Apparently wes is not alone ...

[Joe Guy]

Then there's the ruba....er.... scientist dance...

[Scooter]

you guys are hilariously clueless.

My irony meter is irreparably damaged trying to process posts by our resident Trumpanzee.

[Guinevere]

I was looking for that exploded irony meter GIF.

[wesw]

clueless because you don t understand why you lost.

you seem to think it was because we trumpanzees are racist Nazi stupid uneducated woman-hating gay bashers.

wrong on all counts.

then you think that viciousness, comedians, and GIFs and memes are effective methods of persuading people that you are right.

crazy.

I don t think you understand that you are destroying our republic

or maybe you do, either way it is bad

I just think that you are wrong, you are painting people as evil.

your methods of gaining power can lead to massacres and cleansings.

it is sickening to me and I m surprised that it is not sickening to meade.

[Guinevere]

Glad to know your sound reading comprehension continues, wesw.

[MajGenl.Meade]

we trumpanzees are racist Nazi stupid uneducated woman-hating gay bashers

Birds of a feather, wesw.

[Scooter]

(1) A guy who uses the n-word, believes he is entitled to grab women by the pussy, believes that those who march chanting "the Jews will not replace us" are "really fine people", and thinks that "religious beliefs" entitle someone to refuse to hire/serve gay people, is pretty much the textbook definition of a racist Nazi woman-hating gay basher.

(2) Someone could only bring themselves to vote for the guy in (1) if they were also a racist Nazi woman-hating gay basher, or is prepared to excuse the fact that the guy is a racist Nazi woman-hating gay basher.

(3) Only someone who is stupid could deny (1) or (2).

(4) Whether they are also uneducated cannot be known, but whatever education they have did not serve them well.

[Big RR]

I don t think you understand that you are destroying our republic

Somehow I think any president who separates parents and children forcibly, and without any plan for reunification or even tracking of the children, is out to destroy our republic and replace it with something quite different and totalitarian. There can be no other reason to act so brutally. And yet you state that those who oppose him are out to destroy the republic and liberty. I honestly cannot understand that.

[Beer Sponge]

sue over complicates things, as lawyers are wont to do......

I will say that it seems funny for a "socialist" to be supporting big tech....

it is all about control, methinks.

ulterior motives, methinks.....

social engineering.

big bro.

liberty is a dirty word.

the people are not worthy.

her arguments as to the unlimited extent of the internet only reinforce my beliefs that it should be considered a public arena, beholden to our constitutional protections.

You are an idiot, and your every post reinforces that conclusion.

The only response I have for people like wes is to identify them as idiots, and move on. Sue, I agree with you in thinking wes is an idiot. tRump supporters have to be, since anyone with a functioning brain understands exactly what this administration is doing.

[rubato]

"... But this story seems more designed to get clicks than to really schuss out any relevant information. ..."
... " .

schuss on!

yrs,
rubato

[rubato]

If Trump tried to shut down CNN the 9 out of 10 Republicans who voted for him would justify it and you could feed every GOP congress person who condemns it with two happy meals.


yrs,
rubato

[Lord Jim]

you don t understand why you lost.

you seem to think it was because we trumpanzees are racist Nazi stupid uneducated woman-hating gay bashers.

Well, first of all. not all of the people who voted for Trump qualify as genuine Trumpanzees (a lot voted for him even though they found him contemptible; because he'd appoint conservative justices, because he'd support tax cuts and regulatory reform, because they found Hillary Clinton even more contemptible, etc.)

Also, the voting patterns clearly show that many people who voted for Obama twice turned around and voted for Donald Trump, (as I've shown with data I've posted, there were more than enough of these voters to account for Trump's razor thin margin of victory in the key states that gave him the Presidency) and presumably most of those folks were not "racist Nazi stupid uneducated woman-hating gay bashers."

There were a wide variety of reasons people voted for Trump; there is no one-size fits all descriptor for them...

Not the simplistic description you falsely claim everyone here applies (if you bothered to look you would see that I and others here...like Sue for one... posted extensively on all the different kinds of motivations that prompted people to vote for Trump) nor the simplistic romanticized version that you embrace of why people voted for Trump...

All of that having been said, while it's not true that all Trump supporters are "racist Nazi stupid uneducated woman-hating gay bashers" it is undoubtedly true that the vast majority of "racist Nazi stupid uneducated woman-hating gay bashers" are Trump supporters...

And they make up a significant percentage of the hardcore Trumpanzee supporters... (the unquestioning kool aid drinkers...the 17-22 percent of the electorate that consistently say in polls they "strongly support" Trump...the same percentage that also give completely insane answers like saying Trump's behavior makes them feel "proud" or that they believe Trump is "uniting the country"... )

They must make up a significant part of this hardcore bottom-line base, or Trump wouldn't feel the need to pander to them so regularly...

[Lord Jim]

the creators of the guilt shame and humiliation campaign......

I have absolutely no idea what that refers to or is even supposed to mean...

Must be some kind of Trumpanzee code phrase...

[Econoline]

They must make up a significant part of this hardcore bottom-line base, or Trump wouldn't feel the need to pander to them so regularly...

That's an EXCELLENT point, Jim!

[Lord Jim]

Apparently Il Boobce is upset that reporting about him from The New York Times and The Washington Post shows up in search results ahead of "reporting" from Alex Jones and Sean Hannity...

Seems to me that if he's so concerned about journalists reporting "bad" things about him, he should have thought about that before saying and doing so many bad things:

Trump Accuses Google Of Rigging Search Results To Feature ‘Bad’ News About Him

President Donald Trump accused Google of rigging its search engine results to feature overwhelmingly negative coverage of him and “others.”

The “Fake New Media,” according to Trump’s early Tuesday Twitter messages, makes up “96 percent” of the news displayed in Google’s search for “Trump News.” He accused the search engine of not including Republican, Conservative and “Fair” media, a practice he dubbed illegal.

He threatened that the situation “will be addressed.”

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump

Google search results for “Trump News” shows only the viewing/reporting of Fake New Media. In other words, they have it RIGGED, for me & others, so that almost all stories & news is BAD. Fake CNN is prominent. Republican/Conservative & Fair Media is shut out. Illegal? 96% of...
2:24 AM - Aug 28, 2018

....results on “Trump News” are from National Left-Wing Media, very dangerous. Google & others are suppressing voices of Conservatives and hiding information and news that is good. They are controlling what we can & cannot see. This is a very serious situation-will be addressed!
2:34 AM - Aug 28, 2018

Trump regularly rants against media outlets whose coverage he doesn’t agree with, and that at times also includes internet platforms. In October 2016, he tweeted, “Wow, Twitter, Google and Facebook are burying the FBI criminal investigation of Clinton.”

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tr ... 7b002ec5b1

On one level this is kind of amusing...

Donald Trump completely clueless as to why so much negative news about him shows up in search results...("I know, the search algorithms must be rigged!")

But on another level it's not at all funny because once again we our Constitution hating, rule of law trampling, would-be tyrant publicly threatening a private company with reprisals because he doesn't like the independent press coverage he is receiving. (Specifically in this case, that he doesn't like the fact that the citizenry is able to access that coverage without having to sift through a bunch of regime approved propaganda first.)

Richard Nixon on his worst day would never have dared to do such a thing...

[Sue U]

Who gets up in the morning, googles himself and then goes on Twitter to bitch about the results? Who does that? Doesn't he have presidenting to do? Or writing a resignation letter?

[Guinevere]

Who gets up in the morning, googles himself and then goes on Twitter to bitch about the results? Who does that? Doesn't he have presidenting to do? Or writing a resignation letter?

A navel-gazing self-obsessed child who has no concept of what "governance" means.

[Lord Jim]

This would be a big news story in any previous administration but with with the faux president it's like, "Well, there goes Trump trying to destroy the 1st Amendment again, so what else is new"....

[Econoline]

We absolutely have to keep reminding ourselves: THIS. IS. NOT. "NORMAL."

[ex-khobar Andy]

We absolutely have to keep reminding ourselves: THIS. IS. NOT. "NORMAL."