Apparently wes is not alone ...
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
well, sue, I appreciate your badly reasoned argument.
I disagree completely, but I appreciate it nonetheless.....
I disagree completely, but I appreciate it nonetheless.....
- Sue U
- Posts: 8931
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
Then perhaps you'd like to explain how "social media sites are public forums, ... [to which] free speech and association must apply." Or what you think "a new anti trust push" is, how it should be applied, who you think would actually undertake such a campaign and why "anti-trust" is somehow even relevant to the issue.wesw wrote:well, sue, I appreciate your badly reasoned argument.
I disagree completely, but I appreciate it nonetheless.....
Or you could just admit you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
ETA:
And by the way, I haven't made any argument that you could even say might be "badly reasoned." I've just pointed out that your claims are, as usual, complete twaddle.
GAH!
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
Oh, you were thinking wes might actually respond to the specific points you made...Sue U wrote:Then perhaps you'd like to explain...wesw wrote:well, sue, I appreciate your badly reasoned argument.
I disagree completely, but I appreciate it nonetheless.....




Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
I responded to BP.
sue over complicates things, as lawyers are wont to do......
I will say that it seems funny for a "socialist" to be supporting big tech....
it is all about control, methinks.
ulterior motives, methinks.....
social engineering.
big bro.
liberty is a dirty word.
the people are not worthy.
her arguments as to the unlimited extent of the internet only reinforce my beliefs that it should be considered a public arena, beholden to our constitutional protections.
jim, on the other hand, has a hard row to hoe......
he has abandoned our constitution, and indeed has criticized it being invoked in argument....
that is why he lost his party.
sad.
the ends justify the means.
jim has become a good little member of a new party.
he has become a pawn, witting or unwitting, in putin s game of destruction, of division, of deceit.
he is intellectually dishonest in order to destroy what he cannot fathom.
destroy trump. destroy the people s power, destroy our republic.
take your thirty rubles and go.
consultants are a dime a dozen these days.
sad.
sue over complicates things, as lawyers are wont to do......
I will say that it seems funny for a "socialist" to be supporting big tech....
it is all about control, methinks.
ulterior motives, methinks.....
social engineering.
big bro.
liberty is a dirty word.
the people are not worthy.
her arguments as to the unlimited extent of the internet only reinforce my beliefs that it should be considered a public arena, beholden to our constitutional protections.
jim, on the other hand, has a hard row to hoe......
he has abandoned our constitution, and indeed has criticized it being invoked in argument....
that is why he lost his party.
sad.
the ends justify the means.
jim has become a good little member of a new party.
he has become a pawn, witting or unwitting, in putin s game of destruction, of division, of deceit.
he is intellectually dishonest in order to destroy what he cannot fathom.
destroy trump. destroy the people s power, destroy our republic.
take your thirty rubles and go.
consultants are a dime a dozen these days.
sad.
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
wesw wrote:
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Surrounded by Trumptards in Rockland, WI – a small rural village in La Crosse County
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
I'll agree with wes on this one.wesw wrote:liberty is a dirty word.
Oh, wait a minute; he means liberty, the concept


Never mind.
Of course. Trump and his supporters are like an infestation of termites, eating away at the support and structural members of this country. And the only way to deal with termites is to exterminate them.wesw wrote:destroy trump
Or in the case of Stormy Daniels, your 130,000 rubles.wesw wrote:take your thirty rubles and go.
But hey! At least she got her money — which is something a lot of people who have had business dealings with The Donald cannot say.
For which Trump should be eternally grateful. He's gone through how many dozen already??wesw wrote:consultants are a dime a dozen these days.

-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
Scooter wrote:Note that wes does not deny being part of the 43%.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
- Sue U
- Posts: 8931
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
You are an idiot, and your every post reinforces that conclusion.wesw wrote:sue over complicates things, as lawyers are wont to do......
I will say that it seems funny for a "socialist" to be supporting big tech....
it is all about control, methinks.
ulterior motives, methinks.....
social engineering.
big bro.
liberty is a dirty word.
the people are not worthy.
her arguments as to the unlimited extent of the internet only reinforce my beliefs that it should be considered a public arena, beholden to our constitutional protections.
GAH!
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
jim, on the other hand, has a hard row to hoe......
he has abandoned our constitution, and indeed has criticized it being invoked in argument....
that is why he lost his party.
sad.
the ends justify the means.
jim has become a good little member of a new party.
he has become a pawn, witting or unwitting, in putin s game of destruction, of division, of deceit.
he is intellectually dishonest in order to destroy what he cannot fathom.
destroy trump. destroy the people s power, destroy our republic.
take your thirty rubles and go.
consultants are a dime a dozen these days.
sad.





















Oh my...
So much madcap hilarity, so little time...
This from a guy who said that shutting down a major cable news network would "strengthen" the First Amendment...he has abandoned our constitution
Wes, there is no evidence from anything you have posted that you have even bothered to read the Constitution, much less that you have even the most basic understanding of what it means...
It would be tempting to say that you know nothing about the Constitution, but your situation is actually worse than that...
You have picked up a whole bunch of misinformation, which when combined with your ignorance of what the document actually says and means, has led you to conclude that you really know something when in fact everything you think you know is wrong...
sad...
Here we have a classic example of wes trying to employ one of his hero's go to tactics...the ends justify the means.
jim has become a good little member of a new party.
he has become a pawn, witting or unwitting, in putin s game of destruction, of division, of deceit.
he is intellectually dishonest in order to destroy what he cannot fathom.
Have the sheer shameless audacity to accuse your opponent, (with absolutely bugger all to back it up) of precisely those things which you yourself are guilty of ... (for which there is a bounty of proof)
(I don't know whether you're a "witting" an "unwitting" pawn wes, so I'll just split the difference and call you a "half witting pawn"...

sadder...
Mindless Trump sycophants are about a dime a gross, so it's a good job you're not trying to market those skills...consultants are a dime a dozen these days.
I fully understand why you are posting the nonsense you're posting, wes. Deep down you know you've been snookered, and trying to defend what on some level you realize is completely indefensible is creating enormous cognitive dissonance for you...
This is generating intense frustration, and you are trying to relieve that by lashing out at those who keep pointing out the facts to you...
saddest...



Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
a fox smells his own hole, jim.......
you ve just transferred your whole dem-nevertrump strategy to me and mine.
you and Pelosi sitting in a tree, doing all the work of the KGB......
your hatred makes you stupid.
....or maybe you just like the perks......, like manafort......, and Hillary.....
you ve just transferred your whole dem-nevertrump strategy to me and mine.
you and Pelosi sitting in a tree, doing all the work of the KGB......
your hatred makes you stupid.
....or maybe you just like the perks......, like manafort......, and Hillary.....
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
Jim ——Thus the constant pointing at squirrels. It’s all he’s got.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
Scooter wrote:Note that wes does not deny being part of the 43%.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
Yep...Guinevere wrote:Jim ——Thus the constant pointing at squirrels. It’s all he’s got.
It's a lot easier than actually trying to defend or justify this serial cluster fuck pseudo-presidency he supports...
Which he (understandably) can't manage to do...



Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
I don t deny fucking dead horses either.....
i don t even know what you mean scooter.
i only started reading this thread at BP s post.
his thoughts interest me
i don t even know what you mean scooter.
i only started reading this thread at BP s post.
his thoughts interest me
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
FTFYwesw wrote:As usual when I have no defensible position, I will stick my fingers in my ears and sing la la la
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
Not even close. Astaire has so much more grace and more substance.
It’s closer to the flailing of Jerry Lewis.
It’s closer to the flailing of Jerry Lewis.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
You're right...
That comparison is very unfair to Fred; he was a superb tap dancer...arguably the greatest ever...
This is much more appropriate:

ETA:
Or:

That comparison is very unfair to Fred; he was a superb tap dancer...arguably the greatest ever...
This is much more appropriate:

ETA:
Or:




Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
That’s exactly it!
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Re: Apparently wes is not alone ...
you guys are hilariously clueless.
ridicule.
another losing strategy brought to you by the creators of the guilt shame and humiliation campaign......
ridicule.
another losing strategy brought to you by the creators of the guilt shame and humiliation campaign......