She's inching her way towards the edge of the cliff, again

[Scooter]

Don't say that some of us haven't recognized and predicted this pattern before.

[Sean]

We're approaching that point in the cycle again...

[Andrew D]

What is really driving your animosity?

That's probably a question better answered for yourself than for others.

[The Hen]

She's leapt off it actually.

[The Hen]

What is really driving your animosity?
.

Being lied about.

Having a false history assigned to me.

Being told I am lying.

Being stalked on other Boards.

Being told I have dope psychosis.

Having a false and egregious complaint lodged regarding Gob's employment.


I reckon that is what is driving my animosity.

What do you think Andrew?

[Lord Jim]

Well, she stopped inching and took a swan dive....

[MajGenl.Meade]

[Andrew D]

What do you think Andrew?

Actually, Hen, my question was directed to Scooter. I understand that you have grievances against loCAtek. And if nothing else, her latest conduct strikes me -- based on the limited facts available to me -- as inexcusable. But I do not understand why Scooter is so obsessed with her as to start a thread against her with an entirely uninformative opening posting.

[The Hen]

I guess he started to see signs in her posts that she was picking at scabs once more. (Potentially on dope issues relating to me which possibly may have lead to a complaint being lodged about me with my employer.)

I saw the same signs, but I knew what was coming. Scooter did not. He was premature on starting the thread, but right with spotting the signs.

[oldr_n_wsr]

(Potentially on dope issues relating to me which possibly may have lead to a complaint being lodged about me with my employer.)

May you pee clean.

[The Hen]

I haven't touched it for over eight years.

[oldr_n_wsr]

Sometimes one cannot help geting pee on their hands, that's why we wash after going.

[MajGenl.Meade]

I haven't touched it for over eight years.

Isn't that rather unhygenic?

[TPFKA@W]

Has this been happening in cycles of 28 days?

[The Hen]

It is a tad more irregular.

[oldr_n_wsr]

Not for nothing, but there appears to be one or two new posters who are involved in this discussion and seem to know a little more about it than the average "new member" would. Don't know what it is about and I am not a conspiracy person, but it just seems odd.

[MajGenl.Meade]

I haven't seen a "new" poster yet oldr. Just some old 'faces' (so to speak)

[Daisy]

TPFKA@W is @meric@nwom@n, her old account got accidentally swept out when removing some spammers. (I'm side-eyeing you there Gob :p) I was unable to resurrect it.

I am happy for the board to welcome back old posters, wether they have axes to grind or not.

It all adds to a lively debating atmosphere in our "pub" (love that analogy, I think it was Meade who come up with it, it fits perfectly with how this place runs).

[MajGenl.Meade]

Can't claim credit for that one, Dais.

[oldr_n_wsr]

TPFKA@W is @meric@nwom@n,

My bad, guess I am looking at conspiracies and $h!t in light of recent events. Sorry I didn't make the connection.
Never Mind.