So lo having embarrassed her self into a corner refuses to explain what she has said, and reverts to the old trick of "you need to explain what you said so I can reinterpret what I said."
OK, LO
Anyone with half a brain can understand what I said;
I;m so glad I don't suffer from religion.
I'm glad I do not suffer religion.
m so glad that any kid the Hatch has won't need an aging child molester in a frock to pour water onto it to "legitimise" it.
I'm so glad that we have brought up Hatch in a non-religious household, so she will not feel the need nor pressure nor force to have a "priest" pour water onto the child's head in a religious rite in order for that child to be "legitimized"(Dave Mort's phrase that children are legitimised by this rite,) as it is a gross stupidity and insult to think any child that hasn't had an
aging child molester, I'm sorry, "priest" pour water on its head is not legitimate.
loCAtek wrote:
You don't want your grandkids to have a godparent; despite the fact that you are one.
That's right. I was asked to be a god parent by people who were having their kids baptised to please their parents, who were provbably only wanting it done as it was "the done thing." None of the kids I am godparent to have attended church since, outside of weddings, I'm glad the tradition is dying out, I will not support it further.
You claim you don't believe all clergy are pedophiles, but you fear your future grandchildren will be baptized by aging child molesters.
Why is that, Gob?
I don;'t fear it you stupid little twat. I was taking the piss out of the "religious" organisation;
Sexual abuse of minors in the priesthood has received significant media attention in Canada, Ireland, the United States, the United Kingdom, Mexico, Belgium, France, and Germany, while cases have been reported throughout the world.
In addition to cases of actual abuse, much of the scandal has focused around members of the Catholic hierarchy who did not report abuse allegations to the civil authorities and who, in many cases, reassigned the offenders to other locations where the alleged predators continued to have contact with minors and had opportunities to continue to sexually abuse children. In defending their actions, some bishops and psychiatrists contended that the prevailing psychology of the times suggested that people could be cured of such behavior through counseling.
Ok, so there it is explained, all your questions answered.
Now then justify these...
loCAtek wrote:Gob wrote:I;m so glad I don't suffer from religion.
'm so glad that any kid the Hatch has won't need an aging child molester in a frock to pour water onto it to "legitimise" it.
Good thing, that's a fairy tale only bigots against religion believe in.
Never mind, you're not her da, anywayZ.
loCAtek wrote:Wow, I'm being ignored? You couldn't tell that by the comments, but I'm glad it feeds that need for power, for'ya. For those you listening, or pretending not to...
'Kay, I missed that Gob was talking about his grandkids...
However, the myth is not that there are pedophiles in the clergy but that you'll find them only in the clergy.
That's a twist of religious bigotry. If someone felt so strongly that they should keep their kids (or grandkids) away from occupations that held pedophiles, then they wouldn't send their child to doctors, teachers, nannies, entertainers, boy/girl scouts etc. and just lock them in the family basement...
No wait, child abuse is also committed by the very parents of the children! Drop your kids down a well to protect them, and brick up the mouth.
loCAtek wrote:Gob wrote:
An yet no one, NO ONE, has stated that pedophiles exist only in the church..
...
No, no one has. Yet, you use that as an excuse to bash religion.
If you cannot explain, then onto ignore you go....
