Banking on bigotry

[Joe Guy]

I'm not surprised. He seems to know a lot about negroes also.

[MajGenl.Meade]

Yes, he's well up on them both

[Scooter]

I'm not surprised. He seems to know a lot about negroes knee-grows also.

FTFY

[Lord Jim]

I'm not surprised. He seems to know a lot about negroes knee-grows also.

FTFY

Yes, that was kind of the defining moment for Dave on the racism question...

[dgs49]

Fuck you all very much.

Since I do NOT personally know much about lesbian relationships (and no one who is not actually IN one does) I sourced people who do research on the subject of lesbian sexuality, rather than the more scientific, "I know a lesbian couple..."

Funny, I haven't noticed anyone refuting the article I linked, which basically supported my position.

[rubato]

Fuck you all very much.

Since I do NOT personally know much about lesbian relationships (and no one who is not actually IN one does) I sourced people who do research on the subject of lesbian sexuality, rather than the more scientific, "I know a lesbian couple..."

Funny, I haven't noticed anyone refuting the article I linked, which basically supported my position.

Your position is that you don't know the difference between a happy sex life and frequency of intercourse.


It's like saying that eating 20 Big Macs is better than one dinner at Sierra Mar.


yrs,
rubato

[Scooter]

Funny, I haven't noticed anyone refuting the article I linked, which basically supported my position.

That's because everyone is laughing at your inability to recognize that your own source demolishes the bullshit claims you made.

You cited this:

female same-sex couples have a lower sexual frequency than both mixed-sex (male-female) couples and male same-sex couples

as support for this:

many lesbian couples are not interested in sexual congress at all

when it need not be pointed out to anyone but you "less" comes nowhere close to equalling "none at all".

Of course, that misrepresentation of the article's content pales beside that fact that Dave's selective quoting distorts the tenor of the entire piece, that in fact is a refutation of Dave's claim that lesbians are not interested in sex:

However, some scholars have been critical of using these results to support the existence of “lesbian bed death” because they fail to take into account how much time women in same-sex relationships actually spend on each sexual event.

Consistent with past research, women in same-sex relationships reported having sex significantly less often than persons in both mixed-sex and male same-sex relationships. However, women in same-sex relationships reported significantly longer durations of sexual activity than all other groups.

Consider this: for women in same-sex relationships, the median (50th percentile) time spent on sex was 30-45 minutes; in comparison, the median for everyone else was 15-30 minutes. It is also worth noting about 20% of women in same-sex relationships reported spending an hour or more on sex, while durations of this length were far less common among the other types of couples studied.

It is also worth noting that there were no differences in sexual satisfaction across couple types. This suggests that the group differences in sexual frequency were counterbalanced by the group differences in sexual duration.

These findings are another nail in the coffin for the notion of “lesbian bed death.” Although women in same-sex relationships may be having sex less often than other types of couples, they appear to make their time count and seem to be just as sexually satisfied as everyone else.

Another swing and a miss for the Davester.

[wesw]

it only takes 15 minutes if you do it right......

maybe it takes lesbians longer because they don t have a penis.

not that I m defending any of dave s points, I m just trying to annoy scooter....

[oldr_n_wsr]

it only takes 15 minutes if you do it right......

Depends on the "goal". If a quick orgasm is the "goal" then yes.
If mutual mental and physical intimacy is the "goal", then no. An hour or more is our norm.

[wesw]

well, if you re gonna count the foreplay time, it sometimes takes me a week........

[Lord Jim]

Gee, from the last few posts, I'm learning all kinds of things here that I absolutely positively did not need to know...

[MajGenl.Meade]

well, if you re gonna count the foreplay time, it sometimes takes me a week........

... and chloroform

[Lord Jim]

[Big RR]

Choloroform? Mr Cosby?

[BoSoxGal]

it only takes 15 minutes if you do it right......

Depends on the "goal". If a quick orgasm is the "goal" then yes.
If mutual mental and physical intimacy is the "goal", then no. An hour or more is our norm.

Good for you, oldr!

[Gob]

A woman who ran into a grandmother in a small Ohio town said she was driving erratically because she was praying.
Police originally thought that Marilyn Perry, now 63, of Lindsey, may have been her cell phone or drunk when she crashed into Pamela Beckham, 50, while driving in downtown Bellevue last year.
Beckham, who was helping her grandchildren get out of a car in front of a public library at the time, suffered a broken neck in the accident.
Perry says that she had been praying to God for help with her personal problems.
She was initially charged with operating a vehicle while impaired but no alcohol was found in her system and an investigation showed she was not using her phone.
Police were also not able to isolate a particular drug that influenced her driving.
Despite claiming that she was praying, the driver was accepted into a substance abuse program on Thursday after applying for intervention.
She had asked for the option after pleading guilty to a subsequent vehicular assault charge, according to the Bellevue Gazette.
Perry was also given three years' probation and ordered to pay Beckham up to $10,000 in restitution for medical bills.

[rubato]

No alcohol or drugs detected but she was sent to a substance abuse program? I don't get it.

But then I don't see why it is in this thread either.


yrs,
rubato

[MajGenl.Meade]

rubato wrote: she was sent to a substance abuse program? I don't get it.

the driver was accepted into a substance abuse program on Thursday after applying for intervention.
She had asked for the option after pleading guilty to a subsequent vehicular assault charge

I've highlighted the parts you didn't get

[Gob]

The things he does not understand would fill many books.

[rubato]

rubato wrote: she was sent to a substance abuse program? I don't get it.

the driver was accepted into a substance abuse program on Thursday after applying for intervention.
She had asked for the option after pleading guilty to a subsequent vehicular assault charge

I've highlighted the parts you didn't get

No explanation of why she was sent to a substance ab. Program after she had applied, even though there was no alcohol found in her system and hence no evidence alcohol was a factor in this story.

So there is no connection to the story which you have shown.

And no explanation why it is in this thread.

Strive to be more cogent in future.



Yrs,
Rubato