Overdue process?

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Overdue process?

Post by loCAtek »

Re-sentencing? I didn't know the system worked this way;
Sentence Is Sharply Increased for Lawyer Convicted of Aiding Terror
By JOHN ELIGON
Published: July 15, 2010


A federal judge on Thursday increased the sentence of Lynne F. Stewart, a disbarred lawyer convicted of assisting terrorism, to 10 years — nearly five times as long as her original sentence.


An appeals court had ordered the judge, John G. Koeltl of Federal District Court in Manhattan, to resentence Ms. Stewart after it deemed his first sentence, of 28 months, too light.

Judge Koeltl, after speaking for about 45 minutes about the considerations he had made, the legal sentencing guidelines and the facts of the case, ordered Ms. Stewart to serve 120 months.

A collective gasp went up from Ms. Stewart’s supporters, who packed the broad, high-ceilinged courtroom. That was followed by a few shrieks and sobs; some held their hands over their mouths.

Ms. Stewart, in an oversize navy blue prison jumpsuit, sat silently as the sentence was announced. Afterward, when Judge Koeltl offered her an opportunity to speak, she paused for several seconds before rising.

“I’m somewhat stunned, Judge, by the swift change in my outlook,” she said. “We will continue to struggle on to take all available options to do what we need to do to change this.”

She added: “I feel like I let a lot of my good people down,” to which people in the gallery shouted, “We love you.”

The sentence was the latest grim chapter in a long odyssey for Ms. Stewart, who was convicted in 2005 of assisting terrorism by smuggling information from an imprisoned client to violent followers in Egypt.

Ms. Stewart, 70, who has breast cancer and was given time to seek treatment before her first sentencing in 2006, said Thursday that incarceration was wearing her down.

“It’s a death sentence,” her husband, Ralph Poynter, said outside the courtroom.

The case was closely watched in legal circles, as Ms. Stewart presented herself as a martyr for lawyers who, she said, vigorously defended terrorism suspects in the post-9/11 era.

But Andrew S. Dember, an assistant United States attorney, said in court on Thursday that Ms. Stewart’s actions went beyond advocating for her client, Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman.

“She gave aid to pro-violence factions of a violent terrorist organization,” said Mr. Dember, who sought a sentence of 15 to 30 years. The defense had sought to maintain the 28-month sentence.

In ordering Judge Koeltl to sentence Ms. Stewart, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit asked him to weigh, among other things, the prosecution’s contentions that Ms. Stewart committed perjury when she testified at her trial and had abused her position as a lawyer.

Judge Koeltl, who praised the work Ms. Stewart had done throughout her career and said he had received an unprecedented 400 letters supporting her, ruled that she had lied and abused her position.

But what seemed to weigh heavily on the judge’s decision were statements Ms. Stewart made to the press after her first sentencing that she could do 28 months “standing on my head” and that she would do it all again. Those comments, the judge said, indicated “a lack of remorse” and that “the original sentence was not sufficient.”

Before Judge Koeltl ruled, Ms. Stewart tried to backtrack from those statements. She said that prison was worse than she could ever have imagined. “Over the last eight months, prison has diminished me,” she said. “Daily, I confront the prospect of death.”

A version of this article appeared in print on July 16, 2010, on page A22 of the New York edition.
In no way did I ever condone her acts, but re-sentencing after she'd already served 8 months, because of something she said outside of court?
Correct me if I'm interpreting this wrong, but is this justice or just plain spite?

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Lord Jim »

Well, the first thing to bear in mind is that this woman isn't being re-sentenced because of something she said after she was sentenced....

She is being re-sentenced because:
An appeals court had ordered the judge, John G. Koeltl of Federal District Court in Manhattan, to re-sentence Ms. Stewart after it deemed his first sentence, of 28 months, too light.
(Personally, I fully agree with the appellate court decision)

Judges take lack of remorse into account when sentencing all the time. And it's difficult to imagine a more clear cut example of "lack of remorse" than, "I would do it all again."

I think the judge's decision is entirely appropriate; if anything, 10 years is lenient in a case like this. In addition to being an appropriate punishment for the actions she engaged in, it's important to send a message to the legal community that the sort of abuses of position that she engaged in will not be tolerated.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Gob »

The sentence was the latest grim chapter in a long odyssey for Ms. Stewart, who was convicted in 2005 of assisting terrorism by smuggling information from an imprisoned client to violent followers in Egypt.
The woman's an idiot, 28 months was too light, and that'll teach her to shoot her mouth off....
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Jarlaxle »

Should have been LWOP. Actually, should have been a 4' drop with a noose over her head for (I'm calling it what it is) TREASON.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Lord Jim »

Having spent a little time today re-familiarizing myself with the details of this case, I think Jarl has an arguable position...
Last edited by Lord Jim on Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Gob »

Makes a change from wanting her shot in any case!
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Big RR
Posts: 14897
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Big RR »

Well, the first thing to bear in mind is that this woman isn't being re-sentenced because of something she said after she was sentenced....
Officially you are correct, but somehow i imagine that no appeal and/or resentencing would have happened if she just kept her big mouth shut.

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Overdue process?

Post by loCAtek »

Yes, that's my point. I'd only heard of re-sentencing if the convicted had violated the conditions of their sentence. (A felon obtaining a firearm, or an inmate assaulting a guard, etc.) But verbal lack of remorse, which she has recanted while serving her sentence?

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Lord Jim »

if she just kept her big mouth shut.
If she had " just kept her big mouth shut" she wouldn't have been abusing her attorney client privilege relationship to enable the "Blind Sheik" to direct further terrorist attacks...

That four foot rope thing with a noose over her head that Jarl was suggesting was entirely appropriate.

It's difficult to imagine a more text book definition of "treason" than what this woman was engaged in...

And for her lawyer to say that a ten year sentence now that she's 70 years old is a "death sentence"....

Well ain't that a shame...
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14897
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Big RR »

I've heard of it in some cases where orgainized crime heads were sentenced, but I think it is pretty uncommon. Usually the prosecutor doesn't raise it, but in this cas I'll bet her attitude ticked the prosecutor off enough to pursue the appeal.

Big RR
Posts: 14897
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Big RR »

If she had " just kept her big mouth shut" she wouldn't have been abusing her attorney client privilege relationship to enable the "Blind Sheik" to direct further terrorist attacks...
Exactly what further terrorist acts were actually directed via the communications she delivered, Jim? None that I recall from the press coverage of the trial. Clearly she broke the law in transmitting any messages at all, but I have not heard any credible information on actual infromation directing such acts that she supposedly delivered. I don't see any evidence of treason nor was she charged with it.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Lord Jim »

I've heard of it in some cases where orgainized crime heads were sentenced,
That's a very good analogy...

That's precisely what this woman was engaged in...

Like the lawyer for a Mafia Don misusing their lawyer client privilege to enable the Don to convey orders to his capos...

ETA:

With one important difference...

This wasn't about drugs, or prostitution, or loan sharking, or smuggling, or any of the other sorts of petty crimes that the Mafia engages in...

This was about facilitating terrorism, and abusing her position as an "officer of the court" to try to have innocent Americans murdered...

I'm with Jarl on this one....

That four foot rope seems very appropriate...
Last edited by Lord Jim on Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14897
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Big RR »

If I recall Jim, the statments complained about in the trial were statements to public news outlets (particularly Reuters) and not to any individuals. A misuse fot eh privilege to be sure, but nothing like smuggling information to capos.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Lord Jim »

If I recall Jim, the statments complained about in the trial were statements to public news outlets (particularly Reuters) and not to any individuals.
That was only part of it...

She knowingly conspired with a so called "interpreter" who accompanied her to Lawyer-Client meetings so that he could convey the sheik's orders....

I feel about this case, exactly the way I would feel about a cop abusing his presumption of authority and integrity...

It's not just a crime; it's an assault on our justice system...

It's important to punish the person for what they did, (which in this case is odious in the extreme on it's own merits)

But it's also important to send the message that this sort of behavior simply will not be tolerated.
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14897
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Big RR »

Jim--I won't argue that it was a serious crime and a serious breach of security, regardless if I believe that security was warranted or not. However, I do not recall any evidence that there were "orders" for attacks or any violent actions transmitted from the shiek to anyone. I heard a lot of yelling and unsubstantiated accusations to that effect, but no evidence was presented at trial to substantiate any of this, and so far as i recall, she was never found guilty of transmitting, or aiding in the transmitting, of any such information.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Overdue process?

Post by Gob »

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Post Reply