Any Tramp Defenders Here? - dagnabbit, I meant TRUMP!

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Any Tramp Defenders Here? - dagnabbit, I meant TRUMP!

Post by dales »

Not that I would readily admit to being one.

I have noticed of late that wesw is absent.
Last edited by dales on Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Any Tramp Defenders Here?

Post by Lord Jim »

He was here just earlier this afternoon:

Last visited:
Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:46 pm
memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=86237
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20056
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Any Tramp Defenders Here? - dagnabbit, I meant TRUMP!

Post by BoSoxGal »

dales wrote:I have noticed of late that wesw is absent.
No such luck! :nana
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Beer Sponge
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:31 pm

Re: Any Tramp Defenders Here? - dagnabbit, I meant TRUMP!

Post by Beer Sponge »

west is absent even when he is here...
Personally, I don’t believe in bros before hoes, or hoes before bros. There needs to be a balance. A homie-hoe-stasis, if you will.

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9796
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Any Tramp Defenders Here? - dagnabbit, I meant TRUMP!

Post by Bicycle Bill »

I've been riding him a little harder than normal the past few days; maybe I hurt his widdle feelings.
We can only hope.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

Post Reply