I NEVER wear boxers, my cock always hangs out of them.BoSoxGal wrote:Gob sees ‘change’ and ‘female’ in the same sentence and his boxers twist reflexively. He’s a very conservative guy.
Sciency stuff not for girlies
Re: Sciency stuff not for girlies
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Sciency stuff not for girlies
Yeah, right.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
Re: Sciency stuff not for girlies
Gob--you're saying that like it's a bad thing.
Re: Sciency stuff not for girlies
I've found that it helps to wear an inside thigh holster with boxers... 
Sciency stuff not for girlies
I find that a 10" strip of Velcro works as good as a holster.
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.”
Re: Sciency stuff not for girlies
I just tuck it in my sock.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
-
ex-khobar Andy
- Posts: 5442
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
- Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018
Re: Sciency stuff not for girlies
It's interesting that the first woman in 55 years to be awarded a Nobel Prize in physics was deemed not worthy of an entry in Wikipedia until the award was made; and of course this is taken as evidence that Wikipedia editors are all unfeeling males
What has not, AFAIK, been remarked on yet is that one of the chemistry Nobelists awarded yesterday - George P. Smith - did not have a Wikipedia entry until after his prize was announced. You can see this for yourself by going to his page and looking at Revision History and there is nothing there until 3 October.
In other words it's not, at least in this instance, a male plot - but simple incompetence. Which is, unfortunately, so often the case.
What has not, AFAIK, been remarked on yet is that one of the chemistry Nobelists awarded yesterday - George P. Smith - did not have a Wikipedia entry until after his prize was announced. You can see this for yourself by going to his page and looking at Revision History and there is nothing there until 3 October.
In other words it's not, at least in this instance, a male plot - but simple incompetence. Which is, unfortunately, so often the case.
Re: Sciency stuff not for girlies
Lots of academics and scientists and other working professionals who aren’t celebrities don’t have Wiki pages. I don’t know if that’s a commentary on anything other than their good luck.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
Re: Sciency stuff not for girlies
I agree, and since Wiki is dedicated to disseminating information of general interest I am not surprised. There are probably any number of scientists, male and female, well known and well respected in their fields who are virtually unknown to the rest of the public.