But as we have show in posts that you read, My anecdote which is centered in the US is LIKELY to be true, and Hens anecdote, which is centered in OZ is HIGHLY unlikely based on the fact that 80-90% is far more likely event than <.1% is. Since you do not dispute that, and you read and did not offer dissent when the proof was given, you accept it as true.Grim Reaper wrote:Anecdote =/= proof
Therefore it would appear, that if both anecdotes are true, the US does a better job than OZ. Did I ever indicate I beleived that? No, in fact I said quite the opposite in yet ANOTHER statement you read and knew to be in existence when you posted.
see aboveYou have yet to provide any proof of your assertion that the US is better at dealing with PPD than Australia. What you have done is continue to ignore simple questions with misinformation.
translation: statement is true. we did not then, nor do now require the other participants to back up their claims. such are the priveledges of syncophantism.Oh poor Quad. How about you drop your martyr act. Just more smoke and mirrors to detract from the debate.
no it doesnt. It is what you would like it to, but it was never even a major component of the disucssion, as the previously quoted quotes and the previously posted posts show.Explain how providing more information about birth rates, which is what this discussion revolves around,
No I didnt. I even went to far as to include the average number of seconds betweem a birth, death and immigration to demonstrate that I knew of what I spoke. I even went so far as to include the number per 1000 of births, deaths, and immigration to prove that I knew of what I spoke. you read these posts and knew them to be in existence before you hit enter. Shall we repeat the now familiar phrase.....could be considered a strawman. Especially since you kept throwing in information that included death, immigration, and emigration, which has nothing whatsoever to do with birth rates.
well lookitup then. Here is an opportunity to prove me wrong! shall I spot you a link or two?And? Assuming this is true (since you provide no proof here either)age appropriate for child bearing women who have >1 kid. There are more women with >1 kid than there are with only 1 kid.
non-sequitor strawmen, what is the frequency of these pregnancies? How fast do they get pregnant again?