Page 1 of 2

And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 1:43 pm
by Lord Jim
Which makes the labyrinth of possible outcomes in the British election look simple and straight forward by comparison:
Benjamin Netanyahu behind in final polls before Israel's election

Image

Final opinion polls put Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party four seats behind its centre-left rivals, days before the general election.

The top-selling Yediot Aharonot showed Likud’s main challenger, the Zionist Union coalition, winning 26 of the 120 seats in parliament against 22 for the Israeli prime minister's party.

Its survey, published on Friday, of 1,032 respondents by pollster Mina Tzemach put The Joint List, a newly formed alliance of Israel’s main Arab parties, in third, with 13 seats.

The poll had a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points, the paper said.

A Panels Research poll published jointly by The Jerusalem Post and Maariv dailies showed the same four-seat gap between parties, with the Zionist Union winning 25 against 21 for Likud.

The survey of 1,300 people also saw The Joint List winning 13 places. It had a margin of error of 3.0 per cent.

Friday is the final day that opinion polls may legally be published before the vote.

The Zionist Union fuses the Labour party of Isaac Hertzog with the centrist HaTnuah led by Tzipi Livni, formerly Israel’s chief peace negotiator with the Palestinians.

Recent polls had put it two to three places ahead of Likud. A Thursday survey by the left-leaning Haaretz newspaper gave the Zionist Union 24 seats to Likud’s 21.

The Joint List was third with 13 seats.

Israel’s electoral system means that the government is not formed by the largest party, but by whichever party leader can build a coalition commanding a parliamentary majority.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... ction.html

I for one would be delighted to see the back of Benjamin Netanyahu. I am a staunch supporter of Israel, but I do not believe that Israel's strategic interests have been at all well served by this implacable foe of any meaningful dialog with the Palestinians. His policy of unending settlement expansion has made it absolutely impossible for any Palestinian leader to negociate with him, and he likes it that way. A new approach is definitely needed.

That having been said, if one looks at that chart, the Zionist Union coalition leading Likud by four seats is pretty much meaningless. (It also seems kind silly to talk about "major parties" when one has 26 and the other has 22 but 61 are needed to form the government...Israel is the world's greatest argument against a genuine multi-party system; parties that represent the tiniest sliver of popular support wind up with vastly outsized influence as the larger blocs try to win them over to cobble together a majority. There's nothing particularly "democratic" about giving parties with tiny popular support more influence than their numbers justify.)

If you look at that chart, and you take the 26 Zionist Union seats, and you add in the 17 "others" on the left side, (which I assume represents a hodgepodge of liberal or leftist teeny weenie parties and independents) and if on top of that you throw in the 13 seats for the Arab parties, you still only come up with 56 seats, which is five short of the majority needed...

On the other hand, if you add the 22 Likud seats to the 29 "others" on the right side of the chart, (which I assume represents a hodgepodge of conservative or rightist teeny weenie parties and independents) you're already up to 51, meaning that all Netanyahu has to do is peel off 10 of the 13 seats from the teenie weenie religious parties to form a majority. Which will of course involve giving these teenie weenie religious parties way more influence over policy then they would deserve based on their electoral support.

And even if the Zionist Union bloc were to form the government, they couldn't do it without at least five seats from the religious party group, which would once again involve giving them way more influence than they deserve.

But it's highly questionable that this could even be possible, because if you do the math, the only way the Zionist Unionists can form a government, (even if they win more seats than Likud) is if they some how manage to get both the Arab parties and at least some of the Religious parties into their coalition. That seems extremely problematic, but Israeli politics has produced strange bed fellows before...

Another theoretical possibility would be a National Unity government consisting of both the Zionist Unionists and Likud, (there's some precedent for this; Labor led by Shimon Peres and Likud led by Yitzak Shamir tried this in the late 80s) but even if you add their totals together you only get to 49 meaning that some combination of at least 12 of the teenie weenies or independents would still be needed to form a government. (Granting them of course, out-sized influence over policy)

But even this is a very remote possibility because "national unity" ain't the way Bibi rolls...

The only advantage Zionist Union would get from finishing ahead of Likud in the seat count is that it might mean that the Israeli President (who is himself a member of the Labor party) would give them first crack at forming a government. But as you can see, if the numbers wind up being what the latest polling indicates, their chances of achieving this are pretty slim....

If this polling accurately reflects the final outcome, (and perhaps it won't; maybe what we're seeing in these numbers is the beginning of voter trend away from Likud, and by the time the vote is held in several days, they will actually perform worse than indicated by these numbers) the most likely result is that in a couple of weeks there will be a new Israeli government that looks almost identical to the old Israeli government...

A Likud led right-wing hardliner coalition, with Netanyahu as PM and a hand full of religious party types bought off by giving them more power than they deserve based on their support.

Which seems like a pretty depressing prospect to me, but it is what it is...

We have a relatively minor political problem in this country currently with the Tea Party types exercising out-sized political influence within the Republican Party in Congress....

What the Israelis have with their system is the Tea Party problem on steroids; with extremists of all varieties that have only tiny popular, support having to be courted and mollified just to even get a government formed... I don't feel particularly envious of that...

Thanks, but no thanks...

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 2:08 pm
by Long Run
Thanks for the explanation of their crazy system. Forming a majority is definitely more complicated than promising some milk and honey!

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 2:37 pm
by Lord Jim
The threshold for being guaranteed a seat in the Israeli parliament (which they call the Knesset) is 3.25%...

This is the lowest in the world, but believe it or not, it's actually an improvement:
The threshold is 3.25% in Israel's Knesset (it was 1% before 1992, 1.5% in 1992–2003 and 2% until March 2014)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_threshold

There's really only one word to describe a party that gets 3.25% of the vote...

That word is "losers"....

Okay, maybe two words; "BIG losers"...

A party with 3.25% of the vote has been overwhelmingly rejected by the electorate; they are entitled to exactly nothing. When you start giving power to parties that have been that decisively repudiated, you are undermining the whole concept of representative democracy.

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:44 pm
by rubato
The distortion is in fact in the other direction. If there are 120 seats in the Knesset then for accurate proportional representation each member would represent 0.83% of the whole so in fact this effectively disenfranchises people who do not have a large excess of votes, almost 400% of the number for 'one man one vote' democracy to be realized.

But Republicans do love Jerrymandering ... so ... much.


yrs,
rubato

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:45 pm
by rubato
Did John Boner get a kickback for the boost? Or will he get paid off later on?


yrs,
rubato

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:54 pm
by Lord Jim
The distortion is in fact in the other direction. If there are 120 seats in the Knesset then for accurate proportional representation each member would represent 0.83% of the whole so in fact this effectively disenfranchises people who do not have a large excess of votes, almost 400% of the number for 'one man one vote' democracy to be realized.
I'm in a charitable mood, so I'm going to assume that was an attempt at humor...

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 7:57 pm
by rubato
Lord Jim wrote:
The distortion is in fact in the other direction. If there are 120 seats in the Knesset then for accurate proportional representation each member would represent 0.83% of the whole so in fact this effectively disenfranchises people who do not have a large excess of votes, almost 400% of the number for 'one man one vote' democracy to be realized.
I'm in a charitable mood, so I'm going to assume that was an attempt at humor...
You are as innumerate as always. Proportionate representation means what it says, until liars like you take over.


yrs,
rubato

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 8:14 pm
by Lord Jim
LMAO :lol: :lol: :lol:

Okay, so it wasn't humor... (Well, intentional any way. As intended humor it wasn't particularly funny; as unintentional humor it's hilarious) Just yet another example of your staggering ignorance about the most basic things; this time about what the concept of "one man one vote " means...

And yet another damning indictment of the California public education system...

ETA:

Here's a hint Professor Corey:

"One man one vote" has absolutely nothing to do with some silly and meaningless computation that takes the number 100 (representing 100%) and divides it by number of seats in the body. That formulation has absolutely no relevance to anything...Except as a pure academic exercise , I can't even imagine what one could possibly use it for, or apply it to...

(I can't believe I'm having to explain this to a supposedly college educated adult... :roll:)

You tried to make yourself look clever by cooking up that meaningless and moronic formula, but all you did was demonstrate that you have absolutely no idea what "one man one vote" means....

And like I said, that's hilarious... :lol:

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 9:17 pm
by rubato
Lord Jim wrote:LMAO :lol: :lol: :lol:

Okay, so it wasn't humor... (Well, intentional any way. as intended humor it wasn't particularly funny; as unintentional humor it's hilarious) Just yet another example of your staggering ignorance about the most basic things; this time about what the concept of "one man one vote " means...

And yet another damning indictment of the California public education system...

ETA:

Here's a hint Professor Corey:

"One man one vote" has absolutely nothing to do with some silly and meaningless computation that takes the number 100 (representing 100%) and divides it by number of seats in the body. That formulation has absolutely no relevance to anything...Except as a pure academic exercise , I can't even imagine what one could possibly use it for, or apply it to...

(I can't believe I'm having to explain this to a supposedly college educated adult... :roll:)

You tried to make yourself look clever by cooking up that meaningless and moronic formula, but all you did was demonstrate that you have absolutely no idea what "one man one vote" means....

And like I said, that's hilarious... :lol:
Your 'logic' makes sense only to someone who hates people and hates real democracy.

But what else are you about?

yrs,
rubato

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 10:07 pm
by Lord Jim
Rube, why don't you do yourself a favor and look up "one man one vote"...(since you apparently insist on continuing to broadcast the fact that you have absolutely no idea what it means)

Maybe that way you can stop embarrassing yourself...

At least about this....

ETA:

I just checked out some of your other "responses" in some other threads...

I guess the "stop embarrassing yourself" ship has sailed...

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:45 pm
by Sue U
Lord Jim wrote:We have a relatively minor political problem in this country currently with the Tea Party types exercising out-sized political influence within the Republican Party in Congress....

What the Israelis have with their system is the Tea Party problem on steroids; with extremists of all varieties that have only tiny popular, support having to be courted and mollified just to even get a government formed... I don't feel particularly envious of that...
Except that the leadership of the "minor" Israeli parties don't all believe that they should be PM or otherwise running the entire government. That's the difference between a genuine multi-party democracy and the two-party winner-take-all duopoly that we have here in the U.S. Smaller parties can be given specific ministerial portfolios and otherwise brought into the policy-making process of government without ministries; their roles can be in fact quite circumscribed and do not have to represent "out-sized political influence." Often, the smaller parties represent only a single issue or small set of social policies that do not necessarily conflict with either the larger right- or left-wing agendae, or which at least can be accommodated sufficiently to keep a government standing as long as there is a governmental commitment to a particular policy or proposal. And coalition governments in Israel are rarely strictly left- or right-wing in any event; Labor and Likud have shared power previously.

The Israeli parliamentary system is not "crazy"; it is far more dynamic and guarantees far more accurate reflection of the population as a whole than the stifling Tweedle-Dum and Tweedle-Dumber arrangement familiar to (and increasingly held in contempt by) Americans.

However the Israeli election turns out, the only thing certain is that there will be a lot of wrangling and deal-making over the weeks to come.

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:07 pm
by Econoline
That would be the other disadvantage of a multi-mini-party parliamentary system (besides Jim's observation that "parties that represent the tiniest sliver of popular support wind up with vastly outsized influence as the larger blocs try to win them over to cobble together a majority"). In so many nations which use some sort of party-based parliamentary system, there are often long periods when there is effectively NO government running things.

Even in the (IMO) worst recent crisis in our system, in the 2000 Presidential election, despite the months of vote-counting and legal shenanigans there was a legitimate, functioning (Clinton) executive branch right up until the day that the next POTUS was inaugurated.

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:53 pm
by Sue U
The day before the election, he admits to being a fraud and a liar all along. Fuck you, Bibi.

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:12 pm
by Lord Jim
I saw this in the news yesterday, and was going to post about it...

It's been obvious for a long time that Benjamin Netanyahu had no serious interest in pursuing a two state solution, but I was somewhat surprised to see him admit it publicly and state it as his policy...

Netanyahu is a cynical SOB who will do or say anything to try to hold on to power...

This last minute attempt to pull in right-wing votes by jettisoning a commitment that has been the policy of successive Israeli governments without regard to party for nearly 20 years is so transparent, I wonder if even the people it is designed to appeal to will trust him on it...

I think there's a good chance this may backfire on him; energizing his opponent's voters, while not really impressing the people he's courting with it...

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 4:30 pm
by Econoline
Sue U wrote:The day before the election, he admits to being a fraud and a liar all along. Fuck you, Bibi.
From the link (regarding Isaac Herzog):
He has, however, made Mr. Netanyahu’s alienation of allies, especially Washington, a prime campaign point, and said Israel’s international isolation is itself a security threat.
Well, gee, ya think?

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 5:24 pm
by Sue U
I expect that at any minute now, Netanyahu will be ordering an investigation into the missing strawberries.

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 6:26 pm
by Lord Jim
If there are five votes he thinks he can pick from the "What happened to the strawberries?" constituency, you can count on it...

I see where he also tried to get national TV time for a "press conference" today, (ELECTION DAY) but the Election Panel put the kibosh on that:
Election panel deems Netanyahu press conference 'illegal propaganda'
http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel-elec ... 5/1.647304

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 6:39 pm
by Sue U
Econoline wrote:In so many nations which use some sort of party-based parliamentary system, there are often long periods when there is effectively NO government running things.
You say that like it's a bad thing.

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:26 am
by Sue U
Just under 72% voter turnout. Virtually everyone is declaring victory. Likud and ZU (Labor/HaT'nuah) seem to be tied at 27 seats. The two centrist parties would like to play king-maker, but even together they couldn't make it to a majority. The "natural" affiliations of the smaller parties make it more likely that Likud will be tapped to put together a government, but it will likely be weak and subject to some instability.

Unless they can negotiate a unity government with Likud and ZU together. Which would be highly ironic in light of their respective campaign slogans: Netanyahu's was "It's Us Or Them." Herzog and Livni countered with "It's Us Or Him." :lol: And even together, they'd still need at least one of the centrist parties: Yesh Atid (meaning "We Have A Future") and Kulanu (meaning "All Of Us Together"). :lol: :lol:

Re: And Now A Look At The Israeli Election...

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:39 am
by Guinevere
NYTimes and BBC are reporting a "clear" victory for Bibi. Sadly.