Philosophy

All things philosophical, related to belief and / or religions of any and all sorts.
Personal philosophy welcomed.
Post Reply
User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Philosophy

Post by Sean »

Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable.
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
Who could think you under the table.

David Hume could out-consume
Schopenhauer and Hegel
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel.

There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya
'Bout the raising of the wrist.
Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed.

John Stuart Mill, of his own free will,
On half a pint of shandy was particularly ill.
Plato, they say, could stick it away--
Half a crate of whisky every day.

Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle.
Hobbes was fond of his dram,
And René Descartes was a drunken fart.
'I drink, therefore I am.'

Yes, Socrates, himself, is particularly missed,
A lovely little thinker,
But a bugger when he's pissed.
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19481
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Philosophy

Post by BoSoxGal »

Glad we've gotten off to such a weighty intellectual start in this forum. :lol:
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Philosophy

Post by Sean »

It had to be done... :D
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Philosophy

Post by Gob »

And who better to start it? :beat
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
The Hen
Posts: 5941
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Philosophy

Post by The Hen »

The Hatch has started doing Philosophy at School this year.

And as Gob and I always reply ... "Or has she".
Bah!

Image

User avatar
Miles
Posts: 960
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:51 pm
Location: Butler Pa, USA

Re: Philosophy

Post by Miles »

The Hen wrote:The Hatch has started doing Philosophy at School this year.

And as Gob and I always reply ... "Or has she".
Tell her for me that Hegel has a definate moral preference over Kant. ;)
I expect to go straight to hell...........at least I won't have to spend time making new friends.

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Philosophy

Post by Andrew D »

The study of philosophy is a great thing. Everyone who can handle it should be encouraged to do it.

It brings no material rewards. Unless one is fortunate enough to land a professorship in philosophy or to author some bestseller on the subject or to find some other (rare) way of making money from it, one will get nothing in the material world out of it.

It generally brings no comfort. On the contrary, it tends to induce a sense of having no belonging.
Others have more than they need, but I alone have nothing.
I am a fool. Oh, yes! I am confused.
Other men are clear and bright,
But I alone am dim and weak.
Other men are sharp and clever,
But I alone am dull and stupid.
Oh, I drift like the waves of the sea,
Without direction, like the restless wind.

Everyone else is busy,
But I alone am aimless and depressed.
I am different.
I am nourished by the great mother.
(Tao Te Ching (trans. Gia-Fu Feng and Jane English, 1972), ch. 20.)

Still, it is among the most rewarding pursuits out there. "The unclouded eye is better, no matter what it sees." (Approximately from Frank Herbert.)

The study of philosophy forces one to confront the difficult issues. And what could be more rewarding than that?
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

Post Reply