Loadsamoney

Food, recipes, fashion, sport, education, exercise, sexuality, travel.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Loadsamoney

Post by Gob »

Typical pensioner incomes now outstrip those of working-age people, a report from the Resolution Foundation says.

Pensioners are also now more likely than their predecessors to still be in work, own a home and have access to generous private pensions, it adds.

The think tank says growth in pensioner incomes has been coupled with weak income growth for working-age people.

Pensioner households are now £20 a week better off than working age households, but were £70 a week worse off in 2001.

However, the report, called As Time Goes By, adds: "This strong growth is not the result of a boom time for all pensioners, with most finding that their personal situation changes little from year-to-year. "

It says while typical incomes across the pensioner population have grown by more than 30% since 2001, the typical income of someone who turned 65 in that year was only 7% higher by 2014.

Continues here...
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Loadsamoney

Post by dales »

I don't know how this compares with the UK, here is the cost of living indexes since 2001 for US Social Security.

YEAR - COLA (cost of living index)
2001 2.6
2002 1.4
2003 2.1
2004 2.7
2005 4.1
2006 3.3
2007 2.3
2008 5.8
2009 0.0
2010 0.0
2011 3.6
2012 1.7
2013 1.5
2014 1.7
2015 0.0
2016 0.3
A quick rudimentary adding check of the COLA's since 2001 shows a quotient of a little over 25%.

perhaps rube can help me, he's good at this kind of stuff.....NAH!

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Loadsamoney

Post by rubato »

I don't know where that 25% is coming from. I get that $ 1.00 in 2001 is $1.38 in 2016 or a 38% net increase if each of those increases is compounded.

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Loadsamoney

Post by dales »

I added all the yearly COLA's from 2001 to 2016.

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

Post Reply