No accounting for taste

Food, recipes, fashion, sport, education, exercise, sexuality, travel.
wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by wesw »

you have a real talent for getting under one s skin joe :)

...of course, so do chiggers...

what irritates me is the trend, in newspapers, of putting prepositional phrases between hyphens. what s wrong with commas?

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Lord Jim »

every other word is "like"
I have to confess that I was part of the first "like" generation...

Back in the mid 70s my mother used to call me on that...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15505
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Joe Guy »

wesw wrote:you have a real talent for getting under one s skin joe :)
Is that...like.. a put down? I'm like totally...what's up with that?

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Guinevere »

Long Run wrote:
MajGenl.Meade wrote:
But this f-ing nom, nom is driving me nuts (as the pirate with the wheel in his crotch said).
I think it's totes awesome.
Totes adorbs, dude
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Lord Jim »

I have to admit I fell into the "dude" thing when I moved out to the Left Coast... :oops:
Last edited by Lord Jim on Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by wesw »

no joe. just a joke. sorry if I offended you.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Gob »



"Ms Moon-Zapper". ROTFLMFFAO, the way she pronounced that had me in stitches.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15505
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Joe Guy »

wesw wrote:no joe. just a joke. sorry if I offended you.
I wasn't offended, wesw. I was like.... just messin' wit yo head.

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by wesw »

what up yo? you crazy chigger? you don t mess wit wes. wes is da best and only da best mess with wes. you ain t the best so don t mess, wit wes

I remember moon unit. gag me with a spoon. I saw d'weasel on wife swap show, he seemed nice.
his dad taught me not to eat yellow snow, over there where the huskies go

see the two paragraphs are totally incongruous meade. they don t belong in the same post. i m the same way with my tools, they belong where they belong, and if they aren t there it bothers me. I really don t double post to annoy you until you get nasty. I should not even do it to annoy then, and I ll try, to not try, to annoy you, but I post the way I post. I ll probably still add thoughts, by re-posting too. I don t like to edit except for spelling or grammar and to correct facts, in which case I ll label the edit.

now I have a third paragraph that belongs in another post.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21516
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

I don t like to edit except for spelling or grammar

Oh my! They just don't write 'em like that any more.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9143
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Sue U »

I know, right?
GAH!

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by TPFKA@W »

I think you should see a proctologist about that stick up your arse. :mrgreen:

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21516
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

You gonna let that go by, Sue?

:shrug
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

What's the world coming too?

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9143
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Sue U »

Whatevs, I could care less.
GAH!

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by TPFKA@W »

I think Sue gets who the stick remark was meant for. I think Meade does as well.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21516
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Tee hee... of course!
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply