It's not a transcript.

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Lord Jim »

CNN Poll: Support for impeaching Trump rises among independents and Republicans

WASHINGTON (CNN)Americans are about evenly split over impeaching President Donald Trump and removing him from office, as support for that move has risen among independents and Republicans, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS after the announcement of a formal impeachment inquiry by House Democrats last week.
About half, 47%, support impeaching the President and removing him from office, up from 41% who felt that way in a CNN poll in May. The current level matches the high point for impeaching Trump in previous CNN polling -- 47% said they felt that way in September 2018.

The share who favor impeachment and removal from office now narrowly outpaces the share who say they don't feel that way -- a first in CNN polling -- although the two figures are within the poll's margin of sampling error. Opposition stands at 45% in the new poll, down from 54% who said so in May and the lowest point in CNN polling on this topic.

The change since May has largely come among independents and Republicans. About three-quarters of Democrats favor impeaching Trump and removing him from office, roughly the same as in May, while among independents, support for impeachment and removal has risen 11 points to 46% among independents and 8 points to 14% among Republicans.

The shift has also come notably among younger Americans. Sixty percent of those under age 35 now say they support impeaching Trump and removing him from office, up from 43% who felt that way in May, while support for the move among older Americans has held about even (42% now vs. 40% in May). Previous CNN polling on impeachment has not found such a stark gap by age.

And that shift is concentrated on the GOP side. Among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents under age 50, support for impeaching Trump and removing him from office has risen from 9% in May to 22% now, while views among older Republicans and Republican leaners have held about even with just 8% in favor of impeachment and removal from office.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics ... index.html

Senate would have 'no choice' but to hold impeachment trial: McConnell

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on Monday he would have “no choice” but to hold a trial if the House of Representatives decides to impeach President Donald Trump.

The Democratic-led House initiated an impeachment inquiry against Trump, a Republican, on Tuesday after a whistleblower report raised concerns that he tried to leverage nearly $400 million in U.S. aid in exchange for a political favor from Ukraine’s leader.

“I would have no choice but to take it up,” McConnell told CNBC.

If the House approves bringing charges, known as “articles of impeachment,” against a president the process moves to the Senate which holds a trial to determine the president’s guilt.

“Under the Senate rules, we are required to take it up if the House does go down that path. “The Senate impeachment rules are very clear,” McConnell said in an interview.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN1WF1VW
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9103
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Sue U »

“Under the Senate rules, we are required to take it up if the House does go down that path. “The Senate impeachment rules are very clear,” McConnell said in an interview.
In other words:

McConnell (to Trump): See that bus over there?
GAH!

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Lord Jim »

Trump-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General reveals that Trump, his minions and his congressional collaborators are yet again,(yes, you guessed it) completely full of shit:

Intelligence community watchdog debunks whistleblower conspiracy pushed by Trump and other Republicans

Washington (CNN)The intelligence community inspector general is forcefully pushing back against assertions made by President Donald Trump and several Republican lawmakers about the whistleblower complaint that has rocked Washington in recent weeks.

In a rare statement released Monday, the inspector general addressed a false claim pushed by Trump and some of his allies on Capitol Hill, including House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy of California and Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, that the whistleblower lacked firsthand knowledge of the conduct outlined in the complaint and therefore the allegations were based on "hearsay." But the statement from the inspector general made clear that the whistleblower was not simply communicating secondhand knowledge.

"The whistleblower stated on the form that he or she possessed both first-hand and other information," the statement read. "The ICIG reviewed the information provided as well as other information gathered and determined that the complaint was both urgent and that it appeared credible. "

The statement clearly says the whistleblower had "direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct"
and that Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson obtained additional information during his preliminary review that supported other allegations in the complaint not based on firsthand knowledge, including Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. [The "second hand knowledge" bull pucky was always of course a complete red herring, since the conversation summary and other admissions released by Trump's own White House already confirmed a number of the major charges alleged in the whistleblower report]

"As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant's Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided," the statement says.

"Although the Complainant's Letter acknowledged that the Complainant was not a direct witness to the President's July 25, 2019, telephone call with the Ukrainian President, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that other information obtained during the ICIG's preliminary review supported the Complainant's allegations," it adds.

[And the Trumpian propagandists were also proven to be equally full of shit about another false deflection they've been peddling:]

Earlier Monday, Trump tweeted: "WHO CHANGED THE LONG STANDING WHISTLEBLOWER RULES JUST BEFORE SUBMITTAL OF THE FAKE WHISTLEBLOWER REPORT? DRAIN THE SWAMP," referring to a theory that seems to have been initially propagated by the right-wing website The Federalist on Friday.

The article claims that "between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings."

Monday's statement from the intelligence community inspector general clearly debunks that theory, aligning with a fact check conducted by CNN that found the assertion to be false.

The statement said that the form submitted by the whistleblower on August 12, 2019, was the same one the inspector general has had in place since May 24, 2018. The statement reiterated that having firsthand knowledge of the event has never been required in order to submit a whistleblower complaint.

"Although the form requests information about whether the Complainant possesses first-hand knowledge about the matter about which he or she is lodging the complaint, there is no such requirement set forth in the statute," the statement reads.

"In fact," the inspector general's statement continues, "by law the Complainant ... need not possess first-hand information in order to file a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern. The ICIG cannot add conditions to the filing of an urgent concern that do not exist in law."
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics ... index.html

Here's a link to the complete ICIG statement:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics ... index.html

Two thumbs way up for IG Atkinson...

It's highly unusual for a senior intelligence official to issue any kind of statement, let alone one demolishing the line being peddled by the President...

It must be infuriating to Trump that despite his best efforts, he inadvertently appointed somebody with integrity who actually cares about the truth and the rule of law to such an important position...He must be just about as pissed as when he discovered that Jeff Sessions wouldn't risk going to prison on obstruction charges for him...

I suspect that whoever recommended Mr. Atkinson won't be long for the chop...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Lord Jim »

Meanwhile, back at the other end of the public servant integrity gene pool:
Barr personally asked foreign officials to aid inquiry into CIA, FBI activities in 2016

Attorney General William P. Barr has held private meetings overseas with foreign intelligence officials seeking their help in a Justice Department inquiry that President Trump hopes will discredit U.S. intelligence agencies’ examination of possible connections between Russia and members of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, according to people familiar with the matter.

Barr’s personal involvement is likely to stoke further criticism from Democrats pursuing impeachment that he is helping the Trump administration use executive branch powers to augment investigations aimed primarily at the president’s adversaries.

But the high-level Justice Department focus on intelligence operatives’ conduct is likely to cheer Trump and other conservatives for whom “investigate the investigators” has become a rallying cry. Barr has voiced his own concerns, telling lawmakers in April that he believed “spying did occur” when it came to the U.S. investigation of the Trump campaign.

The direct involvement of the nation’s top law enforcement official shows the priority Barr places on the investigation being conducted by John Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, who has been assigned the sensitive task of reviewing U.S. intelligence work surrounding the 2016 election and its aftermath.

The attorney general’s active role also underscores the degree to which a nearly three-year-old election still consumes significant resources and attention inside the federal government. Current and former intelligence and law enforcement officials expressed frustration and alarm Monday that the head of the Justice Department was taking such a direct role in reexamining what they view as conspiracy theories and baseless allegations of misconduct.

Barr has already made overtures to British intelligence officials, and last week the attorney general traveled to Italy, where he and Durham met senior Italian government officials and Barr asked the Italians to assist Durham, according to one person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive issue. It was not Barr’s first trip to Italy to meet intelligence officials, the person said. The Trump administration has made similar requests of Australia, said people who discussed the interactions on the condition of anonymity because they involve an ongoing investigation and sensitive talks between governments.


In a recent phone call, Trump urged Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison to provide assistance to the ongoing Justice Department inquiry, the people said. Trump made the request at Barr’s urging, they said. The Trump phone call was first reported by the New York Times.

Barr’s direct involvement in the effort also helps explain part of the controversial July phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. A rough transcript of that call shows Trump said he wanted Ukrainian assistance to help find out “what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine,” and possible involvement with the Democratic National Committee computer system that U.S. agencies have determined was hacked by Russian intelligence ahead of the 2016 election.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... ar-AAI4Q6S

Aside from Trump himself of course, there is no more disgraceful, (and because of the position he holds, threatening to the rule of law) public official in the United States today than William Barr. Once Trump is gone (one way or another) his actions need to be the subject of a full investigation...

We already know for a fact about one crime Barr has likely committed; lying under oath to a Congressional Committee...

Hopefully the day will come when he and his boss can be cell mates....
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17271
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Scooter »

Image
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Lord Jim »

And the shoes just keep on droppin'...
Inspector General From State Department Requests ‘Urgent’ Meeting With Lawmakers Regarding Ukraine

Inspector General Steve Linick is reportedly making a request to meet with the staff members on Wednesday afternoon, ABC News reported on the matter. Details on the meeting were scarce, but sources who received correspondence from the IG said it had to do with the State Department’s Office of the Legal Adviser and the country of Ukraine.

That nation’s involvement will likely lead many to speculate the matter has to do with something related to the impeachment inquiry within the House of Representatives, although that cannot be confirmed at this time.

The meeting is unusually timed as it coincides at a moment when most of Congress is out of town for recess. Both houses aren’t set to reconvene until October 15.

According to Newsweek columnist Seth Abramson, the meeting will require congressional staff from six House committees to return to Washington.

A congressional aid said the email sent from the IG was “cryptically worded” and of an “urgent” matter, CNN reported. It came almost one hour after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo rejected a timeline that was set by House Democrats for members of the State Department to provide depositions and documents for committees to examine.

Pompeo rejected the plan on Tuesday, calling it an attempt to “intimidate, bully, & treat improperly” members of his department, [This guy works for Donald Trump and he wants to accuse others of attempting to “intimidate, bully, & treat improperly”; that's hilarious... :lol: ] he said in a statement. He added that there wasn’t enough time allotted for individuals to gather the “vast amount of documents” requested for the hearings.

“Let me be clear: I will not tolerate such tactics, and I will use all means at my disposal to prevent and expose any attempts to intimidate the dedicated professionals whom I am proud to lead and serve alongside at the Department of State,” Pompeo said, per reporting from Bloomberg.
https://hillreporter.com/inspector-gene ... aine-47063


Apparently neither the former Special Envoy or former Ambassador to Ukraine (over whom Pompeo no longer has any ability to compell to participate in his efforts to obstruct the congressional impeachment inquiry) feels particularly bullied:
Trump Administration's Former Ukraine Envoy Kurt Volker to Testify Thursday

The Trump administration’s former envoy to Ukraine, Kurt Volker, has confirmed he will speak to three House committees behind closed doors on Thursday.

That’s according to a House official familiar with the meeting who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The official said the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight and Government Reform committees invited Volker to appear as part of their investigations into President Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine.

Volker resigned last week after a whistleblower complaint detailed Trump’s interactions with the Ukrainian president.

The official said former Ambassador to Ukraine Marie “Masha” Yovanovitch will appear Oct. 11. The committees agreed to the new date after she was originally scheduled to appear Wednesday.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told the panels in a letter Tuesday that the dates they had scheduled were “not feasible.”
https://time.com/5690606/ukraine-envoy-volker-testify/


Meanwhile, back in The Enchanted Kingdom:
Image
“I am coming to the conclusion that what is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP, intended to take away the Power of the People, their VOTE, their Freedoms, their Second Amendment, Religion, Military, Border Wall, and their God-given rights as a Citizen of The United States of America!”
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9798
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Bicycle Bill »

“I am coming to the conclusion that what is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP, intended to take away the Power of the People, their VOTE, their Freedoms, their Second Amendment, Religion, Military, Border Wall, and their God-given rights as a Citizen of The United States of America!”
I don't give a damn if it's a good old-fashioned tar-and-feathering followed by Trump's being ridden out of town on a rail as long as we get his sorry ass out of the White House.

How can this be a 'coup' when the process is spelled out as the Constitutionally-enshrined way of removing a criminal from the highest office in the land?  If this is indeed a coup, it is a coup de guerre against a corrupt and unfit regime because finally the people have had enough and are rising up to take back the power they have gradually — and in many cases, willingly — allowed Trump and Co to usurp.

In a way, I agree with Maxine Waters — impeachment is not good enough.  Trump will be removed from office, and he will scurry off to his rathole with his ill-gotten gains (and for better or worse, his place in the history books) while the rest of the country tries to clean up the mess he has made of the place over the past three years.  It's too bad that we can't somehow revoke his citizenship and turn him into a modern-day Philip Nolan; a man without a country.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Big RR »

If he's worried about the power of the people, he could be removed by the "coup" and the people could vote him right back into office, Of course, even his supporters (or at least a majority of them) really can't be that stupid.

And sure, I do know tha he could be prosecuted, but like Ford I have no doubt Pence will pardon him right after he becomes president.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Lord Jim »

Pence could pardon him for federal crimes, but he would still likely face prosecution for state crimes in New York...
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Big RR »

We can only hope; if he were removed from office (something I think is pretty unlikely at this point), I'd bet all those prosecutions would stop "for the good of the country" (Pure BS) or "to help us heal". Usually, Americans only want to keep twisting the knife on minorities, they feel sorry for rich, white men accused of crimes. I'd love to see him behind bars (or even tried in open court), but I doubt that will ever happen; hell, he can't even be disbarred as Nixon and Clinton were.

The only thing I am reasonably hoping for is that he will be impeached after public hearings, and that this will kill any reelection plans (even if he is not removed from office).

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

It's not a transcript.

Post by RayThom »

Predictably, the Grifter-in-Chief has been proven to be morally and legally bankrupt. Once again, he finds himself up against the wall and his MO is to cut his losses and walk away from any deal he has touched. Scorched earth.

I have a feeling that Lord Dampnut will seriously consider resignation IF all his indictable offenses are dropped once he skulks away from his cabal of misdeeds and malfeasance. Just like our other crooked president, Nixon.

We'll be able to handle the crippling effects of Pence's limited time as POTUS as they unravels.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5811
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

Big RR wrote: Of course, even his supporters (or at least a majority of them) really can't be that stupid.
You really are a 'glass half full' kind of guy, aren't you?

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20061
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by BoSoxGal »

Big RR wrote: Of course, even his supporters (or at least a majority of them) really can't be that stupid.
You’re right, of course - they’re not that stupid.



They’re evil hearted monsters who delight in his criminality and cruelty.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9103
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Sue U »

Big RR wrote: And sure, I do know tha he could be prosecuted, but like Ford I have no doubt Pence will pardon him right after he becomes president.
It would be nice to see him tried for tax fraud and honest services fraud, and be ordered to make restitution, pay fines and serve prison time. But if we can't even try Dick Cheney, John Yoo, Jay Bybee and David Addington for war crimes/crimes against humanity for actually approving torture, I hold little hope for justice being served here, either. (And yes, I'm making it my personal mission to see to it that the world does not forget about these assholes and their unspeakable crimes.) (And also yes, Donald Trump, Stephen Miller and everyone else responsible for creating and implementing the inhuman detention policy at the southern border should also be tried for crimes against humanity.)
GAH!

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Lord Jim »

Just caught some of The Mad King's latest crazy spewings at a joint press conference with the President of Finland ...

On and on he went about how the transcript that he released completely demolished the claim that he was trying to use US military aid as a lever to pressure a foreign government into finding dirt on a political opponent, when anyone with the reading skills of a third grader can see for themselves that it does exactly the opposite...

Then he repeated a host of other debunked lies and tossed out a few new ones that will be just as easy to debunk (like accusing Adam Schiff of helping to write the whistleblower report... :loon )

He really is retreating further and further in to a fantastical alternative reality...

The good news is that more and more people seem to be wising up to this shameless schtick:
New polls show impeachment support approaching the danger zone for Trump

President Trump reportedly told his advisers last week that he would start worrying if national polls showed more than 50 percent of Americans supporting his impeachment. Five surveys released in the past two days show that public support for Trump’s impeachment is approaching a majority — and rising.

The polls were taken after the release of a memo summarizing a phone call in which Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, the basis for the impeachment inquiry launched last week by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, but before a flurry of developments late Monday afternoon gave added impetus to the investigation. Those included a report that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was among those who listened in on Trump’s July 25 call and the news that Trump also pressured Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison for information that could help discredit former special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

The surveys were framed slightly differently — some asking about support for the inquiry, others about impeachment outright — and the results varied, but in all cases the trends were unfavorable to the president.

• A CBS News poll found that 55 percent of Americans support the impeachment inquiry, while 45 percent disapprove. Among Democrats, 87 percent support the inquiry versus 13 percent who do not. Among Republicans, 23 percent support the impeachment inquiry, while 77 percent do not. In terms of Trump’s impeachment, 42 percent of those polled believe he deserves to be impeached, while 36 percent believe he does not. About a quarter (22 percent) feel it’s too soon to say.

• A Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 45 percent of American adults believe Trump should be impeached, up from 37 percent who did a week ago. The survey found that 41 percent believe he should not be impeached; 15 percent said they “don’t know.” Among Democrats, 74 percent said Trump should be impeached — up 8 points over the past week — while 13 percent of Republicans said they supported impeachment, up 3 points.

• A CNN poll found that 47 percent believe Trump “should be impeached and removed from office,” up from 41 percent in May. The survey found that 45 percent disagree, down from 54 percent in the May poll. Part of the shift can be attributed to younger Republicans. Among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents under age 50, support for impeaching Trump and removing him from office has risen from 9 percent in May to 22 percent now, CNN’s poll found, while views among older Republicans and Republican leaners have held about even.

• A Quinnipiac poll showed a split (47 percent to 47 percent) among voters who support impeaching and removing President Trump from office and those who do not. But it represented a 10-point jump in support for his impeachment and removal compared with last week, when the same survey found just 37 percent supported it, compared with 57 percent who did not. The poll also asked respondents whether they thought Trump believes he is above the law. A majority (56 percent) said yes; 42 percent said no.

• A Monmouth University poll found support for Trump’s impeachment (44 percent) up 9 points since August, when just 35 percent supported it. Monmouth’s survey was the only one that found a majority (52 percent) not supporting the president’s impeachment.
https://news.yahoo.com/polls-trump-impe ... _test=1_04

Finally, at long last it just may be the case that this pony's one trick won't hornswoggle enough people to save him....
ImageImageImage

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

It's not a transcript.

Post by RayThom »

Can RICO laws somehow apply to the White House faction of the Trump Organization?

Even if possible I suspect this prosecution would have to wait until "the Don" is out of office.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9103
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Sue U »

RayThom wrote:Can RICO laws somehow apply to the White House faction of the Trump Organization?
It's never RICO.
GAH!

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20061
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by BoSoxGal »

Keep running your crazy ass pie hole Donnie Boy; threaten more violence in the streets and executions of patriots. Tweet tweet tweet your toxic spew!! Watch those polls rise and rise.

I smell a hint of sanity on the wind of our future. Fucking long time coming.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

It's not a transcript.

Post by RayThom »

Sue U wrote:... It's never RICO
"It (RICO) conveys, to people who don't understand it, "the things these people did are really bad and really criminal."

OK... I guess I understand it a little better. As a simple layman I thought it might be a good way to go, but obviously not.

Anyway, I don't feel so stupid now that I see a URL dedicated to an explanation as to why it's not feasible.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11661
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: It's not a transcript.

Post by Crackpot »

There were two urls in Sues post.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

Post Reply