I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
At least I know the difference between vox and pox as well as site and sight.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
ah, but vox was a joke.... (and is a joke)
....maybe you ll get it later.....
maybe not tho, since john stewart isn t here to explain it anymore, maybe madcow can help you out....
....maybe you ll get it later.....
maybe not tho, since john stewart isn t here to explain it anymore, maybe madcow can help you out....
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
I thought it might be a joke but I decided to be generous.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
I'm going to quote myself here:
I repeat again:

If I sound a bit exasperated...
I am....
On the other hand, if Ronald Reagan had not been qualified to be President by serving two terms as Governor of California, and had instead gone directly from B Movies and hosting Death Valley Days to running for President, in the current insane political environment, he'd probably be at 30% in Iowa...If Ronald Reagan were in this race, he'd be down in the 4% range in Iowa today, based on the fact that he would be qualified...
I repeat again:









If I sound a bit exasperated...
I am....




- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21232
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
Maybe wesw should run?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
well, let us leave it at you being generous.... that is always a good stopping point.
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
nah meade, I m more the chief of staff type. the brains behind the power.....
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
Now, there's a truly terrifying thought...I m more the chief of staff type. the brains behind the power.....




- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21232
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
... or the brains in the throne
(Eng. colloquial)
(Eng. colloquial)
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
So much rapid-fire posting...Missed this one:
That's a bad afternoon for a single speaking engagement for Mr. Bill after his wife became SOS...
Like the, "Marco Rubio got $800,000 for a book advance (Just like Barack You-Know-Who did after he became a US Senator) and paid off his law school loans and spent $80,000 on a boat" thing...
I just don't see that as a big winner for Team Clinton...
I have a hard time believing that a contrast on "personal financial ethics" is really a topic they'd want to highlight in a general election...I really don't see them wanting to go there...
Of course, they're welcome to do so...
I seriously doubt that Madame Clinton and her minions are sitting around thinking, "Boy, we sure hope the GOP nominates John Kasich...that's a slam dunk win
"
LMAOhe walked away from the bankruptcy with a $480k bonus?????)



That's a bad afternoon for a single speaking engagement for Mr. Bill after his wife became SOS...
Like the, "Marco Rubio got $800,000 for a book advance (Just like Barack You-Know-Who did after he became a US Senator) and paid off his law school loans and spent $80,000 on a boat" thing...
I just don't see that as a big winner for Team Clinton...
I have a hard time believing that a contrast on "personal financial ethics" is really a topic they'd want to highlight in a general election...I really don't see them wanting to go there...
Of course, they're welcome to do so...

Yeah, well laugh it up funny girl...Yeah, let's make him the GOP nominee, 'cause he represents change!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

I seriously doubt that Madame Clinton and her minions are sitting around thinking, "Boy, we sure hope the GOP nominates John Kasich...that's a slam dunk win

Last edited by Lord Jim on Tue Sep 01, 2015 1:11 am, edited 2 times in total.



Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
- Sue U
- Posts: 8987
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
No, you're wrong again, and it's a ludicrously false comparison that is frankly grasping at straws. Bill Clinton averaged less than half that amount for his speaking fee during Hillary's last year as Secretary of State, when his fees were highest. Also, he was a popular two-term President internationally renowned and still prominent on the world stage, unlike the still-little-known John "Who?" Kasich. And Clinton wasn't taking money out of a company he had just ridden into the largest bankruptcy in history that brought the international financial industry to a full standstill.Lord Jim wrote:So much rapid-fire posting...Missed this one:
LMAOhe walked away from the bankruptcy with a $480k bonus?????)![]()
![]()
![]()
That's a bad afternoon for a single speaking engagement for Mr. Bill after his wife became SOS...
I'd love to see how well "Wall Street Banker/Sub-Prime Mortgage Profiteer and Fox News Agit-Propagandist John Kasich" plays with the electorate -- many of whom may still be wondering why the people who destroyed the American Dream for millions and crashed the economy through fraud, recklessness and mismanagement STILL HAVE NOT BEEN PROSECUTED. And ask them, do you really think John Kasich is the guy who would bring these weasels to justice?
Who said anything about Clinton? And what do you have against people earning a living? Why do you hate capitalism?Lord Jim wrote:I just don't see that as a big winner for Team Clinton...
I have a hard time believing that a contrast on "personal financial ethics" is really a topic they'd want to highlight in a general election...I really don't see them wanting to go there...
I really didn't believe this year could be any funnier than 2011-12, but believe me, it's been a smash-hit laff riot so far! Oh, and today Trump is murdering ¡Jeb! for loving Messicans so hard. If you're really putting your eggs in that basket, you'd better hope it's not just a basket case by the time you get to New Hampshire.Lord Jim wrote:Yeah, well laugh it up funny girl...![]()



GAH!
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
you sure don t sound like you are laughing on the inside......
- Sue U
- Posts: 8987
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
Listen harder.
Inside and out.
Laughing my head off.
And pointing.

Inside and out.
Laughing my head off.
And pointing.





















































GAH!
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
ah well sue, maybe you can institute some eugenics when you get in power and sterilize everyone who does not meet your standard of humanity
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
Well, like any Republican who's serious about wanting to win the election, (which does not apparently currently include a majority of Republican "likely caucus goers" in Iowa, judging by their candidate preferences...Who said anything about Clinton?

I expect that despite all her reversals, that Hillary will still be the nominee (albeit with a deeply wounded candidacy)...
ETA:
Do you think the Demo nominee will be Sanders? Or some other hardcore leftie?
If you do, all I can say is:



Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
GOP material?


Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
No, he's a hippie commune type...
More a Democrat...
ETA:
Plus he's spent almost his entire life living on uhh, "government assistance"....
More a Democrat...

ETA:
Plus he's spent almost his entire life living on uhh, "government assistance"....



Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
That's exactly right...Scooter wrote:Correction - men who had years, if not decades, of experience in their respective colonial governments before trying their hand at federal politics were the foundation of your democracy. No one fell off their turnip truck and right into the meeting where the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution were signed.wesw wrote:citizen statesmen were the foundation of our democracy.
George Washington, (who had served in the Virginia House of Burgesses prior to being elected to represent Virginia in the Continental Congress) used to show up at Continental Congress meetings in his uniform from his French-Indian War days, in order to remind his fellow delegates of just who was around with real military command experience....
Just on the off chance they might be looking for someone to command the Continental Army...
(Not to take anything away from George; he was a great man, but he was also a politician)
In all of American history, we've had exactly two Presidents who came to office with no prior political office experience....(As I've just pointed out, George doesn't qualify for that)
Ulysses Grant and Dwight Eisenhower...
The two military leaders who commanded US forces during the two most critical military challenges the US has faced since the revolution...
Top positions that required enormous political ability...(Especially in Eisenhower's case...he had to keep both FDR and Churchill happy while keeping both Montgomery and Patton in line...that took some serious political skills...)
Anyone think they see a Grant or an Eisenhower in Trump, Carson, or Fiorina?*
*That was a rhetorical question...



Re: I Believe My GOP Brethren In Iowa...
James Madison, Federalist No. 62:
The citizen legislator was a notion reserved for the states, at best, and many state legislatures have part time sessions to reflect that concept. For example, the General Assembly of Maryland only sits 90 days a year (January-April), then back to the farms and houses of commerce with them. New Mexico has an even shorter session - 30 days in even numbered years, 60 days in odd.It is not possible that an assembly of men called for the most part from pursuits of a private nature, continued in appointment for a short time, and led by no permanent motive to devote the intervals of public occupation to a study of the laws, the affairs, and the comprehensive interests of their country, should, if left wholly to themselves, escape a variety of important errors in the exercise of their legislative trust.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké