She's Back

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17271
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: She's Back

Post by Scooter »

Image

On whether or not this was a racial slur, you stand with eiher the Navajo Nation or with Sarah Huckabee Sanders. Your choice.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17271
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: She's Back

Post by Scooter »

Image
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9796
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: She's Back

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Scooter wrote:On whether or not this was a racial slur, you stand with eiher the Navajo Nation or with Sarah Huckabee Sanders. Your choice.
I stand with the Diné.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: She's Back

Post by Lord Jim »

disparaging someone for having the courage to assert their identity in the face of persecution
Wow, I had no idea that The Harvard Law School was such a hot-bed of anti-American Indian bigotry...

Warren's decision to bravely assert her 1/32nd American Indianess in such a prejudice-riven place makes her a regular Profile In Courage...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20058
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: She's Back

Post by BoSoxGal »

Don’t be an ass.

It’s perfectly understandable why Warren would come to publicly embrace her Cherokee and Delaware heritage later in life, at a time when attitudes had changed such that it was no longer widely considered to be shameful and something for families to keep secret, as was the case for many, many ‘white’ families in Oklahoma who actually have Native American blood. It might have correlated with a time when she was reaching the pinnacle of her professional achievement in academia, which would also be a time of personal empowerment - so what? Harvard has been clear that her 1/32 Native American heritage had nothing to do with her getting the position and this whole big deal over it created by Scott Brown and Donald Trump is purely racist and sexist and nothing else. Jokes on them because they’re both going down in history as losers, while Warren has already established herself as a champion of regular people and has much more time ahead of her.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15397
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: She's Back

Post by Joe Guy »

Image

Did I mention that I'm 1/32nd sexually harassed?

MGMcAnick
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:01 pm
Location: 12 NM from ICT @ 010º

Re: She's Back

Post by MGMcAnick »

Comedian George Lopez says any race with PANIC in its name is OK by him.
A friend of Doc's, one of only two B-29 bombers still flying.

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: She's Back

Post by rubato »

The same people who mock and condemn Warren for publicly embracing her heritage would mock her for "hiding" it if she didn't. That's how racists roll.


yrs,
rubato

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5808
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: She's Back

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

:ok

Very true, Rube.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15397
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: She's Back

Post by Joe Guy »

rubato wrote:The same people who mock and condemn Warren for publicly embracing her heritage would mock her for "hiding" it if she didn't.
How would we know if Warren was hiding 1/32nd of her heritage?

liberty
Posts: 4954
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Colonial Possession

Re: She's Back

Post by liberty »

I have a quarter Amerindian ancestry, my daughter has an eight and my granddaughter has a sixteen; none of us claim to be Indians, not that we are ashamed of it. I am no more proud or ashamed of them than I am of my southern or Eurasian ancestors. They were all merely people trying to do the best they could. At one time, they all kept slaves, they all enjoyed torturing their enemies for entertainment and they all were pagan savages, but they evolved. There is nothing special about my Indian ancestry so why would I place it on a form unless I was looking for a freebie.

Clarification: To the best of my knowledge and research none of my Confederate ancestors owned slaves.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17271
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: She's Back

Post by Scooter »

liberty wrote:I have a quarter Amerindian ancestry, my daughter has an eight and my granddaughter has a sixteen; none of us claim to be Indians, not that we are ashamed of it.
And yet you never miss an opportunity to claim that your "people" came from the steppes, even though your genetic testing shows no link to Central Asia. Yet you insist it is true only because, in what passes for your mind, that would make your ancestors a "purer" form of Caucasian.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: She's Back

Post by Guinevere »

Joe Guy wrote:
Image

Did I mention that I'm 1/32nd sexually harassed?
What makes you think that’s funny?
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21469
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: She's Back

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Genealogist Chris Child of the New England Historic Society looked into Warren’s background and found a document stating that she has a great-great-great-grandmother who is Native American, which would make her 1/32 Cherokee, NPR reported.

But Child told NPR that it would take more research to confirm that finding. Later, the New England Historic Genealogical Society has backtracked on Child’s finding, according to the Atlantic, saying there is "no proof that Elizabeth Warren's great-great-great-grandmother O.C. Sarah Smith either is or is not of Cherokee descent.”
http://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world ... 29953.html

Whatever, he is still a racist boor.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9102
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: She's Back

Post by Sue U »

MajGenl.Meade wrote: Whatever, he is still a racist boor.
Well, that's certainly something everyone can agree on.
GAH!

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: She's Back

Post by Guinevere »

I prefer racist piece of garbage but I can live with boor.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20058
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: She's Back

Post by BoSoxGal »

There was a really good piece on the Warren genealogy issue back in 2014 or whatever, discussing the prevalence of family lore of Native American blood that thousands of Oklahomans have grown up with, in a state that has the third largest Native American presence having been the exile to which so many eastern Native American people were consigned to by Trail of Tears, etc. The piece also discussed the difficulty of obtaining records of ancestors, especially Native American ancestors, because so many families wanted to hide that heritage in a time when it was not something of which one was ‘allowed’ to be proud by a virulently racist society.

Some people who are documented 1/32 Native American are proud about that and want to wear that heritage proudly; others like liberty don’t. Neither is wrong or right, it’s simply a matter of preference. All this shaming is pathetic; if I’m a tiny bit Irish, does it make me a hypocrite that I embrace that and celebrate it, just because I’m much more English and German? Perhaps I identify more with the part of me that is underdog - I sense that Eizabeth Warren is the same.

On a related note, as I’ve said here a few times, I was raised with family lore that I am a wee bit Pequot/Wampanoag on my mother’s side. My niece - my half sister’s daughter, who shares my paternal heritage only - bought me a MyHeritage DNA kit for my birthday last month; it sits unopened on my kitchen counter, as I find I’m somewhat reluctant to put to rest all the questions about family lore regarding not only my potential Native American heritage, but the actual origins of my father's people. He has crowed endlessly about his proud German heritage (100%!) for as long as anyone would listen; along the way I came to realize that our family name is actually French Huguenot and while common in Germany, is derived from Huguenots who fled to Germany from France ~500 years ago to escape religious persecution. When I shared this information with my father, a bigot who hates the ‘surrender monkey’ French, we nearly came to blows and it caused a greater than ever rift between us - some people can’t stand facts. But the plot further thickens; my niece's DNA heritage results included no contribution whatsoever from Western European gene pools; she’s definitely my sister’s kid, and I’m pretty sure my sister is my dad’s kid, though she resembles her mother a great deal more than any resemblance to our father and at the time they were together (her mother, my father), they were both making the rounds. Anyway, it’s possible my father isn’t German at all, which would be just about the funniest thing ever.

I really should swab my cheek and send it in.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Burning Petard
Posts: 4596
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Near Bear, Delaware

Re: She's Back

Post by Burning Petard »

Those groups that claim to identify your ancestry by DNA--is there any validation on just what their resources are for these claims?

I suspect their 'scientific' results have about as much hard science support as a phrenology examination.

snailgate

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20058
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: She's Back

Post by BoSoxGal »

Actually the ethnic heritage DNA tracking has been ongoing worldwide for over a decade now, beginning as a project of National Geographic, and is becoming more and more specific with every passing day as more and more samples are added to the data. There are lots of articles available online about the science of this if you’re interested - it is absolutely not pseudoscience akin to phrenology.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Post Reply