They don't call him "Dick" for nothing

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9101
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

They don't call him "Dick" for nothing

Post by Sue U »

The former vice president, so horribly wrong in virtually every policy decision his administration made and so clueless about the consequences, doubles down on his asshattery while politicizing a non-partisan event:
Some Wyoming Lawyers Upset About Cheney Speech
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Sep 4, 2014, 2:28 PM ET
By BEN NEARY Associated Press
Associated Press

Former Vice President Dick Cheney can be a polarizing figure even six years out of office.

The Wyoming State Bar invited Cheney, a prominent Republican with deep Wyoming ties, to be keynote speaker at its annual convention next week.

Some lawyers are objecting — both to Cheney's selection and to how the bar announced his appearance.

The state bar is a quasi-governmental entity that administers the legal profession using some taxpayer money. In its announcement of Cheney's speech, it published an unedited biography submitted by Cheney in which he criticized President Barack Obama, saying he weakened the United States' security posture.

The biography submitted by Cheney noted that he and former President George W. Bush left office in January 2009.

"Shortly thereafter, President Obama began to dismantle the security policies that had kept the nation safe," the Cheney biography stated. "His policy decisions have led to a reversal of the gains America made in the war on terror in countries like Iraq and Afghanistan, and a weakening of America across the globe."

Sharon Wilkinson, executive director of the state bar, said Cheney's office provided the biographical information and that the bar ran it without editing it.

The latest edition of the state bar magazine, Wyoming Lawyer, featured an apology from the bar for running Cheney's material.

"Certain remarks that appeared in Vice President Cheney's biography in the annual meeting registration materials have prompted expressions of concern from several members who viewed those comments as inappropriate for a Wyoming State Bar publication," said the editor's note in the magazine. It said the bar would re-examine its longstanding practice of running speakers' biographical materials without editing them.

Wilkinson said the bar heard from a handful of lawyers who said they wouldn't attend the convention because of its choice of Cheney as keynote speaker. "And as you can imagine, many are thrilled with our choice and are looking forward to attending," she said.

Cheyenne lawyer and Democratic state legislator Mary Throne is among those who say they won't attend.

"Obviously, I have a lot of respect for the office of vice president and his service to Wyoming," Throne said of Cheney. "It does seem an odd choice for a bar banquet. Traditionally, it's somebody with a legal background, and not someone who's so active in politics, frankly. So, I do not plan on attending the banquet."

William McKellar, a Cheyenne lawyer, is past president of the Wyoming Trial Lawyers Association. He said there was an active online discussion among association members about the choice of Cheney.

"A lot of the attorneys that were members of the Wyoming Trial Lawyers Association expressed disappointment, concern, whatever, regarding Dick Cheney's appearance at the Wyoming State Bar feeling that it was inappropriate," McKellar said.

"I took exception to those comments," McKellar said. "I'm not a dyed-in-the-wool Dick Cheney supporter. On the other hand, I think he's a great American and has done a great service for the United States and the state of Wyoming, and I think it's totally appropriate and proper for Vice President Cheney to come and speak at an association such as the Wyoming State Bar Convention."

McKellar said he believes that if Obama were coming to address the convention, "there would have been no objections raised whatsoever."

Riverton lawyer Jeff Stanbury said he believes the state bar had the best of intentions in inviting Cheney to speak.

"I fully recognize the state bar's desire to have such a high-profile speaker, particularly from our state," Stanbury said, adding that no one should be prevented from speaking on the basis of their political views.

"What I do take issue with is the statement in the biography making a declaration which is very debatable as though it is fact and present it as though it's on behalf of the state bar and its members who are part of that association," Stanbury said.
Here's a guy whose foreign policy initiatives included a bungled adventure in Afghanistan, a wholly unnecessary debacle in Iraq and the needless alienation of America's allies; who should probably be in jail for war crimes as an architect of "enhanced interrogation techniques"; who secretly colluded with Enron in an effort to paper over its fraud; who refused to comply with National Archives requirements for protection of governmental records in order to keep his documents secret; whose office leaked the identity of a CIA field officer to politically undermine her husband; and who did everything he could to create an imperial and unaccountable executive. And this is the guy who now presumes to lecture the successor administration on its supposed policy failings?

Asshole.
GAH!

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: They don't call him "Dick" for nothing

Post by Long Run »

Yes, he seems to be legally blind when it comes to his failings and bad calls, and equally clueless that no one (right or left) cares to have him continue to make his case. However, having served in the offices he has held, he should be a perfectly fine choice to speak at this type of an event, as long as he doesn't use it as a soap box (would he agree to this?).

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: They don't call him "Dick" for nothing

Post by Guinevere »

Of course he is going to use it as a soapbox - so does pretty much everyone.

And Sue, tell us how you really feel dear :mrgreen:
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9101
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: They don't call him "Dick" for nothing

Post by Sue U »

Long Run wrote:Yes, he seems to be legally blind when it comes to his failings and bad calls, and equally clueless that no one (right or left) cares to have him continue to make his case. However, having served in the offices he has held, he should be a perfectly fine choice to speak at this type of an event, as long as he doesn't use it as a soap box (would he agree to this?).
I agree that in principle, there is nothing wrong with inviting a former vice president to be keynote speaker at a bar convention. However, a bar convention -- particularly for an integrated bar -- must be a strictly non-partisan affair, and speakers should understand that. If Cheney were addressing issues specifically relevant to the bar and the judiciary, or even issues of governance generally, that would be fine. But since he left office, I have not seen him in any appearance where he did not first and foremost attempt to rationalize and justify the choices of his administration while bashing the current government, all with highly partisan rhetoric. He seems congenitally unable to talk about anything else.

I guess if his speech were titled "How To Avoid Prosecution For War Crimes: A Personal Perspective," that might reasonably fit in with the forum.
Guinevere wrote:And Sue, tell us how you really feel dear :mrgreen:
I could, but my mama's still alive and she don't like it when I use those words -- at least not before she's done with them herself. :lol:
GAH!

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: They don't call him "Dick" for nothing

Post by Lord Jim »

Well, it seems to me that if you book Dick Cheney to speak at an event, you know going in what to expect...

He hasn't exactly been shy about his criticisms of the current administration; as Sue points out:
I have not seen him in any appearance where he did not first and foremost attempt to rationalize and justify the choices of his administration while bashing the current government, all with highly partisan rhetoric.
Presumably this does not come as news to the bar event organizers, so my guess would be that the purpose of the selection was to draw publicity and stir up attention...

They appear to have succeeded in this regard...
ImageImageImage

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: They don't call him "Dick" for nothing

Post by rubato »

Worst administration in 100 years. Not surprising that he is obsessed with self-justification.

Meanwhile, GW seems to be laying low. Incipient post-alcoholic dementia, or modesty?

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20047
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: They don't call him "Dick" for nothing

Post by BoSoxGal »

He's too busy making more of that brilliant art, no doubt. :roll:
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Post Reply