Page 1 of 5
When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:01 am
by loCAtek
...and why was no one notified?
For no reason other than grammar, I tried to edit an old 'Alpha Dog' post and found it was frozen. More recent posts seem to be edit-able; so, why the change?
What's the time limit, and why weren't we told about it?

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:01 am
by Sean
It's a conspiracy I tells ya!
Well Taffdar? What have you got to say for yourself?
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:11 am
by BoSoxGal
@Taffdar

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:22 pm
by Daisy
Can't see where there might be one set. However I'm only viewing from my phone.
LoCA please report the post you wish to amend, when I get back to my Mac tonight Ill try and have a look.
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:53 am
by Sean
There seems to be a limit of around 48 hours Dais...
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:26 pm
by loCAtek
Also Daisy, why did you delete my signature line?
It was innocent enough, why was it edited by the Admin?
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:15 pm
by The Hen
Deary me Lo. What did your signature say?
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:21 pm
by Daisy
I'm not sure that I did delete any sigs.
If I did I apologise the last time I looked at your user details was to check your posting rights for the mediation thread.
I didn't make any changes to your profile as there wasn't any required.
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:24 pm
by The Hen
She had her old sig after that.
What was your new one Lo?
Maybe you did it wrong yourself?
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:30 pm
by loCAtek
Well, since I've logged on today, I hadn't posted since Thursday. I understand there are others with access to Admin features. I suppose someone could have been offended by my sig reading, "Based on a true story", that they would delete it.
Very well, I'll put it back, and maybe my posts won't be censored again.
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:35 pm
by Daisy
Also your posts have not been censored by myself.
I will check the logs. But we as a group of admins have said other than in the case of personal identifiable information we will NEVER EVER amend a post.
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:40 pm
by loCAtek
Um, yea. ...and I was assured that my personal correspondence would remain private.
By that, I don't mean you Daisy, I understand you mean well, and you've always been a mate. Gracias.
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:42 pm
by Scooter
And yet one more completely unsubstantiated accusation, crafted to support yet another unsubstantiated accusation, that she has been subjected to rules that no one else has. Do you never tire of trying to make other people responsible for the consequences of your behaviour? I guess not, because the more you do it, the more you end up enjoying rolling around in the much you created.
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:13 pm
by The Hen
loCAtek wrote:Um, yea. ...and I was assured that my personal correspondence would remain private.
By that, I don't mean you Daisy, I understand you mean well, and you've always been a mate. Gracias.
What private correspondence are you accusing me of making public?
if you are referring to me, this is yet another. Of your unsubstantiated LIES.
You are a vile person.
If not me, carry on substatiating your claim. You are still a vile person.
Oh and if it is me, take it to the fucking mediation thread you weak woman.
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:29 pm
by loCAtek
The Hen wrote:Umm Jim, I have to put my hand up as already posting verbatim something Lo posted to me at the beginning of her involving me in her life
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:30 pm
by The Hen
Yes, it was the beginning part of a sentence that disproved another of your lies about me.
That sentence that revealed NOTHING about what you posted and I apologized to you for doing it.
Your point?
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:32 pm
by loCAtek
Umm Jim, I have to put my hand up as already posting verbatim something Lo posted to me at the beginning of her involving me in her life:
Long story short, I'd like some input on relationships since .... [snip]
Care to move the goal posts further?
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:35 pm
by The Hen
If you link to that thread you will see that you were lying when you said you never asked me for input into your life.
I posted the opening words from your first email. I only posted those words which revealed nothing of your story.
I apologised after posting it. But it did prove that you repeatedly lied to the Board.
You always lie Lo. You are a vile liar.
Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:36 pm
by loCAtek
The point was: That sentence that revealed SOMETHING
My words were: Don't try to fix me. ...but you're welcome to keep goal post changing.

Re: When was there a time limit put on the 'edit' feature?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:43 pm
by The Hen
Is this your issue?
Something I proved you to lie about when you said that you had never asked me to fix you? Your own words proved you to be a liar without breaching any other confidentialities and you are STILL sore about it?
You should take this to the Mediation thread.
Folks, I think Lo has finally fessed to what is causing her to be bilious.
I have done a little researching of this matter.
The issue was covered in the thread
Here you go Lo....
it appears that this nearly year old thread, together with the unreserved apology I gave, are what's behind the crap Lo has been spreading all over the Board.
Essentially Lo had lied. I was able to prove she lied with nine words of hers that revealed no personal information, I then apologized for doing this.
I kept out of her way unless she specifically addressed me (other than her squirrel torture thread) and still she is smarting over something I apologized for nearly a year ago.
You are a weak woman Lo.
Then for ignoring my apology, and now for still smarting that I outted you as a liar.