Page 1 of 2
First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:27 am
by Joe Guy
Rand Paul - curly little dweeb
Mike Huckabee - a guy that showed up
Ted Cruz - Dan Quayle after a frontal lobotomy
Ben Carson - Is very good at lullabies and helps me sleep
Donald Trump - An enormous over-inflated blimp with a wig
Jeb Bush - The third brother
Scott Walker - If he didn't show up no one would have noticed
Carly Fiorina - The wicked witch of the east
John Kasich - A nice guy that wishes he was Ronald Reagan
Chris Christie - As president he would annoy anyone who opposes him by creating slow traffic on a nearby bridge
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:29 am
by wesw
jake tapper- sorry excuse for a moderator.....
THIS JUST IN
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 3:48 am
by RayThom
http://www.nytimes.com/live/second-repu ... tion-2016/
I bet the Trumpster will gain even more in the polls. The RNC convention is going to be quite exciting. I still think Jeb! will be the nomination, however.
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 5:36 am
by Gob
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:34 am
by Lord Jim
I thought this was a better debate than the first one; the format was looser, allowing for more give and take between the candidates. (And Wes, I thought Tapper did an excellent job by using a light hand and giving the candidates an opportunity to respond to each other, and add comments even if it wasn't their "turn")
I thought there was a clear winner; and that winner was Carly Fiorina. She was very poised, in command of the facts, and beat Trumpty like a drum... (her handling of the question about the personal appearance insult at the end of the first segment in particular was an absolute bullseye.)
I personally don't think Fiorina is qualified to be President, but she certainly does her homework. Of the three unqualified candidates, (the other two of course being Trump and Carson) she would definitely get my vote. I'll be very surprised if she doesn't get a bump in her poll numbers as a result of last night.
Rubio also had an excellent night. I thought he came across with a lot more "gravitas" than he did in the first debate. Christie also did fairly well, and Jeb may have helped himself a bit.
Except for a cheap shot at Paul, and and his childish badgering of Bush over what was obviously a misstatement regarding Planned Parenthood, (which perfectly teed up Fiorina's response on the insult question) I got the impression that Train Wreck was trying to "rein it in" a bit...
In a post debate interview when asked who he thought had done the best in the debate rather than give the expected answer, "Me obviously; it wasn't even close between me and all these losers", he repeatedly said, "I think every one did really well"...
Very Un-Trumpian...
It also seemed to me that overall all the candidates upped their game in the energy department over the first debate, which made Trump a less dominant presence.
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:20 am
by wesw
I thought Tapper hogged all questions, and that his mission was to get the candidates to attack each other, not to flesh out the issues.
if your main concern was taking down trump, then I see why you thought it was excellent. I am surprised that you allowed your distaste for trump to jade your view of the debate moderation, which was designed to malign your party as a whole.
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:44 am
by Lord Jim
if your main concern was taking down trump, then I see why you thought it was excellent. I am surprised that you allowed your distaste for trump to jade your view of the debate moderation, which was designed to malign your party as a whole.
At the moment, I don't see
anything that could benefit my party's prospects for re-taking the White House
more than Donald Trump being taken down...I'm unaware of any electoral model under which the GOP nominee wins the election with 15% of the Hispanic vote, and Trump would be lucky to get that...
Unfortunately though, I have to agree with what Nicole Wallace said on
Morning Joe a little while ago...
Even though Trump was thoroughly exposed last night, his supporters won't care.
Trump supporters don't care about facts; if they did, they wouldn't be Trump supporters....
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:53 am
by wesw
the problem is...
...if trump supporters don t vote in the general election, you lose.
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:44 pm
by Guinevere
Frank Brunai characterized it all perfectly:
It was a debate that worked almost in spite of itself.
As the hours dragged on, the issues were indeed hashed out: whether a Republican president should immediately tear up the Iran deal or wait and see; whether the federal government should be shut down in the service of defunding Planned Parenthood; whether a wall along the Mexican border is a feasible plan or empty bluster.
But that substance had to muscle its way through the show business, by which I mean Donald Trump’s attempt to turn everything into an adolescent popularity contest and CNN’s willingness to reward that by filtering the entire evening through the prism of the Republican field’s proven ratings magnet: Trump, Trump, Trump.
What did Trump think of something mean that someone else on the stage had said about him? What did someone else think about something nasty that Trump had said about him or her?
Trump had insulted Jeb Bush’s wife: Discuss! Trump had insulted Carly Fiorina’s business career: Respond!
So it went, somewhat tediously and surreally, for many stretches of the debate on Wednesday night and especially for the first half-hour, during which Rand Paul took the precise measure of — and raised the correct question about — the egomaniacal front-runner.
“Do we want someone with that kind of character, that kind of careless language, to be negotiating with Putin?” Paul asked.
“I think really there’s a sophomoric quality that is entertaining about Mr. Trump, but I am worried,” he added, and I nodded so vigorously at the “worried” part that I’m going to need balm and a neck brace tomorrow.
Paul went on to single out Trump’s “visceral response to attack people on their appearance — short, tall, fat, ugly. My goodness, that happened in junior high. Are we not way above that?”
No, we aren’t. Or at least Trump isn’t. And “junior high” is too easy on him, too kind. Trump comes from, and belongs in, the sandbox, as he demonstrated the second that Paul paused and Trump fired back: “I never attacked him on his look, and believe me, there’s plenty of subject matter right there.”
How lovely. And how adult. And less than an hour later, Fiorina had to stand there and try not to squirm as she was asked to react to Trump’s recent comments about her in a Rolling Stone interview: “Look at that face. Would anyone vote for that?”
Fiorina held her head, including her face, high. “I think women all over this country heard very clearly what Mr. Trump said,” she stated tightly, and with more dignity than Trump or the situation deserved.
Trump rushed in: “I think she’s got a beautiful face and I think she’s a beautiful woman.” Watch out, Carly. Next comes an invitation for a private ride in his Trump-i-copter.
I mentioned my nodding, but my real injuries came from shaking my head, over and over, because I couldn’t quite believe the Trump-centric nature of it all. I’m still mystified that he’s done this well in the polls for this long.
I know that Americans have lost faith in institutions — understandably. I know that Americans are turned off by politics as usual — justly.
But have we sunk to a point where we’re prepared to reach for someone so careless with his insinuations, so merrily and irresponsibly ignorant, that he used some of his precious time on Wednesday night to fan irrational, repudiated fears about a link between vaccines and autism?
Are we buoyed by a bully who calls anyone who disagrees with him a “loser,” promises vaguely that his presidency will be “unbelievable” (his favorite adjective, and an unintentionally telling one), and presents little besides his tumescent ego and stagey rage?
The CNN anchor Jake Tapper, who was the debate’s moderator, pressed hard to get Trump to say, with even a scintilla of specificity, why he believes that he’d be more effective in dealing with Vladimir Putin than Obama has been.
And all that Trump could muster was: “I would get along with him.”
How? Why? Not a single detail. But Trump doesn’t do details. He just crows that he will know the most, be the best and win. He’s a broken record of grandiose, self-infatuated music.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/op ... ?referrer=
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:45 pm
by Econoline
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:53 pm
by Sue U
Which is more preferable, Ted Cruz or genital warts? Compare and contrast.
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:58 pm
by wesw
...but don t you dare make a joke about Hillary s pants suit or old age....
tho she does look good in a pants suit , for an eighty yr old woman......

Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 1:09 pm
by TPFKA@W
When Christy (I believe it was) was asked which woman should be on the $10 bill, he said the Adams family, and I thought for a split second he was going to make a joke and say Morticia.
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 5:03 pm
by rubato
Carson and Paul should both have to take remedial classes to keep their medical licenses. They both flubbed the vaccine question and appear not acquainted with the science at even a rudimentary level.
Carson alluded to vaccines for things which are not deadly or crippling and said those should be optional (Really Dr Carson, which ones are those?). And Paul alluded to allowing parents not to use bundled vaccines (Really Dr. Paul? You think giving 5 separate injections is less painful and less expensive? 5 visits, 5 co-pays, 5 days off work taking the child to the Dr.)
The science-based answer to the vaccine question is "Vaccines do not cause autism". Two people running for president who are so fixated on not losing votes that they can't tell the truth when it is well proven and when educating the public would be valuable. They would rather allow children to be sickened and killed by preventable diseases rather than risk losing a vote.
yrs,
rubato
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 5:22 pm
by Sue U
I didn't see the entire Top
10 11 debate (it was back to school night at the middle school, appropriately enough), but in the hour and a half or so I did see, the only candidate who hurt himself was Trump ("I promise I'll learn something about foreign affairs by the time I'm president, and it will be unbelievable; also, vaccines cause autism.").
The most hilarious line I heard was from ¿Jeb?, who was clueless enough to say, "Say what you will about my brother, he kept us safe!" I just about died from laughing/head explosion.
I thought Rubio was again very articulate, well-spoken and sincere. It's a shame his policy positions are completely lunatic.
Carly Fiorina fit in well with the big boys club, as she is just as unhinged as the rest of them ("Hillary did Benghazi!").
Chris Christie and Scott Walker reminded America that there is a chance they still might be breathing, although on a ventilator. Ben Carson came off as already brain dead.
Rand Paul lost any chance he might have had at the GOP nom when he said it might not be a good idea to go killing people in other countries especially with Americans who might get killed themselves, and how maybe we shouldn't put so many black people in prison.
Kasich: "I could win Ohio."

Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 7:32 pm
by Big RR
Carson alluded to vaccines for things which are not deadly or crippling and said those should be optional (Really Dr Carson, which ones are those?).
I'm not certain what he meant, but I would imagine Chickenpox and Mumps would fall within this; possibly rubella (although the birth defects it can cause could be crippling); possibly flu and pneumonia as well. Now clearly any disease can have deadly or crippling effects, but iit is rare to nonexistent with these (although Merck has done a good job with chickenpox to try and stoke the flames). But some of Carson's other comments on vaccines were inane. And Paul is just completely off the wall as well.
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:39 pm
by Gob
The view from Canada...
Tucked away in an upstairs corner of a pub in downtown Calgary, Alberta, a group of American ex-pats and interested Canadians gathered to watch Wednesday night's Republican US presidential debate.
Although they have their own nation's politics to worry about - this western city is hosting a debate for the party leaders on Thursday, and Canadian's general election just over a month away - they were irresistibly drawn to the spectacle of the US event.
"I call American politics my Jersey Shore," says Mike Guadet, referencing the reality television show best known for its train wreck personalities.
"How can you beat those characters? Donald Trump, Carly Fiorina - they're interesting, and they say ridiculous things sometimes, but sometimes they say poetic things."
Continues here...
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:56 am
by wesw
lol, trump making more faces than a mime.....
bush grinning like a simpleton.....
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 3:24 pm
by rubato
"... As the beer flowed and the debate drew to a conclusion, the consensus among the group of nearly a dozen spectators who came to the event hosted by Democrats Abroad matched fairly closely to the analyses from most US commentators. The crowd was left-leaning, but as Gaudet noted, Conservatives in Canada would probably be Democrats in the US anyway. ... "
yrs,
rubato
Re: First Impressions of the 2nd Debate Participants
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 3:46 pm
by Big RR
sometimes they say poetic things
I must have missed those.