Slow Joe is a no go?

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Darren
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:57 am

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Darren »

Lord Jim wrote:
Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:43 pm
Darren, I know you and The Mad King's minions are determined to come up with anything you can think of to re-elect the most incompetent, ignorant, corrupt, criminal, and morally and mentally unfit President in American history, but this one really has the stench of desperation wafting from it...

You'll have to do much better than this to assure the re-election of this pathetic buffoon, especially as he presides over the deaths of thousands upon thousands of Americans and economic loss and hardship not seen since The Great Depression...

Go try grasping at some other straw...
I'm not sure how getting Biden evicted and maybe Cuomo or Michelle Obama as a replacements improves Trump's chances.

Meanwhile the closet door creaks open a bit more and LOW AND BEHOLD ...

"In March, when a former aide to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden accused the candidate of sexually assaulting her in 1993, two people came forward to say that the woman, Tara Reade, had told them of the incident shortly after it allegedly occurred — her brother, Collin Moulton, and a friend who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution.

Now two more sources have come forward to corroborate certain details about Reade's claims. One of them — a former neighbor of Reade's — has told Insider for the first time, on the record, that Reade disclosed details about the alleged assault to her in the mid-1990s."

https://www.businessinsider.com/former- ... ser-2020-4
Thank you RBG wherever you are!

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15117
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Joe Guy »

Darren wrote:
Mon Apr 27, 2020 6:25 pm
....Now two more sources have come forward to corroborate certain details about Reade's claims. One of them — a former neighbor of Reade's — has told Insider for the first time, on the record, that Reade disclosed details about the alleged assault to her in the mid-1990s."
Let's see.... about 25 women accused Trump of sexual misconduct along with the audio tape of Trump admitting to how he treats women and you think one accusation from 27 years ago is will destroy Biden's chance of getting elected?

Oh wait a minute! You think he hasn't had enough accusations to get him enough votes?

Makes sense...

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by RayThom »

Darren wrote: I'm not sure how getting Biden evicted and maybe Cuomo or Michelle Obama as a replacements improves Trump's chances.

Meanwhile the closet door creaks open a bit more and LOW AND BEHOLD ...

"In March, when a former aide to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden accused the candidate of sexually assaulting her in 1993, two people came forward to say that the woman, Tara Reade, had told them of the incident shortly after it allegedly occurred — her brother, Collin Moulton, and a friend who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution.

Now two more sources have come forward to corroborate certain details about Reade's claims. One of them — a former neighbor of Reade's — has told Insider for the first time, on the record, that Reade disclosed details about the alleged assault to her in the mid-1990s."

https://www.businessoutsider.com/former- ... ser-2020-4
That's interesting.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9745
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Darren wrote:
Mon Apr 27, 2020 6:25 pm
Meanwhile the closet door creaks open a bit more and LOW AND BEHOLD ...

"In March, when a former aide to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden accused the candidate of sexually assaulting her in 1993, two people came forward to say that the woman, Tara Reade, had told them of the incident shortly after it allegedly occurred — her brother, Collin Moulton, and a friend who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution.

Now two more sources have come forward to corroborate certain details about Reade's claims. One of them — a former neighbor of Reade's — has told Insider for the first time, on the record, that Reade disclosed details about the alleged assault to her in the mid-1990s."

https://www.businessinsider.com/former- ... ser-2020-4
BFD.  Old news, well past the 'use-by' date on the label.

You Trump-turds would be much better off in trying to find a candidate who stands up to scrutiny instead of constantly trying to turn every election into a mud-wallowin', hog-rasslin', shit-slingin' contest in the pigsty to see who can make who come out the dirtiest.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

Darren
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:57 am

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Darren »

Bicycle Bill wrote:
Mon Apr 27, 2020 6:52 pm
Darren wrote:
Mon Apr 27, 2020 6:25 pm
Meanwhile the closet door creaks open a bit more and LOW AND BEHOLD ...

"In March, when a former aide to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden accused the candidate of sexually assaulting her in 1993, two people came forward to say that the woman, Tara Reade, had told them of the incident shortly after it allegedly occurred — her brother, Collin Moulton, and a friend who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution.

Now two more sources have come forward to corroborate certain details about Reade's claims. One of them — a former neighbor of Reade's — has told Insider for the first time, on the record, that Reade disclosed details about the alleged assault to her in the mid-1990s."

https://www.businessinsider.com/former- ... ser-2020-4
BFD.  Old news, well past the 'use-by' date on the label.

You Trump-turds would be much better off in trying to find a candidate who stands up to scrutiny instead of constantly trying to turn every election into a mud-wallowin', hog-rasslin', shit-slingin' contest in the pigsty to see who can make who come out the dirtiest.
Image
-"BB"-
The question is who will be the first to play that card? Pelosi has already signaled the herd that she's behind (she'd never get in front of him) Joe 99.99%.

Will the regressive club of four abandon Bernie and dutifully fall in line?
Thank you RBG wherever you are!

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17126
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Scooter »

"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose

"Colonialism is not 'winning' - it's an unsustainable model. Like your hairline." -- Candace Linklater

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by RayThom »

Darren wrote:
Mon Apr 27, 2020 7:05 pm
... The question is who will be the first to play that card? Pelosi has already signaled the herd that she's behind (she'd never get in front of him) Joe 99.99%.

Will the regressive club of four abandon Bernie and dutifully fall in line?
Yikes! This firmly place me on the horns of a dilemma.

What to do, what to do?
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

Darren
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:57 am

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Darren »

RayThom wrote:
Mon Apr 27, 2020 7:22 pm
Darren wrote:
Mon Apr 27, 2020 7:05 pm
... The question is who will be the first to play that card? Pelosi has already signaled the herd that she's behind (she'd never get in front of him) Joe 99.99%.

Will the regressive club of four abandon Bernie and dutifully fall in line?
Yikes! This firmly place me on the horns of a dilemma.

What to do, what to do?
That depends.

Now that we absolutely know the Bernie supporters aren't behind it, the media should soon be all over it.

Maybe #metoo,

If not, you'd think the GOP could spare some cash for volunteer liars.
Thank you RBG wherever you are!

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by RayThom »

Unbelievable.

How did our Orange Mussolini ever find the time to cheat on three wives -- at least one pregnant at the time -- while running so many of his shady businesses into bankruptcy?

Trump's sexual assault allegations: The full list of women who have accused the President

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 49216.html
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

Darren
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:57 am

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Darren »

The passion was obvious.

"Nearly three-quarters of Democratic voters believe Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont would defeat incumbent President Donald Trump if Sanders were selected to be the party's presidential nominee, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll released Wednesday.

Pollsters asked respondents who were Democrats or leaned Democratic which candidate they thought would win against Trump if that candidate were to represent the party in November. Seventy-two percent said that they thought Sanders would defeat Trump in a one-on-one match-up, while 24 percent thought Trump would win and 4 percent had no opinion."

https://www.newsweek.com/72-democratic- ... EOmk7CSNi4
Thank you RBG wherever you are!

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11551
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Crackpot »

I’m sure 3/4 of Democrats would think an old shoe would beat trump.

I think Bernie could beat trump, but I think the margin is too close to be comfortable with plus I don’t see him as enough of an improvement over Trump as far as representing Americans as a whole and being able to reunite the nation.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

Darren
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:57 am

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Darren »

In the mean time let's do all we can to encourage those Sanders supporters to vote in November.

"“While we understood that we did not have the votes to win the Democratic nomination our campaign was suspended, not ended, because people in every state should have the right to express their preference. What the Board of Elections is ignoring is that the primary process not only leads to a nominee but also the selection of delegates which helps determine the platform and rules of the Democratic Party,” said Bernie 2020 senior advisor Jeff Weaver.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/27/new-yor ... allot.html

Thank you RBG wherever you are!

Darren
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:57 am

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Darren »

Thank you RBG wherever you are!

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by RayThom »

That's a rock and a hard place moment.

It certainly wasn't a confidence builder but, under the circumstances, I'm just going to let it rest.

I don't think Papa Joe will lose any votes due to it, especially when his opponent is a cretin, charlatan, and a known sex abuser.

C'mon November 3rd.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

Darren
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:57 am

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Darren »

Thank you RBG wherever you are!

Darren
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:57 am

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Darren »

The National Archives weighs in on slow Joe's claim.

The National Archives said Friday it has no record of any files from a congressional office that might contain evidence of a sexual misconduct complaint against Vice President Joe Biden from 27 years ago, when he was a senator.

“The short answer is no — we don’t have those. Those records are with the Congress,” John Valceanu, director of communications for the archives, told Yahoo News.

The archives later put out a statement saying in its entirety: “Any records of Senate personnel complaints from 1993 would have remained under the control of the Senate. Accordingly inquiries related to these records should be directed to the Senate.” The office of the secretary of the Senate did not respond to a request for comment."
Thank you RBG wherever you are!

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by RayThom »

I'm sure Moscow Mitch will reveal those documents as soon as he finds them.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

Burning Petard
Posts: 4488
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Near Bear, Delaware

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Burning Petard »

his opponent is a cretin, charlatan, and a known sex abuser.

Yes, and we knew all that in October of 2016. Yet the POS still became the POS-i-c.

snailgate

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19707
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by BoSoxGal »

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Post by Guinevere »

The question I keep asking, that no one has addressed yet, is if there is some alleged contemporaneous record of some allegation against him, why did it never come to light in his vetting for VP?
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

Post Reply