Plan B Forum

A six-year-old US girl has become the unlikely poster child for the rights of transgender people after her school barred her from using the girls' bathroom.




The family of Coy Mathis has filed a civil rights lawsuit against her Colorado school over the issue, which has become a cause celebre since hitting the headlines this week, CNN reported on Thursday.

Coy was born a boy but according to her mother she started expressing herself as a girl at the age of 18 months.

When the behaviour continued, the parents sought medical advice and were told that their child was transgender - a little girl in a boy's body.

Though they diagnosed Coy as having a gender identity disorder, doctors recommended against surgery until she is older.


When the child was in kindergarten at Eagle Elementary School in Fountain, Colorado there was no problem because Coy was allowed to use the girls' bathroom.

But in December school officials told the family that Coy could no longer use the girls' facilities and would have to use the boys' or nurse's bathroom instead.

"That wasn't a safe environment for her," said Coy's mother Kathryn Mathis, a nurse.

"It set her up for a lot of harassment and it wasn't a place where we were able to let her be because we want her to be safe and we want her to be healthy."

Their case was taken up by the Transgender Legal Defence and Education Fund, which hopes that Coy's story will have far-reaching ramifications.

"For many transgender people, discrimination is a daily part of life. Unfortunately for Coy, it has started very early," lawyer Michael Silverman said.

"The world is going to be looking at the school [to] send a message to the world and teach tolerance, fair play and equal rights."

The school said its decision "took into account not only Coy, but other students in the building, their parents and the future impact a boy with male genitals using a girls' bathroom would have as Coy grew older".

Kathryn Mathis is not blind to the possibilities but fears the district will stigmatise her daughter at a crucial stage in her development.



"They're punishing a six-year-old for something that hasn't happened and may not happen," she told CNN on Thursday.

"Her body development is none of their business. That is up to her and her doctors in the future.

"Right now we need to be protecting a six-year-old, not a middle-schooler or a high-schooler."

"We are hoping that they will change their minds and they will teach that you can love somebody and accept somebody even if they are different."

The case has sparked strong reaction on social networks and news sites.

On CNN alone over 16,000 people had commented on the report by Thursday.

News of the case came amid signs of mounting acceptance in the US of alternative lifestyles.

The US Supreme Court is set to consider an appeal against a ban on gay marriage based on the fact that it violates the equal rights of gay couples.

So-called Proposition 8 was passed in a statewide California ballot in 2008 and a new Field Poll has suggested that 61 per cent of Californians now approve of same sex marriage, compared to 32 per cent opposed.

More than 100 prominent Republicans have filed a so-called friend-of-the-court brief urging it to strike down the gay marriage ban, the New York Times reported.

The school said its decision "took into account not only Coy, but other students in the building, their parents and the future impact a boy with male genitals using a girls' bathroom would have as Coy grew older".

Crackpot wrote:This sort of thing worries me. 18 months? Really? I think there is such a thing as being too encouraging/supportive

keld feldspar wrote:Get a note from that doctor and send him/her to the nurses restroom...

Scooter wrote:

keld feldspar wrote:Get a note from that doctor and send him/her to the nurses restroom...

Tell the other nosy parker parents that if they can't handle having their children share a bathroom with this girl, they should send their kids to school with appropriately sized corks to help them hold it in until they get home.

Scooter wrote:It doesn't say that the parents were advised at 18 months that the kid was transgender. It says the child began expressing herself as a girl at 18 months, and that at some later, unspecified time, but before the kid had finshed kindergarten (because she was using the girls' washroom then) they got medical advice and were told the child was transgender.

according to her mother she started expressing herself as a girl at the age of 18 months.

Joe Guy wrote:What kind of information is used to determine that an 18 month old child is transgender?

Oh come now, Jim.

The child ADORED shopping.

Scooter wrote:

Joe Guy wrote:What kind of information is used to determine that an 18 month old child is transgender?

None, because no such determination was made when the child was 18 months old. Try actually reading the article this time.

Scooter wrote:"When the behaviour continued" clearly indicates that some period of time passed between the parents first observing the behaviour and when they brought the child to a doctor, at which point the diagnosis was made. There is absolutely nothing to suggest that the diagnosis was made within the same month, as you keep insisting, and there is nothing "nit-picking" about pointing that out, since you (and others) insist on hinging your opinion of the doctor's diagnosis on that specific age.

Scooter wrote:The child could have been 20 or 24 months old when she was diagnosed, or she could have been four or five years old. Nothing in the article allows us to narrow it down any more than that.

Scooter wrote:But like loCAtek, you have to cover for the fact that you made a mistake and misread the article, so you will continue to turn handstands to do so. Be my guest.

Tell the other nosy parker parents that if they can't handle having their children share a bathroom with this girl, they should send their kids to school with appropriately sized corks to help them hold it in until they get home.