epa report on bees
Re: epa report on bees
first link is to mother jones, sorry
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... 6085,d.eWE
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... 6085,d.eWE
wesw. HERE'S A THOUGHT
Once you find the link that finally works properly go back and delete all the broken links you posted. Your repetitious nonsense is really getting tedious, man. You'll thank me later.

“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.”
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9795
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas
Re: wesw. HERE'S A THOUGHT
I was thinking maybe he could practice reading the links and then putting the gist of it into his own words. Leave the link/URL at the end for those of us who may want to read more about it.RayThom wrote:Once you find the link that finally works properly go back and delete all the broken links you posted. Your repetitious nonsense is really getting tedious, man. You'll thank me later.
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Re: epa report on bees
I think that both links work, I just don t like mother jones....
and bill, i just can t win in that regard. i would rather do as you suggested, but then others say...
link?
what, no link?
it would be really nice if you gave enough of a shit to post a link, you beast!!!!
(i made the last one up, but only just...)
and bill, i just can t win in that regard. i would rather do as you suggested, but then others say...
link?
what, no link?
it would be really nice if you gave enough of a shit to post a link, you beast!!!!
(i made the last one up, but only just...)
Re: epa report on bees
Jim Jones, Assistant Administrator. Wow. I worked with him when I was a young EPA staffer and he was the special assistant to the Assistant Administrator. The chess pieces may move around, but they sure don't change much.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9795
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas
Re: epa report on bees
Ahem ..... read *ALL* of my post the next time, OK?wesw wrote:and bill, i just can t win in that regard. i would rather do as you suggested, but then others say...
link? what, no link?
it would be really nice if you gave enough of a shit to post a link, you beast!!!!
(i made the last one up, but only just...)
I was thinking maybe he could practice reading the links and then putting the gist of it into his own words. Leave the link/URL at the end for those of us who may want to read more about it.
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Re: epa report on bees
Seems the bee post created another hornet's nest.
Re: epa report on bees
ok, the neonicotinoids have been a known cause of colony collapse disorder for 20 yrs and it has been covered up by the chemical companies and their paid off lackeys in our, and other , govts....
greedy corrupt bastards.
....and now for something completely different....
...rube, I would really like to know your take on this.
greedy corrupt bastards.
....and now for something completely different....
...rube, I would really like to know your take on this.
Re: epa report on bees
EPA has only once banned a pesticide because of ecological (non-human health) effects. Once. And you may thank yours truly for pushing and advocating and making that happen.
Because pesticides are actually necessary in some cases (although the amount and scale is clearly debatable), they are required to be regulated based on balancing the risks (toxicity x exposure) against the benefits (typically economic impact to the user). It makes for a difficult calculation since the impact of no use is incredibly difficult to quantify.
There has been no cover-up. I know all the pesticide folks. Colony collapse has not been widely studied until recently, and EPA has been overly focused on the food supply (per Congress and its last revisions to FIFRA - the federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act).
Because pesticides are actually necessary in some cases (although the amount and scale is clearly debatable), they are required to be regulated based on balancing the risks (toxicity x exposure) against the benefits (typically economic impact to the user). It makes for a difficult calculation since the impact of no use is incredibly difficult to quantify.
There has been no cover-up. I know all the pesticide folks. Colony collapse has not been widely studied until recently, and EPA has been overly focused on the food supply (per Congress and its last revisions to FIFRA - the federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act).
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9795
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas
Re: epa report on bees
Are you trying to tell us that *YOU* were responsible for the banning of DDT?Guinevere wrote:EPA has only once banned a pesticide because of ecological (non-human health) effects. Once. And you may thank yours truly for pushing and advocating and making that happen
Maybe you should be using "Rachel Carson" as your handle and something like this

as your avatar.
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Re: epa report on bees
Sorry, since DDT. Although in fact, DDT was only banned by EPA because of a court order not because of its regulatory responsibilities (and the process was started first by President Kennedy and the Science Advisory Committee before EPA even existed).
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Re: epa report on bees
I didn't think you were old enough to be working in 1972.Guinevere wrote:EPA has only once banned a pesticide because of ecological (non-human health) effects. Once. And you may thank yours truly for pushing and advocating and making that happen. ... act).
Yrs,
Rubato
Re: epa report on bees
maybe it hasn t been widely studied, but it was studied and blamed on these same pesticides 20 yrs ago, by a narrow group of folks who didn t give a shit about the pesticide folks or their blood money
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21467
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: epa report on bees
rubato wrote:I didn't think you were old enough to be working in 1972.Guinevere wrote:EPA has only once banned a pesticide because of ecological (non-human health) effects. Once. And you may thank yours truly for pushing and advocating and making that happen. ... act).
Yrs,
Rubato
Some part of "since DDT" in Guin's explanatory message above that you missed?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: epa report on bees
That post was not visible when I posted.
My iPad is loading funny on the local wifi. No idea why.
Yrs,
Rubato
My iPad is loading funny on the local wifi. No idea why.
Yrs,
Rubato
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21467
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: epa report on bees
OK 
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts