That technology takes some gettin' to know.

Don't want to end up a tinman to my D*r*thy in the first month, ya' know?

Name edited to protect her.

First mention of BSG's name;

Quote from: editec on July 08, 2006, 02:55:34 PM
I'm sorry K*rl*.

I should have not used you name.

Beyond that, I stand by my position.

If you want some man to love you, it going to help if you stop hating men-kind.

He has a computer and very little but time, and he's not afraid to use them.

[Lord Jim]

I would agree with you Gob, in fact I espoused the same on the OTHER board.

But that never stopped it.

In fact, like it or not, ONLY people who left there, for here continue to do so and those same people were the only ones who did it there and there was ALWAYS justification.

For example, one thread above this in Andrews 'where is the outrage' thread, Lord Jim CLEARLY states that Andrew deserved it and another poster concurred.

Clean your own house before you climb the box....seriously, and with no malice implied.

I think you are a little hard of thinking again Quad. Jim stated nothing of the sort. Try reading his post again...

LMAO

Wow, Quad get's something completely wrong...

Merciful heavens, what next? Sunny days in Death Valley? The Washington Nationals having a losing season?


What Lord Jim said:

I want to say that I believe it is always and everywhere wrong to make fun of someone's deceased parents; (if that's what's happened) no matter how odious the behavior of the target. (That happened to me years ago at the Cafe Darte after my mother passed away from lung cancer)

What Quad saw:

Lord Jim CLEARLY states that Andrew deserved it

Quad should never have hired this guy to read posts to him:



(I will not of course bother to ask him where I stated this "CLEARLY"...or even "UNCLEARLY"... as I know the evidence for that will show up about the same time as all those quotes where I indicated that Rush Limbaugh is my "hero"....and I don't read his posts anyway.)

I did also say this:

But that having been said the fact is that this would not have happened had it not for Andrew's own vicious behavior

And that of course is undeniably true. It is a simple fact that if he hadn't played The Asshole From Hell so many times, towards so many people repeatedly over the course of a full week, the posts that were made last night would never have been made.

But of course, that is not the same thing as saying that he "deserved it"....especially given the fact that I had said it was "always and everywhere wrong no matter how odious the behavior of the target"...maybe it's just me, but that statement looks kind of...uhh...categorical to me....not a whole lot of wiggle room or ambiguity there for multiple interpretation....

Any idiot can see that....

Well, obviously not any idiot....

[BoSoxGal]

And besides which Andrew D's father was not made fun of; @w said he sounded like a 'neat' guy & it was hard to believe his spawn was so contemptible. Loosely recounted; but the gist is the same.

[oldr_n_wsr]

And for that matter, when someone states they have a problem and brings it up bargaining in good faith, do the troll trio (or quaduplet with me, or quintuplet with Andrew) bring it up? i.e. Loca, Oldr etc.

I have called "Bad Form" on any and all mentions of personal info when I saw it. I cannot call it if I don't see.

And with saying "Grow up" in whatever thread (I have no idea which thread is what in the ongoing shit pile) I said that all involved on both sides of the aisle.

[loCAtek]

This is a good start; now that Gob has said and not I, it will probably be heeded. I'm cool w'dat, it's the thought that counts.

[quaddriver]

I never learned about bsg's former co-workers until editec brought them up THERE.

I never learned about bsg's ex-boyfriends until editec brought them up THERE.

I never learned about Gob's 15 year old daughter having sex with her mother with Gob watching, until Steve alleged it THERE.

I never learned about Gob and Hen's 15 year old daughter running off with a middle aged neo-Nazi by the name of David Ben Ariel, until Steve alleged it THERE.

I never heard anything about editec's ex-wife until HE chose to drag her into the discussion THERE.

I never heard anything about Steve's ex-wife until HE decided to trash the reputation of the mother of his children THERE.

Need I go on?

Ok, steve is bad. 1 vs how many? 6 wrongs make steves wrong right?