Can Anyone Explain How Defecation Laws Make Any Sense?

[Andrew D]

I have not proposed, in any relevant context, that anyone be forced to do anything.

This entire thread exists because Lord Jim is afraid to come to grips with the issues raised in the other thread.

Afraid.

That's what it's all about: Afraid.

Will he ever actually address the issues involved in the substantive thread? Or will he keep on hiding behind a thread he created precisely for the purpose of avoiding those issues?

Will he ever tell us why he thinks that people ought to be forced to clothe themselves? Or will he keep on attempting to equate the act of defecation with the simple fact of nakedness?

Is he still afraid?

Will he remain afraid forever?

[Lord Jim]

The point is that if we start allowing people's preferences (or sensibilities or however one wishes to put it) to dictate what is permissible behavior, we abandon the realm of principle altogether. We end up with rules which exist simply because the number of people in favor of them exceeds the number of people opposed to them.

[Andrew D]

Tyranny of the majority.

Lord Jim.

Perfect fit.

[Lord Jim]

Gee Andrew, I was so moved by the power of your words in the airline baggy pants thread, I thought I'd post them here as well...

I thought you'd be pleased...

After all, they fit perfectly....

Just trying to make sure we stay in the realm of principle when it comes to the right to shit on the sidewalk....

[Andrew D]

Oh, I'm sure that you were moved.

Did you remember to bring the cleaning solution?

Somehow, it is not at all strange that the subject of defecation has been raised by someone bred, born, and raised to lick clean the anus of authority.

[rubato]

Lenny Bruce explains it all for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St0Y8-1BlCc

[Joe Guy]

I'm sure that most prosecutors, if they found themselves in the position of having to decide whether shitting immediately is necessary to avoid the need to find a public restroom, which would cause a delay of justice in a trial, would shit on a sidewalk.

That doesn't mean that I believe that most prosecutors shit on the sidewalk.

It means that many of them do but most of them don't.

[BoSoxGal]

[Lord Jim]

I'm sure that most prosecutors, if they found themselves in the position of having to decide whether shitting immediately is necessary to avoid the need to find a public restroom, which would cause a delay of justice in a trial, would shit on a sidewalk.

That doesn't mean that I believe that most prosecutors shit on the sidewalk.

It means that many of them do but most of them don't.

Well, the reason that most prosecutors don't have to shit on the sidewalk is because most of the time the police have already shit there for them.

[dgs49]

Hey, since feces is the most biodegradable substance on the planet, our legislatures should positively be encouraging us to spread our spoor far and wide.

For the good of the planet.

It would be utterly stupid to capture this beneficial substance, place it in a plastic bag and send it to a landfill, where it can do nobody any good.

[Scooter]

Actually you're wrong, people should be obligated preserve their stools and have them centrally collected so the methane they produce can be burned to generate electricity.

[Andrew D]

Just curious,

What, exactly, did you do to help those poor people in Botswana before you found a gravy train of free medical treatment for you own illness?

Just curious.

Edited by Gob to remove surname.

As Scooter has not posted his surname at this board, I consider it a gross breach of the boards rules to post it here. Not only that I consider it extreme bad manners, uncalled for and below contempt.

I'm leaving the rest of the post, despite it being the most childish bunch of shit I've ever read here.

Anybody got any problems with any of this, I'll be glad to hear them.

[Sean]

Nice bit of editing.

Andrew. Seriously, what the hell were you thinking when you posted that?

[dales]

He wasn't.

Sad, really.

[@meric@nwom@n]

He is likely thinking something like, "Down on your knees and worship me you maggots!" or some type of delusional megalomaniac thing.

He needs to have his liver enzymes checked.

[BoSoxGal]

Nice.

NOT.




Credibility 100% destroyed.

[Lord Jim]

Credibility 100% destroyed.

Andrew fancies himself a perfectionist;

When it was only 98% destroyed he wasn't satisfied.

ETA

Okay, between seeing Sean seemingly applauding a post from Andrew, and reading the other followups, I admit it, my curiosity got the better of me....And I opened Andrew's post...

Apparently Andrew decided to post personal information about Scooter in an obvious attempt to try to intimidate someone who's criticized him...A pure Quad move....

And in the process he managed to win for himself the distinction of being the only poster since this board was created to go so far that he had to have something edited out by the Admin.

As recently as a couple of weeks ago, I would really have been puzzled to see that....

But after his all his troll antics of the past week, I am sorry to say that I'm not surprised in the least. And I'm also sorry to say that I won't be a bit surprised if he does this kind of thing again.

[loCAtek]

Com'on on my worstest days, I've never done that.

[Andrew D]

Oh, please.

Scooter -- whose sacred surname, if it even is his surname, I will not post, because, well, because, um, because ...

Anyway, he told us the name of the hospital the he allegedly does all this work for.

He told us what it is called. He told us where it is. He told us what he allegedly does for it.

I punched what he told us into Google.

Oh, the horror!

I had the gall to activate the world's most commonly used search engine and plug in what he told us.

Where was all this bitching when dgs49 posted my name?

He misspelled it, but then another poster came along and corrected the spelling.

Where was all the self-righteous whining then?

Oh, we all know where it was.

Nowhere.

No fucking where.

[loCAtek]

This is why I don't Facebook, nor post personal info online.