Page 1 of 1

Sir!! Miss!! Sir!!!

Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 9:47 pm
by Gob
Calling teachers "Sir" or "Miss" is depressing, sexist and gives women in schools a lower status than their male counterparts, an academic has said.

Prof Jennifer Coates told the Times Educational Supplement "Sir is a knight... but Miss is ridiculous - it doesn't match Sir at all".

She said she had been struck by the disparity while volunteering in a secondary school.

But one educationalist said being called "Miss" was a sign of respect.

Prof Coates, emeritus professor of English language and linguistics at the University of Roehampton, said she had been surprised by the different titles given to male and female teachers.

"I didn't think there was this awful disparity between professorial status and these young teachers, but they're all Sir and I'm not.

"It's a depressing example of how women are given low status and men, no matter how young or new in the job they are, are given high status."

Re: Sir!! Miss!! Sir!!!

Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 11:11 pm
by Lord Jim
When I was a kid, the female equivalent of "sir" was "ma'am"...

But nowadays, if you call any woman south of 70 "ma'am" you're likely to get one in the chops...(or a least an icy glare)

I suspect "Miss" came into use as an attempt to deal with people being offended by "ma'am"...(which now apparently has become "offensive"...some folks are so busy finding new things to be offended about, it's difficult to keep up...)

However in the case of Prof. Coates, I'd be happy to dispense with the use of either "Miss" or "Ma'am" as a form of address, and instead go with the unarguably gender-neutral, "Hey, hyper-sensitive dumb-fuck"...

Re: Sir!! Miss!! Sir!!!

Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 11:16 pm
by Gob
LIKE!!!

Re: Sir!! Miss!! Sir!!!

Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 9:14 pm
by TPFKA@W
On STTNG weren't all the officers were called Sir irrespective of gender?