Rube, if there's one thing you have consistently demonstrated here, it is an atrocious knowledge of history....factually, demonstrably atrocious, as has been proven numerous times...The two above are examples of the shit-bombs I routinely ignore. And do here as well.
So when I read you describing yourself as "someone who has always read a lot of history"...
Hilarity immediately ensued...
(The immediate question that springs to mind upon seeing such a bizarre claim, is "If he isn't lying, what on earth has he been reading that would lead him to make some of the appallingly inaccurate historical claims he has made? Whatever it is, it should be avoided like the plague by anyone who would like to have even a minimally accurate understanding of the past.")
And since the obvious humor of you making such a claim was apparently not caused by a deliberate effort on your part to be funny, then the logical conclusion is that it sprang from your world class cluelessness about yourself, making it "unintentional humor"...
A skill, which as I have pointed out before, you excel at with a singular talent, and which is the number one thing that makes your posts worth reading.