Trump's New Battleship....

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15407
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Joe Guy »

I got access to a sneak peek of a prototype of Trump's new planned battleship that will be bigger than any ship that has ever been seen before.

That's not Trump, it's a figurehead that will be attached to the bow of each new ship...

USS Trump.jpg

Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Big RR »

AKA Assy McAssface

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21480
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

At least the guns are pointing at the correct target
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Burning Petard
Posts: 4602
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Near Bear, Delaware

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Burning Petard »

Do you know what modern submarine gunners call Battleships and aircraft carriers"








Big, Fat, Easy targets.



snailgate.

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17272
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Scooter »

The ship's guns certainly have a big, fat, easy target, pointed at Trump's corpulent ass.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5815
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

Battleships were vital in the last two world wars. Which ended 107 and 80 years ago.

I am uncertain how much difference they will make in the cheap drone age.

We used to have an Office of Net Assessment run out of the Pentagon, which, according to Wikipedia, was tasked to "develop and coordinate net assessments of the standing, trends, and future prospects of U.S. military capabilities and military potential in comparison with those of other countries or groups of countries in order to identify emerging or future threats or opportunities for the United States." One of Trump and Hegseth's first actions was to abolish this office. Hegseth has told us that abolishing facial hair among the troops is the key to a strong military. Clearly Ulysses S Grant was wrong all those years ago and the Civil War would have ended years before with no loss of life if only he had shaved occasionally. And we won't even mention that dreadfully hirsute Mr Lincoln.

Hegseth and Trump are, of course, playing a clever game by pretending to be morons with no moral sense and very inflated views of their own intelligence and wisdom thus lulling our enemies into a false sense of security.

Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Big RR »

Hegseth and Trump are, of course, playing a clever game by pretending to be morons with no moral sense and very inflated views of their own intelligence and wisdom thus lulling our enemies into a false sense of security.
Yeah, sure--pretending to be morons. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

False sense of security. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9799
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Bicycle Bill »

It would never be the USS Trump unless
  • 1) it included a golf course
    2) all the brasswork was replaced with gold fittings
    3) the final cost was at least three times the original estimates...   but that wouldn't be a problem, as Trump would immediately declare that he'd be making either the Russians or the Chinese pay for it anyway!!
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20072
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by BoSoxGal »

IMG_3373.jpeg
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11661
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Crackpot »

No need for “oxy”
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

liberty
Posts: 4962
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Colonial Possession

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by liberty »

ex-khobar Andy wrote:
Wed Dec 24, 2025 5:24 am
Battleships were vital in the last two world wars. Which ended 107 and 80 years ago.

I am uncertain how much difference they will make in the cheap drone age.

We used to have an Office of Net Assessment run out of the Pentagon, which, according to Wikipedia, was tasked to "develop and coordinate net assessments of the standing, trends, and future prospects of U.S. military capabilities and military potential in comparison with those of other countries or groups of countries in order to identify emerging or future threats or opportunities for the United States." One of Trump and Hegseth's first actions was to abolish this office. Hegseth has told us that abolishing facial hair among the troops is the key to a strong military. Clearly Ulysses S Grant was wrong all those years ago and the Civil War would have ended years before with no loss of life if only he had shaved occasionally. And we won't even mention that dreadfully hirsute Mr Lincoln.

Hegseth and Trump are, of course, playing a clever game by pretending to be morons with no moral sense and very inflated views of their own intelligence and wisdom thus lulling our enemies into a false sense of security.
In survival school, our instructors explained that in situations where nutrition is uncertain and your immune system is weakened, keeping your skin clean reduces the risk of infections that could become serious. Short hair and a smooth face make it easier to maintain hygiene when you’re living in the dirt and don’t have reliable access to water.

Another major reason, and probably the dominant one today, is that you can never be sure what environment you’ll be operating in; if the enemy uses chemical agents, a clean‑shaven face is essential for getting a proper seal on a gas mask.

Of course, the military does made exceptions for cultural or religious reasons, depending on host nation.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.

liberty
Posts: 4962
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Colonial Possession

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by liberty »

Did you know there is talk of replacing the Phalanx Gatling‑gun system used on Navy ships to shoot down incoming projectiles? I think that’s a mistake.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5815
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/ ... ps/685445/

Ukraine Sees the Future of Naval Warfare. Trump Doesn’t.
The balance of power is shifting toward cheap drones and away from expensive ships.

Worth a read.

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9799
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Bicycle Bill »

ex-khobar Andy wrote:
Sat Dec 27, 2025 1:38 pm
Ukraine Sees the Future of Naval Warfare. Trump Doesn’t.
The balance of power is shifting toward cheap drones and away from expensive ships.

Worth a read.
Back in 1907, Teddy Roosevelt sent The Great White Fleet, a group of sixteen US Navy battleships, on a two-year circumnavigation of the globe to showcase American naval power and foster goodwill.   The historic voyage demonstrated U.S. military might, strengthened international relations (especially with Japan), and spurred naval development as well as embodying Roosevelt's "big stick" diplomacy.   Sounds to me like Donny wants to build some new ships and do the same thing himself.   And if he can somehow slap his name/brand/logo/ego onto them, so much the better.

Donny might, however, want to think of potential headlines, and maybe reconsider slapping his name on a warship.   Maybe I have a little bit of a perverse streak in me, as I have to admit I would derive more than just a little satisfaction out of news articles reading something like "Navy Reports Trump Ravaged By Scurvy" or "Trump Runs Aground In Fog" — followed, of course, by "Trump Deemed Irreparable Following Grounding — Will Be Scrapped"...
Image
-"BB""-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21480
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

But the Donald sure has a way of understanding boats 'n stuff:

“There was a major explosion in the dock area where they load the boats up with drugs. They load the boats up with drugs, so we hit all the boats and now we hit the area. It’s the implementation area. There’s where they implement. And that is no longer around”

You can see the work-chain associations in his senile mind:

drugs to boats - boats to area - area to implementation - implementation to blammo!
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15407
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Joe Guy »

I ran Trump's quote through Google Translate and got this:

"Click......whir.....knock......grind.......tick...tick....CLUNK!"

Burning Petard
Posts: 4602
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Near Bear, Delaware

Re: Trump's New Battleship....

Post by Burning Petard »

I think this one is dead in the water. It will be a miracle if the design can be completed before the next CinC is sworn in, let alone lay the keel. It makes more sense to design a new electric submarine powered by solar panels.

snailgate.

Post Reply