On being a "gentleman".

All things philosophical, related to belief and / or religions of any and all sorts.
Personal philosophy welcomed.
dgs49
Posts: 3458
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:13 pm

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by dgs49 »

Surprised no one here from the British Commonwealth countries mentioned "breeding," and that sort of thing. I guess those many be anachronistic at this point even there.

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Sean »

Why would you expect somebody specifically from the Commonwealth to mention breeding Dave?
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Gob »

Envy? :D
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21233
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Never mind the Commonwealth, dgs (and really! "Breeding" in such places <snort>!)

In the old country boys of a certain class or aspiration to same were brought up to be polite and remove their hats upon entering a building; to hold open doors for and give up seats on the 'bus to ladies, older persons and the infirm; to say "please" and "thank you", even to servants such as waiters and shop-girls. In fact, even girls were brought up to do the same.

The country is now occupied by nasty layabouts who like to use f***k as a form of mental placeholding while they try to think of something coherent to utter. A pity. Nothing has changed for the better since 1966 - rather the reverse

Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply