Page 1 of 2

uh oh!

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:15 pm
by rubato
Guess what we just bought! A blue BMW! To replace my wife's commuter car (also a blue BMW) which had 178,000 mi on it:

http://autos.yahoo.com/news/bmw-drivers ... 56020.html
BMW drivers really are jerks, studies find
I'm sending this to her work email.


yrs,
rubato

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:38 pm
by Crackpot
Why do I not see this as the least bit surprising?

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:45 pm
by Sue U
I sing a modified version of the old Supertramp song:

Beemer, I know you drive a Beemer
And you've got your head up your ass, oh no!

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:30 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
"we"? "we"?

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:38 pm
by Gob
Hedgehog.

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 9:03 pm
by Jarlaxle
Geez, only 179k? why did you need to replace it?

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:58 pm
by rubato
Her response:

"You can't believe everything you see on the internet."

yrs,
rubato

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:52 am
by oldr_n_wsr
Came across this article the other day.
http://autos.yahoo.com/news/bmw-drivers ... 56020.html
Drivers of BMWs frequently come in for anecdotal criticism for habits on the road that are perceived as aggressive.

Now, a couple of studies, one in the U.S. and another from the U.K., appear to provide statistical evidence that BMW drivers are, to be polite about it, complete jerks.

In the older study, by researchers at the University of California, BMW drivers were far less likely to stop for a pedestrian who had just entered a crosswalk, the New York Times notes.

“In our crosswalk study, none of the cars in the beater-car category drove through the crosswalk. They always stopped for pedestrians," researcher Paul K. Piff told the paper. He added that not only were "fancy cars were less likely to stop," but also that "BMW drivers were the worst."

Drivers of BMWs and other high-status cars (including Prius hybrids) were also more likely to cheat at four-way-stop intersections, according to the research.

In the second study, in the U.K., motorists were asked to identify the make and color of the car from which they have most frequently suffered road-rage incidents, the Daily Mail reports.

The study of 2,837 motorists found men between the ages of 35 and 50 driving blue BMWs were most likely to be reported as having engaged in road-rage behaviors such as aggressive driving and swearing.
:mrgreen:

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:54 pm
by rubato
A Prius is a 'high status car'?


And all children are above average.

yrs,
rubato

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:18 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
Yes because it is purchased by poseurs who seek the cachet. it's a crap car of tremendous environmental downsides. But tree huggers love to look trendy

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:36 pm
by rubato
They have the same excellent build quality of other Toyotas and are quite comfortable (having been a passenger a few times)

"tremendous environmental downsides"

Which are?


yrs,
rubato

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:18 pm
by Crackpot
Battery construction and disposal

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:50 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
Prolonging the lives of Californians? No really not that.... because it still uses petrol (duh!) and as someone once said: (guess who?)
You have BMW saying that current supercars are too militaristic and that people want a softer, more caring car these days. What people? Not me, that's for sure. And not you either. And not the hoards of ______ ______ fans I met in Romania this month who, so far as I can tell, would sleep with a fat middle-aged man just for the chance to sit in an Aston Martin. One man, in a thin white nylon trouser suit, got within six feet of the DBS and, I'm not kidding, started to become erect. In the presence of a Prius, he'd have been Mr Floppy.

Then you have Rolls and Porsche, and Volvo and Saab and Toyota and Mahindra, and Kia and Hyundai and Peugeot and Fiat and Ford and GM and Honda all spending fortunes on the next generation of petrol hybrids and diesel hybrids and plug-in hybrids, all of which meet a fleeting need now, in the same way that cats met a fleeting need 30 years ago. But they aren't the answer.

Yes, hydrogen is difficult and expensive to produce. But it was difficult and expensive for Ellen MacArthur to sail round the world. It was difficult and expensive to go to the Moon. It'd also have been difficult and expensive to make lean-burn engines work. But if someone had done that, the oil we have left would last longer. And the eco-mentalists would be focusing on cows not cars.

The trouble is, of course, human beings never learn from their mistakes of the past. We're like insects, endlessly banging our heads on the window in the hope that this time, the glass will have gone. Remember that if you feel tempted to buy a Prius. What you're being, is a moth.

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:31 pm
by Crackpot
Hydrogen takes more energy to produce so you're effectively using a lot of dirty energy to produce less clean energy

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:26 pm
by dales
What rubato knows about cars could be written on the head of a pin. :lol:

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:59 pm
by Gob
With a two inch paint brush.

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:11 pm
by Joe Guy
...that had never been cleaned after many times being used to paint a beehive.

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:29 am
by Jarlaxle
If Rube weren't a hypocrite, he would buy a Volt, a Leaf, or a Tesla.

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:32 pm
by Gob
Jarlaxle wrote:If Rube weren't a hypocrite, he would get his wife to buy him a Volt, a Leaf, or a Tesla.
Fixed that for you.

Re: uh oh!

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:17 pm
by rubato
Crackpot wrote:Hydrogen takes more energy to produce so you're effectively using a lot of dirty energy to produce less clean energy
Hydrogen? no one is buying cars which use hydrogen fuel cells. They cost too much.


yrs,
rubato