Steele Crazy

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 8905
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Sue U »

Big RR wrote:for any who are idiotic enough to embrace that viewpoint
Don't know if I'm an idot yet, but after five decades of living the terribleness of American politics, I'm leaning more toward an Elvis Costello philosophy of government (i.e., I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused).
GAH!

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Guinevere »

I don't know a single Dem who would love to see Sarah Palin nominated for anything (including dog catcher).

But I do agree with Sue, about the fluidity of politics, and the current level of insanity. To wit -- my beloved Maine:

Election 2010: Maine Governor (June 11, 2010 numbers)

Paul LePage (R)
43% (Mr. Tea Party)

Libby Mitchell (D)
36% (Former majority leader in state House and Senate)

Eliot Cutler (I)
7% (relatively middle of the road, former Dem, and this is a state that likes to elect Independent executives)

Not Sure
14%

The number of LePage signs when I was up there for the fourth were painful to see.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

Big RR
Posts: 14600
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Big RR »

Sue--I think it could well be amusing, if it weren't so damn serious.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Gob »

"Moms kinda just know when something's wrong," she says. "You thought pit bulls were tough? Well, you don't wanna mess with the mama grizzlies!"


The thought that anyone would consider voting for a politician who spoke such stupid, simplistic, and meaningless drivel, fills me with dread for the state of American politics.

Not quite as bad as the fucking moron senator who declared; "No one loves their Mommy as much as I love my Mommy!", but close...
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Andrew D »

Idiocy in American politics is nothing new. "If English was good enough for Jesus Christ, it's good enough for the children of Alabama!"
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Gob »

You are kidding me? Right?

:beam:
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Lord Jim »

except the part about Mitt Romney being more popular than carbuncles
Well, if you think that Sue...

You would be...

Uhh.... what's the word I'm looking for....

Oh yeah....

Wrong.... :D
Thursday, July 15, 2010

Pretty Bad 2012 numbers for Obama

With his approval numbers hitting new lows it's no surprise that Barack Obama's numbers in our monthly look ahead to the 2012 Presidential race are their worst ever this month. He trails Mitt Romney 46-43, Mike Huckabee 47-45, Newt Gingrich 46-45, and is even tied with Sarah Palin at 46. [oh my... :o ] The only person tested he leads is Jan Brewer, who doesn't have particularly high name recognition on the national level at this point.
http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com ... obama.html
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Gob »

Yes, Jim, but that's in the USA, where the people aren't noted for their ...thinking.... prowess



Run away, run away.... :rsp

:stir:
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Lord Jim »

Yes, Jim, but that's in the USA, where the people aren't noted for their ...thinking.... prowess
Quite right Strop....

Well I remember how impressed I was with the Australians by reading in the history books about how they licked polio and split the atom....

And I remember how envious I was as a lad when I watched on television as the Australian Astronauts landed on the moon...

And who can forget the way the Australians, with the industrial might they created with their superior "thinking prowess" were able to rush to the rescue of my nation of little school bus types and prevent us from being conquered by the Japanese....

:fu :rsp
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Gob »

ROTFLMCO!!
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 8905
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Sue U »

Lord Jim wrote:
except the part about Mitt Romney being more popular than carbuncles
Well, if you think that Sue...

You would be...

Uhh.... what's the word I'm looking for....

Oh yeah....

Wrong.... :D
Ooooh, picked your winner already, have you?

"Jim and Mittens sittin' in a tree/K-I-S-S-I-N-G!"

Ain't no Tea Party gonna let that Taxachusetts commie pinko homo-marrryin' healthcare-socializin' Olympics-lurvin' librul be their can-duh-date!

Also, my favorite pic:

Image

:lol: :shock: :lol: :shock: :shock: :lol:
GAH!

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Lord Jim »

Ain't no Tea Party gonna let that Taxachusetts commie pinko homo-marrryin' healthcare-socializin' Olympics-lurvin' librul be their can-duh-date!
"Would you beleive this man has gone as far
As tearin' Wallace stickers off the bumpers of cars
And he voted for George McGovern for president."

"He's a friend of them long-haired, hippie type, pinko fags
I betcha he's even got a Commie flag
Tacked up on the wall, inside of his garage...

He's a snake in the grass, I tell ya guys
He may look dumb, but that's just a disguise
He's a mastermind in the ways of espionage."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMN7fGZW_BY

:D
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Guinevere »

What Sue said, except add "multiple-wife-loving-Mormon" somewhere in the litany.

We stopped him from getting the nomination once, we'll stop him again. <insert evil laugh here>
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11522
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Crackpot »

Coming from the person that defends the Burka.. Mitt Romney has never had multiple wives heck he's never had more than one wife not to mention the Mormon church hasn't supported polygamy for over 100 years.

There's plenty of reasons to dislike both without resorting to childish lies.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

Big RR
Posts: 14600
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Big RR »

Guin--you defended the burka? Please give me a link to that.

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11522
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Crackpot »

next forum down
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

Big RR
Posts: 14600
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Big RR »

If I read that so-called "defense" correctly, it is more of a defense to permit anyone to wear what they want, not a defense of the burka. Indeed, I don't think anyone here has ever defended the wearing of the burka as something desirable.

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Guinevere »

Big RR wrote:Guin--you defended the burka? Please give me a link to that.
I agreed with your comments in the burka thread BigRR. Apparently that's "defending the burka."

Crackpot, chill out, you seemed to miss the humor of this thread. I mean seriously -- why not jump on Sue for calling him a commie, pinko, and homo-marrying.
Last edited by Guinevere on Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 8905
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Sue U »

Oh yeah, Guin, I totally forgot about the whole magic underwear thing. If the 2012 election comes down to a choice between the Kenyan nigruh Muslin and the lefty-poof Latter Day Satanist, my bet is that a lot of the GOP teabagging "base" will be staying away from the polls.
GAH!

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11522
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Steele Crazy

Post by Crackpot »

It is a defense a rational defense. Even things one opposes sometimes merit a defense when they're being attacked in a manner that violates other core principals.
Crackpot, chill out, you seemed to miss the humor of this thread.
Wake up look who started the thread! WHat I am objecting to is exactly what you were objecting to in the burka thread the application of baseless and meaningless vitrol that really adds nothing to the discussion.

Frankly it surprises the hell out of me that you'd go there considering the font of shortcomings Mitt has. I mean Mitt has Flip flopped on so many issues so often I'm surprised someone at MIT hasn't been able to harness him into some sort of perpetual energy generator.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

Post Reply