Terrorist Blonde Woman Rams ICE Vehicle!!

[Sue U]

.......And to add insult to injury the VP just spoke in a press conference declaring that the ICE officer has absolute immunity for his conduct.....

Isn't that the same as telling ICE officers it's okay to shoot anyone they feel like shooting?

It sure seems they've already been told that:

US immigration agents linked to spike in shootings under Trump administration crackdown
Data compiled by news non-profit the Trace shows 14 firearm incidents and more uses of force cases

Marina Dunbar
Wed 7 Jan 2026 15.55 EST

Federal immigration agents have been involved in a sharp rise in shootings in recent months, coinciding with the Trump administration’s expanded immigration enforcement efforts.

Under Trump’s crackdown, immigration officers have been connected to 14 shootings, according to data compiled by the Trace, a non-profit newsroom focused on gun violence in the US.

The newsroom relied on Gun Violence Archive data and media reports to document incidents in which federal agents either shot someone or held individuals at gunpoint during immigration enforcement operations carried out under Donald Trump’s crackdown. As of 7 January, it identified 28 incidents overall, including the 14 shootings. Since July, when the first shooting occurred under the administration, immigration agents have killed four people and injured five more.

The figures probably underestimate the true number of incidents, since shootings involving immigration agents are not consistently made public, the Trace cautioned.

Beyond shootings with firearms, 13 cases in which immigration agents used less-lethal weapons such as rubber bullets or pepper balls were also documented. Ten of those incidents took place during protests. Among those injured were two pastors who were shot with pepper balls while leading prayers at demonstrations in California and Illinois.

The most recent shooting occurred Wednesday in Minneapolis, where federal agents fatally shot a woman during a large-scale immigration enforcement action. Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democratic congresswoman from Minnesota, said the victim was “a legal observer” of ICE activity after a surge of agents was deployed to the city amid allegations of fraud involving Somali residents.

***

The first year of Trump’s second term has been deadlier than 2020, when deaths in detention facilities spiked amid the unchecked Covid-19 pandemic, according to the American Immigration Council. The organization attributes the rising death toll this year to a combination of factors, including overcrowding, poor detention conditions, medical neglect, escalating mental health crises and gun violence.

In addition to the 14 shootings involving ICE agents, 32 people died in ICE custody in 2025. That figure makes 2025 the deadliest year for the agency in more than 20 years and matches the previous record high set in 2004, as the administration moved to detain an unprecedented number of people.

ETA:

Source: The Grauniad

[ex-khobar Andy]

From the DOJ's website: https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-depa ... -use-force

My bolding for emphasis:

1-16.200 - USE OF DEADLY FORCE AND PROHIBITED RESTRAINT TECHNIQUES

A. Deadly Force

Law enforcement and correctional officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person.

1. Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect.

2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force.

Seems pretty clear to me.

[liberty]

The only comfort I can find in trying to grapple with this latest horrific murder of an innocent by law enforcement is knowing that juries in Minneapolis have little difficulty convicting law enforcement murderers so they can rot in prison for their crimes.

Don’t read this if you have blood pressure issues and you haven’t taken your medication!!

Weren’t you once a supporter of the Supremacy Clause? There’s a pretty simple point here: it doesn’t exist to give the federal government unlimited power to do whatever it wants. It exists to prevent states, and their subordinate units, from hamstringing the federal government in the performance of its constitutional duties.

I keep hearing people on the news saying they want ICE out of their city. Well, it’s not their city in that sense. It’s not the “United States of Minneapolis,” and it’s not the “United States of Minnesota.” That city is part of the United States. And when they claim they “have to be part of the investigation,” no, they don’t. It’s a federal matter, and it’s none of their business. The federal government is not subject to the will of Minneapolis or the state of Minnesota.

Be consistent, that’s all I’m saying. Don’t change your principles just because the situation changes.

The federal agent who shot Randy Weaver’s wife was never prosecuted.

[Scooter]

Jonathan Ross

That's the name of the pus filled sack of pig shit gestapo stormtrooper who murdered Renee Good.

Do with that info what you will.

We know that thanks to Kristi Noem, who was stupid enough to speak about a previous encounter he was involved in, and all the press had to do was look that up to learn his name.

I guess we can still hope that their stupidity will be their undoing.

[Scooter]

Hennepin County DA is claiming jurisdiction to charge him. Let's see how this plays out.

[liberty]

I tend to agree with Sue on this, But I am unsure if the state could make an argument that the federal officer was not acting within his authority in the shooting and thus subject to state prosecution (as I believe their immunity requires this. I am pretty sure there should be cases on this, but II am not aware of them.

As for the state prosecution in federal courts if the feds refuse to prosecute, I don't know, but I'd love to see it.

Also, I do not know if the extent of the president's pardon power extends to state offenses prosecuted in federal court; I would like to think the president lacks this power, but in this age of imperial presidencies, who knows?

Does the hypocrisy of the left know no limits? Suddenly all the liberals on this site have turned into strong supporters of states’ rights. What happened to the idea that the federal government is supreme and that local governments must meekly submit?

[Scooter]

What happened to the idea that the federal government is supreme and that local governments must meekly submit?

Can anyone point to a quote where someone here expressed this opinion?

Bueller?


Bueller?


Anyone?

[liberty]

This is what your “enemy” thinks on another site, and as far as I can tell, he doesn’t seem to be any kind of racist, homophobe, or fanatic, just a typical blue‑collar guy, I hope I do not have to print a retraction:

"The rush to control the narrative is in full swing. Ice agents came to town and killed an innocent woman just driving her car? Minnesota, one of the most corrupt states in America has ginned up its citizens to commit violence against Ice agents. The woman was just doing what the state told her to do. Driving a vehicle at Ice agents is presented by Minnesota’s leadership as a good thing to do to save democracy. So, the woman acted accordingly in the name of Minnesota. When the woman drove her car at the Ice agents, she believed she was trying to save democracy apparently. Most people do not get in their car and drive it at people who are officially acting in a federal capacity. But in corrupt Minnesota this is encouraged. It is a shame the woman is dead.

The Minnesota Mayor did not wait for all the facts. He acted to control the narrative. He used that woman’s death as a meme to score political points."

[BoSoxGal]

The newly released (by the murderer to right wing media) cell phone video taken by ICE agent Jon Ross from his vantage point proves beyond reasonable doubt that;

A) he had no fear for his life or the lives of others,
B) he acted from anger, misogyny and homophobia probably too,
C) he murdered Renee Nicole Good in cold blood.

[BoSoxGal]

I've only seen this video on Facebook but I'm sure it's other places. Hopefully, this link will work for you.

If I find it elsewhere, I'll add it here.

Edit:

Video from FOX that bleeps out where the officer says "F-in bitch!"

[Scooter]

[Bicycle Bill]

This is what your “enemy” thinks on another site, and as far as I can tell, he doesn’t seem to be any kind of racist, homophobe, or fanatic, just a typical blue‑collar guy, I hope I do not have to print a retraction:

"The rush to control the narrative is in full swing. Ice agents came to town and killed an innocent woman just driving her car? Minnesota, one of the most corrupt states in America has ginned up its citizens to commit violence against Ice agents. The woman was just doing what the state told her to do. Driving a vehicle at Ice agents is presented by Minnesota’s leadership as a good thing to do to save democracy. So, the woman acted accordingly in the name of Minnesota. When the woman drove her car at the Ice agents, she believed she was trying to save democracy apparently. Most people do not get in their car and drive it at people who are officially acting in a federal capacity. But in corrupt Minnesota this is encouraged. It is a shame the woman is dead.

The Minnesota Mayor did not wait for all the facts. He acted to control the narrative. He used that woman’s death as a meme to score political points."

So why don't you tell us just which site this came from?   Or even cite the name of the person you are quoting (that's what quotation marks mean, btw — that you are accurately repeating someone else's words verbatim)?   It's probably some right-wing whack-job like Alex Jones or the late Charlie Kirk, or one of these sites run by some pro-MAGA keyboard jockey that seem to pop up like mushrooms after a summer rainstorm.
Even so, please tell us.   It might be interesting to know just what sort of shit you're shoveling into your mind these days.   

-"BB"-

[Burning Petard]

Mr. liberty, I see no contradictions among the posters in this thread vs what they have posted in the past (including you) Those you identify as hypocritical libs are not writing here of states rights or federal rights. It is a matter of individual human dignity and the expectation that government will follow its own laws, and government agents, of any sort, will follow their published practices and regulations.

States Rights? Have you forgotten the incident in this same state that gave international attention to the national 'Black Lives Matter' demonstrations? That was a local, experienced policeman kneeling on the neck of an American citizen until he was dead, while his fellow officers watched this and considered it 'a training example.' The individual was a suspect who had passed a counterfeit 20 dollar bill. Not a capital offense in any jurisdiction I know of.

I don't understand how you see this thread as a discussion of States Rights.

snailgate.

[BoSoxGal]

[Scooter]