This is just a ball of confused communication and motives. All I've been trying to do is agree with you where facts are known.
a. I posted that the manager Zayat admitted the incorrect spelling was on the stable's submission. However, I didn't realize that chap, Zayat, was the horse's owner. I thought he worked at a stable. So, my bad.
b. I too posted that the woman told media outlets she checked the spelling before she submitted the name. Maybe she did and maybe she didn't. I don't know
You complained about wrong spelling and how people can't use dictionaries any more (twice) - I agreed
You've blamed an unknown clerical person for this - could be the case
You've claimed I'm posting fiction - I posted actual quotes showing a and b above
You appear to be 100% certain that the lady who submitted the name isn't telling fibs to cover her faux pas - that may be true but I cannot be certain. (ETA the word "be")
I would be happy for you to use Biblical references to demonstrate my hypocrisy in all of the above. I just don't have much respect for ad hominem Bible waving without substance.
Really BSG, you started it all off with complaints about a word being misspelled (through ignorance) and people not being to use dictionaries. OK. Now you argue that it isn't a misspelling from ignorance but a "clerical error", which no amount of dictionaries can solve.
And somehow I'm the hypocrite picking a fight? C'mon admit it - you backed
Tale of Verve, right?

For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts