If that were actually how the system worked (it's not), then surely it would have been attempted sometime in the last 237 years.liberty wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 7:42 pmI thought you were a lawyer. As for me, all I have is a couple of civics books that I read alone in my log cabin on the Bayou, by the light of my coal oil lamp. But common sense should tell you, if not the books, that a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime, tried, convicted, and sent to prison. If that were allowed, any prosecutor in this country could bring the government to a standstill by selectively picking a grand jury and indicting the president. I'm sure that's not what the Founders intended. If it were, why would they go to all the trouble of having a president in the first place? For a president to be indicted, he must first be out of office—and even then, he may have some immunity, like a judge does.
Get back to me after you've read (and understood) this, which itself is just the basics:
