When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?

[loCAtek]

...and why was no one notified?

For no reason other than grammar, I tried to edit an old 'Alpha Dog' post and found it was frozen. More recent posts seem to be edit-able; so, why the change?

What's the time limit, and why weren't we told about it?

[Sean]

It's a conspiracy I tells ya!

Well Taffdar? What have you got to say for yourself?

[BoSoxGal]

@Taffdar

[Daisy]

Can't see where there might be one set. However I'm only viewing from my phone.

LoCA please report the post you wish to amend, when I get back to my Mac tonight Ill try and have a look.

[Sean]

There seems to be a limit of around 48 hours Dais...

[loCAtek]

Also Daisy, why did you delete my signature line?

It was innocent enough, why was it edited by the Admin?

[The Hen]

Deary me Lo. What did your signature say?

[Daisy]

I'm not sure that I did delete any sigs.

If I did I apologise the last time I looked at your user details was to check your posting rights for the mediation thread.

I didn't make any changes to your profile as there wasn't any required.

[The Hen]

She had her old sig after that.

What was your new one Lo?

Maybe you did it wrong yourself?

[loCAtek]

Well, since I've logged on today, I hadn't posted since Thursday. I understand there are others with access to Admin features. I suppose someone could have been offended by my sig reading, "Based on a true story", that they would delete it.

Very well, I'll put it back, and maybe my posts won't be censored again.

[Daisy]

Also your posts have not been censored by myself.

I will check the logs. But we as a group of admins have said other than in the case of personal identifiable information we will NEVER EVER amend a post.

[loCAtek]

Um, yea. ...and I was assured that my personal correspondence would remain private.

By that, I don't mean you Daisy, I understand you mean well, and you've always been a mate. Gracias.

[Scooter]

And yet one more completely unsubstantiated accusation, crafted to support yet another unsubstantiated accusation, that she has been subjected to rules that no one else has. Do you never tire of trying to make other people responsible for the consequences of your behaviour? I guess not, because the more you do it, the more you end up enjoying rolling around in the much you created.

[The Hen]

Um, yea. ...and I was assured that my personal correspondence would remain private.

By that, I don't mean you Daisy, I understand you mean well, and you've always been a mate. Gracias.

What private correspondence are you accusing me of making public?

if you are referring to me, this is yet another. Of your unsubstantiated LIES.

You are a vile person.

If not me, carry on substatiating your claim. You are still a vile person.


Oh and if it is me, take it to the fucking mediation thread you weak woman.

[loCAtek]

Umm Jim, I have to put my hand up as already posting verbatim something Lo posted to me at the beginning of her involving me in her life

[The Hen]

Yes, it was the beginning part of a sentence that disproved another of your lies about me.

That sentence that revealed NOTHING about what you posted and I apologized to you for doing it.

Your point?

[loCAtek]

Umm Jim, I have to put my hand up as already posting verbatim something Lo posted to me at the beginning of her involving me in her life:

Long story short, I'd like some input on relationships since .... [snip]

Care to move the goal posts further?

[The Hen]

If you link to that thread you will see that you were lying when you said you never asked me for input into your life.

I posted the opening words from your first email. I only posted those words which revealed nothing of your story.

I apologised after posting it. But it did prove that you repeatedly lied to the Board.

You always lie Lo. You are a vile liar.

[loCAtek]

The point was: That sentence that revealed SOMETHING


My words were: Don't try to fix me. ...but you're welcome to keep goal post changing.

[The Hen]

Is this your issue?

Something I proved you to lie about when you said that you had never asked me to fix you? Your own words proved you to be a liar without breaching any other confidentialities and you are STILL sore about it?

You should take this to the Mediation thread.

Folks, I think Lo has finally fessed to what is causing her to be bilious.

I have done a little researching of this matter.

The issue was covered in the thread Here you go Lo....

it appears that this nearly year old thread, together with the unreserved apology I gave, are what's behind the crap Lo has been spreading all over the Board.

Essentially Lo had lied. I was able to prove she lied with nine words of hers that revealed no personal information, I then apologized for doing this.

I kept out of her way unless she specifically addressed me (other than her squirrel torture thread) and still she is smarting over something I apologized for nearly a year ago.

You are a weak woman Lo.

Then for ignoring my apology, and now for still smarting that I outted you as a liar.