Charitable fellow that I am, I was prepared to give you the last word on this after this post, even though it included a shot that completely mischaracterized my position:
But not content with that, you decided that even though I hadn't posted again, you needed to swing in with yet another shot completely mischaracterizing my position:MajGenl.Meade wrote:I guess we'll just have to agree that I'm better than an evil terrorist and er... you think that because person (A) has killed X number of people, you are justified in torturing person (B) just in case they know something or other. No confusion about morality there
As Big RR said, your point is understood. We've said our bits and we'll move on.
So having taken advantage of my charitable nature once, I can now assure you that the answer to this:MajGenl.Meade wrote:...to embrace the same depravity as does the "terrorist" we all think is reprehensible. Sue, I know that you too do not think that to murder three people is more moral than to murder seven. Apparently some people confuse the physical quantity of an act with the moral quality of it.
is:And there's a little devil inside of me that wants to see if you stop first




