2013 only a good year for Denver airport

All things philosophical, related to belief and / or religions of any and all sorts.
Personal philosophy welcomed.
User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21232
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

because of course, 2012 sees the end of the entire world.... and some have foreseen the way out (must not be through baggage handling areas). I'm booked to fly or hide on December 1st (you have to check in early)
No one is hiding the purpose of the Denver International Airport. An apocalyptic horse with glowing red eyes greets you at the entrance. Murals of the Children of the World handing over their weapons to a German Boy line the walls. Below, there are underground Bunkers designed to house hundreds of thousands. The perimeter is a Concentration Camp Style wire fence. And the runways are shaped like Swastika's. What the hell is going on ?

It seems pretty obvious that the Denver International Airport is a place where many will be safely housed during the tribulations of 2012. Under the cover of building an airport , insiders went fantastically over budget, building a protective bunker for one group of 2012 survivors. From the glowing red eyes of the apocolyptic horse that greets you at the entry to the strange , strange mural , that seems to explain the survivor's role in the New World Order.

Just in case the leaders and handlers don't survive some of the first changes of 2012, detailed instructons have been left for the inhabitants of the New Earth

Image

What exactly is the "New World Airport Commission" ????? And how convenient that there is a "time capsule" buried beneath. Sounds like an instruction manual at the care and maintance of Denver International , (the cradle of civilization ?)
All this and Yoko Ono at http://www.2012danger.com

Meade

PS I hope this hasn't been done already
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by dales »

A Masonic plot?

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

Big RR
Posts: 14748
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by Big RR »

Only the higher level masons, the shriners. They'll send in the clowns.

Watch out, their shoes are IEDs and explode.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by Gob »

Image

The Denver International Airport has something no other airport in the world has. Or, for that matter, wants. It's a statue of a horse called El Mesteno, and its demonic gaze is the very first thing greeting you when you step out of the airport building:

Image

Hey, did we mention that it's 32 feet tall? Yeah, we're thinking the people in charge of erecting El Mesteno probably should've taken the hint when it straight-up killed its sculptor.
Luis Jimenez or Luis Jiménez (July 30, 1940 – June 13, 2006) was an American sculptor of Mexican descent.[1] He was born in El Paso, Texas and died in New Mexico. He studied art and architecture at the University of Texas in Austin and El Paso, earning a bachelor's degree in 1964. He became an accomplished artist and taught art at the University of Arizona and later the University of Houston.

Jiménez was known for his large polychromed fiberglass sculptures usually of Southwestern and Hispanic themes. His works were often controversial and eminently recognizable because of their themes and the bright, colorful undulating surfaces that Jiménez employed. In 1998 he received a Distinguished Alumni award from the University of Texas in recognition of his artwork.

He was killed in his studio on June 13, 2006 when a large section of Blue Mustang, intended for Denver International Airport, fell on him and severed an artery in his leg.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by rubato »

What happens when the Broncos are moved to San Antonio?

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by loCAtek »

Probably the same thing that will happen (or not happen) to the San Francisco 49er's;
In 2014, their stadium in Santa Clara will be complete, and become the team's new home.

Yay!
Image

Many fans (particularly those with permanent tribute tattoos) were relieved to hear that the team's name will not be changed.
No 'Santa Clara 49's' in the future.

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by Jarlaxle »

You mean they are finally out of one of the worst sports stadiums in the country?
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by dales »

Have you ever been to Candlestick or are you blowin' smoke as usual?

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by rubato »

And its been earthquake-tested.

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by loCAtek »

Previous plans

The San Francisco 49ers have played at Candlestick Park since 1971. The stadium is a sentimental fan-favorite and has housed all 5 Super Bowl Championship teams. It is however the oldest unrenovated stadium in the NFL and is beginning to show its age. The 49ers have been pursuing a new stadium since 1997, when a plan for a stadium and a mall at Candlestick Point passed a public vote. When the plans failed to move forward, the San Francisco 49ers presented an alternative plan on July 18, 2006, to construct a new 68,500-seat, open air stadium as part of a mixed use development featuring housing, commercial and retail space. In November 2006 the team announced that plans for a new stadium at Candlestick Point was not feasible, “citing extensive costs for infrastructure, parking accommodations and other changes that would cost more than the stadium itself”.[11] The 49ers are now focused on making Santa Clara the home to their new stadium.

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by Jarlaxle »

dales wrote:Have you ever been to Candlestick or are you blowin' smoke as usual?
See one concrete donut, you've seen them all. Been to one, it sucked...and that was without Candlestick's damp, raw chill.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by dales »

Spoken like a true authority. :lol:

"Fenway's a DUMP!"

It would be like posting the above withoiut actually having been there.

Am I comparing Candlestick to Fenway?

Hardly.....only the gaul.

I love how certain posters here dump on anything Californian having never set foot here. :lol:

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by dales »

loCAtek wrote:
Previous plans

The San Francisco 49ers have played at Candlestick Park since 1971. The stadium is a sentimental fan-favorite and has housed all 5 Super Bowl Championship teams. It is however the oldest unrenovated stadium in the NFL and is beginning to show its age. The 49ers have been pursuing a new stadium since 1997, when a plan for a stadium and a mall at Candlestick Point passed a public vote. When the plans failed to move forward, the San Francisco 49ers presented an alternative plan on July 18, 2006, to construct a new 68,500-seat, open air stadium as part of a mixed use development featuring housing, commercial and retail space. In November 2006 the team announced that plans for a new stadium at Candlestick Point was not feasible, “citing extensive costs for infrastructure, parking accommodations and other changes that would cost more than the stadium itself”.[11] The 49ers are now focused on making Santa Clara the home to their new stadium.
:ok

SF screwed the pooch by dithering around too long.

Look for Oakland to lose the A's to the south bay and the Warriors possibly to SF. :ok

Oakland deserves the raiderz.

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21232
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

dales wrote:Spoken like a true authority. :lol:

"Fenway's a DUMP!"

It would be like posting the above withoiut actually having been there.

Am I comparing Candlestick to Fenway?

Hardly.....only the gaul.

I love how certain posters here dump on anything Californian having never set foot here. :lol:

Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres. Roughly translated: this is to make LJ happy

Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by Jarlaxle »

dales wrote:Spoken like a true authority. :lol:

"Fenway's a DUMP!"

It would be like posting the above withoiut actually having been there.

Am I comparing Candlestick to Fenway?

Hardly.....only the gaul.

I love how certain posters here dump on anything Californian having never set foot here. :lol:
Fenway has been totally renovated in the last ten years...and I wasn't comparing the cavernous, windswept concrete donut to Fenway Park. It has been a very long time since the Patriots played at Fenway!
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by dales »

Speaking of Julius Ceasar........

Nixxxon at Candlestick on Opening Day

Image

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6721
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by Long Run »

Well, having been to Candlestick for both baseball and football, and having countless reports from others, I can say it was a bad idea from day one, and a shining example of how local governments can make backroom deals that benefit a couple of friends at the expense of millions of others who have to live with a bad plan for 50 years. It would make more sense for the 49ers to return to their original home at Kezar (which would be really dumb) than to put any more money into Candlestick.

As for the Denver airport, its nice to hear that despite its early problems, it is no Candlestick Park!

Big RR
Posts: 14748
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by Big RR »

Well, I agree Candlestick is not the best venue for football (I saw the 49ers several times, but never baseball), it is hardly the worst (I save that for Shea and Yankee stadiums--the only places that the Meadowlands would be an improvement on). A nice chill in the air, confounding winds, chilling dampness, all contributing to the fun of the game.

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Shea is gone and so is the "old" Yankee stadium While I have not been to either of the new statiums, I have been to the nes meadowlands stadium (Met life???) and found it pretty good. Had seat on the top row, 50yard line and I thought the view was great for watching the Jets. They even won (early last year). Tailgaiting was great too.

Big RR
Posts: 14748
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: 2013 only a good year for Denver airport

Post by Big RR »

Tailgating is fun, but at least the old stadium was overly cold and many of the seats appear to have been in a wind tunnel worse than anything I ever experienced at Candlestick. I was only at the new Meadowlands stadium once, but it was in the fall so I really can't evaluate it. I willl say, though, that it's a horrible choice for the Superbowl in 2014.

Post Reply