Trump Should Be Sued For Breach Of Contract...

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Trump Should Be Sued For Breach Of Contract...

Post by Lord Jim »

Here's everything Trump promised to do in his first 100 days. He's done almost none of it.

Before President Trump scoffed at the "ridiculous standard" of measuring a leader's success by his first 100 days in office, he signed and delivered a two-page contract outlining his "100-day action plan to Make America Great Again." But unless Trump gets really, really busy between now and April 29, when he hits 100 days as president, it's looking like he won't exactly check off every promise he made in his "contract with the American voter."

On the first page of the contract, which Trump released when he was still running for office, he pledged to pursue "six measures to clean up the corruption and special interest collusion in Washington, D.C.," "seven actions to protect American workers," and "five actions to restore security and the constitutional rule of law."

Those actions included labeling China a currency manipulator (he announced earlier this month he now thinks the Chinese are "not currency manipulators") and suspending immigration for "terror-prone regions" (both of his immigration executive orders have been blocked by federal judges). He has, however, made headway on getting his Supreme Court pick confirmed, rolling back regulations, and pushing "clean coal."

His second page lists the legislative goals he planned to work on with Congress — and boasts even fewer successes. Trump had promised he'd repeal and replace ObamaCare, pass a "middle class tax relief and simplification act," enact an "affordable childcare and eldercare act," and get his proposed U.S.-Mexico border wall fully funded with "the full understanding that the country of Mexico will be reimbursing the United States for the full cost." None of that has happened.

Trump capped off his lengthy list of promises with the bolded line, "This is my pledge to you." "And if we follow these steps, we will once more have a government of, by, and for the people," the contract said.
http://theweek.com/speedreads/693812/he ... lmost-none

Trump is like a 10 year old kid who brags about how he's going to win a board game, and then when he's losing while they're actually playing declares, "This is a stupid game!"

Here's a link to the "contract":

https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landin ... actv02.pdf
Fact Checker: President Trump’s claim that “no administration has accomplished more in the first 90 days”

So far President Trump has not even taken action on 60 percent of the promises he made for his first 100 days in office – and he’s broken five of them

By Glenn Kessler | The Washington Post
“No administration has accomplished more in the first 90 days.”

– President Trump, remarks in Kenosha, Wis., April 18, 2017
The first 100 days of a presidency is a rather artificial milestone, but one by which all presidents have been measured since Franklin D. Roosevelt’s whirlwind of action when he took office in the midst of the Great Depression. President Donald Trump appears especially conscious of this marker. During the presidential campaign, he even issued a list of 60 promises that he said he would fulfill in his first 100 days.

We’ve been tracking Trump’s promises, and so far he has not even taken action on 60 percent of the promises – and he’s broken five of them, such as his promise to label China as a currency manipulator.

Yet here’s the president declaring that he’s accomplished more in his first 90 days than any previous president. So how does he stack up?

There are various ways to measure presidential performance, such as number of laws passed. But of course not every law is created equally, so you have to parse through the data. The same goes for executive orders and memorandums.

We sought an explanation from the White House for Trump’s claim but did not get an answer. However, White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Wednesday was asked what single piece of legislation the president was most proud of in his first 100 days.

Spicer did not really answer the question[ because, well, there isn't an answer] but instead responded with a laundry list that he said demonstrated a “very robust agenda of activity,” such as reversing a dozen regulations set by President Barack Obama and the Senate confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Neil M. Gorsuch. He also noted a drop in illegal immigration at the southern border and “a lot of activity that we’ve been very proud to see in America manufacturing and job creation” – claims we have fact-checked in the past.

Frankly, this is rather thin gruel if you are going to compare yourself to Roosevelt or other notable presidents. So let’s go through the data.

There were 76 bills signed into law under Roosevelt in the first 100 days, compared with 28 (with a week to go) under Trump. “This is higher than any first-term 100 days since 1949 (55 bills signed), but less than all first terms from 1901-1949 except for 1909,” said John Frendreis, a political science professor at Loyola University in Chicago who co-wrote a well-regarded study of legislative output in the first 100 days.

Thirteen of the Trump bills disapprove of major regulations put in place by Obama, which signifies a reversal of action, not new action — though the agency is barred from ever re-promulgating the rule in question or anything similar without congressional approval. Other bills include such actions – what Frendreis called “minor or housekeeping bills” – as naming a Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Pago Pago in American Samoa or creating a waiver to allow Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to be appointed even though he had recently served in the military.

Moreover, none of Trump’s bills can be considered “major” legislation according to political science standards, whereas at least nine of Roosevelt’s bills met that standard. Historians H.W. Brands of the University of Texas at Austin and David M. Kennedy of Stanford University count 15 major bills in FDR’s first 100 days, including some that remain in place.

“In this regard, Trump’s tenure has been less impressive, with no major pieces of legislation passed,” Frendreis said. “By contrast, the stimulus package was passed during Obama’s first 100 days” – actually, within Obama’s first 30 days.

Frendreis noted that the 73rd Congress was highly unusual because of the crisis atmosphere and the huge Democratic majorities, giving Roosevelt an opportunity to make a quick impact.

“Some of FDR’s initiatives were submitted to Congress in the morning and back on his desk that very same day for signatures,” said Max J. Skidmore, a political science professor at the University of Missouri in Kansas City. “Hardly anything other than the most extreme of emergencies could bring that about.”

“FDR’s first session of Congress was a special session he himself had called,” Brands said. “He also had the advantage of preparation, having been governor of New York for four years, three of them Depression years. So he knew what he wanted, what was popular and what might work. Trump is a novice.”

As for executive actions, Trump has issued 24 executive orders, 22 presidential memorandums and 20 proclamations. One of his executive orders, imposing a travel ban from certain Muslim-majority countries, was a redo of an earlier executive order that had been blocked in the courts. But the new one has also been stymied by court challenges and thus has not been implemented.

To some extent, it’s difficult to compare executive orders and memorandums among presidents, because only executive orders are numbered, but it’s somewhat arbitrary how something is labeled. In any case, Trump’s first 90 days of executive actions does not stand out as especially unusual.

Meanwhile, Trump is woefully behind in presidential appointments, especially in naming people for Senate-confirmed posts.

In contrast to many other presidents, Trump has also not led on legislation but mostly taken his cue from Congress.

At this point, President George W. Bush was well ahead in ensuring passage of a major tax cut that he had pressed for in the election campaign. He proposed comprehensive tax legislation on Feb. 9, about three weeks after taking office, and a $1.35 trillion tax cut was passed by both houses of Congress by May 26, less than a month after Bush’s first 100 days was completed. Trump has yet to release a tax plan – and his bid to repeal and replace Obama’s signature health-care law was blocked in the House.

“Trump’s ‘skinny’ budget is not a strong start on the budget issue, even for a first-term president,” Frendreis said, adding that “my own professional judgment is that he is off to a slower-than-normal start.”

Few presidents achieve much on foreign policy in their first 100 days, and Trump is no exception. Trump has signaled a tougher posture toward North Korea and Iran and launched a brief volley of cruise missiles to punish Syria for a chemical-weapons attack. But it’s too early to tell whether his policies will result in positive outcomes.

“Trump actually is unusual for his first 100 days, but for a reason opposite of what he said,” said Skidmore, author of “Presidential Performance: A Comprehensive Review.” “Not only has he accomplished almost nothing, but rather his initiatives (executive orders stayed by courts, a major legislative proposal failing even to come to a vote when his party controls both houses, etc.) have notoriously been unsuccessful.”

“FDR definitely outclasses Trump,” Brands said. “Fifteen major bills through Congress, to zero for Trump.”



It’s rather silly for any president to suggest that his first 100 days somehow topped Roosevelt’s achievement. Lyndon B. Johnson, Ronald Reagan and Obama are credited with significant legislative achievements early in their first terms, but much of their success generally came after the first 100 days. Trump would be well advised to not make such a big deal about this because the available evidence shows that he in no way comes close to matching FDR’s record.

Four Pinocchios
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sun Apr 23, 2017 1:26 pm, edited 3 times in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Trump Should Be Sued For Breach Of Contract...

Post by Guinevere »

You do know campaign promises are not binding in any way. I sure wouldn't waste my time or the Court's time on such schlock, especially when there are far better and far more important cases to prosecute against the head Trumpanzee and his family. Such as:

Emoluments/Old Post Office lease
Immigration and entry Executive orders
Sanctuary cities EO
Fraud in Trump U
Sexual harassment
Failure to pay contractors
Encouraging violence at rallies/bribery/collusion


That's a 30-second top of my head list. I'm sure there is much much more.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5808
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Trump Should Be Sued For Breach Of Contract...

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

I know that the question ('Can we sue the fucker?') was not altogether serious, but I think that a good case can be made for suing Scott Pruitt for willfully ignoring the EPA's scientific integrity policy.

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/fi ... y_2012.pdf

Among other things, all employees, including political appointees, are required to "Appropriately characterize, convey, and acknowledge the intellectual contributions of others." just taking one clause in isolation. (There are 14 pages of this policy.) Pruitt's pronouncements on climate change drive a truck through this policy.

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17271
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Trump Should Be Sued For Breach Of Contract...

Post by Scooter »

It's interesting that only a few weeks after saying that the U.S.-Canada trade relationship needed "minor tweaking", Trump came out last week with both barrels, claiming that the U.S. is being screwed over by NAFTA on dairy, lumber and energy, proving that NAFTA must be majorly renegotiated.

Only one problem, NAFTA isn't responsible for any of the of the alleged injuries being suffered by U.S. businesses in these industries.

NAFTA does not regulate the Canada-US dairy trade, each country has their own approach to supply management that neither was ever going to give up. Apparently some pricing changes that are, as a package, revenue neutral for Canadian dairy producers , are sending Wisconsin dairy farmers to the poor house. Never mind that Canada exports about $100 million in dairy products to the US and imports more than five times that much from the US. If he's thinking countervailing duties, he ought to think about who has the most to lose.

The softwood lumber dispute raged on for 25 years before a software lumber agreement (again, distinct from NAFTA except for enforcing compliance) brought uneasy peace for ten years. It expired in 2015 and the US has been in no rush to sign a new one. Trump is shocked, shocked I tell you, that Canada has not continued to impose the taxes and quotas set out in the agreement after it expired, and imposed a 20% tariff. Which a NAFTA panel and the WTO and the London International Court of Arbitration will once AGAIN rule is unjustified, as was the case pretty much every time it happened before. Because the fact that more sustainable management results in lower royalties doesn't make it a subsidy. Try cutting imports significantly and every industry that relies on lumber will be screaming about the price spikes, like in the 90s.

He gave no clue about what he was on about with energy, the world price of oil and gas is the world price of oil and gas. It's one thing to whine when we can sell something more cheaply than you can, but when the price is the same, how can there be an unfair subsidy?

Ir's as if he pulled a few words out of each conversation he had on his trip, and tossed them together into word salad.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

Post Reply