loCAtek wrote:Well, it's not like all could afford it...
Very true, though I suspect were it to become widely available, enough would be able to afford it to cause problems, and like anything, as such a drug gains acceptance, its price drops. Hell - that is the sort of thing people would go into debt for.
loCAtek wrote:Besides, it's not the death rate that is the problem, but the birth rate
Not true. Both are the problem.
So, it's not a good thing. Those who chose not to participate in it are more ethical. 'eh?
loCAtek wrote:So, it's not a good thing. Those who chose not to participate in it are more ethical. 'eh?
I don't think they are more ethical - more altruistic maybe. Though let's face it, if people decided not to take such a drug to lengthen their lives (assuming it existed, of course) to be more ethical/altruistic, then surely they should start by consuming less energy, wasting less and giving more to charity? Just mho
If a man speaks in the forest and there are no women around to hear is he still wrong?