epa report on bees

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

epa report on bees

Post by wesw »


wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: epa report on bees

Post by wesw »

first link is to mother jones, sorry
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... 6085,d.eWE

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

wesw. HERE'S A THOUGHT

Post by RayThom »

Once you find the link that finally works properly go back and delete all the broken links you posted. Your repetitious nonsense is really getting tedious, man. You'll thank me later.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9795
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: wesw. HERE'S A THOUGHT

Post by Bicycle Bill »

RayThom wrote:Once you find the link that finally works properly go back and delete all the broken links you posted. Your repetitious nonsense is really getting tedious, man. You'll thank me later.
I was thinking maybe he could practice reading the links and then putting the gist of it into his own words.  Leave the link/URL at the end for those of us who may want to read more about it.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: epa report on bees

Post by wesw »

I think that both links work, I just don t like mother jones....

and bill, i just can t win in that regard. i would rather do as you suggested, but then others say...


link?


what, no link?

it would be really nice if you gave enough of a shit to post a link, you beast!!!!

(i made the last one up, but only just...)

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: epa report on bees

Post by Guinevere »

Jim Jones, Assistant Administrator. Wow. I worked with him when I was a young EPA staffer and he was the special assistant to the Assistant Administrator. The chess pieces may move around, but they sure don't change much.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9795
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: epa report on bees

Post by Bicycle Bill »

wesw wrote:and bill, i just can t win in that regard. i would rather do as you suggested, but then others say...

link?  what, no link?

it would be really nice if you gave enough of a shit to post a link, you beast!!!!

(i made the last one up, but only just...)
Ahem ..... read *ALL* of my post the next time, OK?
I was thinking maybe he could practice reading the links and then putting the gist of it into his own words.  Leave the link/URL at the end for those of us who may want to read more about it.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: epa report on bees

Post by Long Run »

Seems the bee post created another hornet's nest.

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: epa report on bees

Post by wesw »

:lol:

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: epa report on bees

Post by wesw »

ok, the neonicotinoids have been a known cause of colony collapse disorder for 20 yrs and it has been covered up by the chemical companies and their paid off lackeys in our, and other , govts....

greedy corrupt bastards.

....and now for something completely different....

...rube, I would really like to know your take on this.

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: epa report on bees

Post by Guinevere »

EPA has only once banned a pesticide because of ecological (non-human health) effects. Once. And you may thank yours truly for pushing and advocating and making that happen.

Because pesticides are actually necessary in some cases (although the amount and scale is clearly debatable), they are required to be regulated based on balancing the risks (toxicity x exposure) against the benefits (typically economic impact to the user). It makes for a difficult calculation since the impact of no use is incredibly difficult to quantify.

There has been no cover-up. I know all the pesticide folks. Colony collapse has not been widely studied until recently, and EPA has been overly focused on the food supply (per Congress and its last revisions to FIFRA - the federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act).
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9795
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: epa report on bees

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Guinevere wrote:EPA has only once banned a pesticide because of ecological (non-human health) effects. Once. And you may thank yours truly for pushing and advocating and making that happen
Are you trying to tell us that *YOU* were responsible for the banning of DDT?
Maybe you should be using "Rachel Carson" as your handle and something like this
Image
as your avatar.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: epa report on bees

Post by Guinevere »

Sorry, since DDT. Although in fact, DDT was only banned by EPA because of a court order not because of its regulatory responsibilities (and the process was started first by President Kennedy and the Science Advisory Committee before EPA even existed).
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: epa report on bees

Post by rubato »

Guinevere wrote:EPA has only once banned a pesticide because of ecological (non-human health) effects. Once. And you may thank yours truly for pushing and advocating and making that happen. ... act).
I didn't think you were old enough to be working in 1972.


Yrs,
Rubato

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: epa report on bees

Post by wesw »

maybe it hasn t been widely studied, but it was studied and blamed on these same pesticides 20 yrs ago, by a narrow group of folks who didn t give a shit about the pesticide folks or their blood money

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21467
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: epa report on bees

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

rubato wrote:
Guinevere wrote:EPA has only once banned a pesticide because of ecological (non-human health) effects. Once. And you may thank yours truly for pushing and advocating and making that happen. ... act).
I didn't think you were old enough to be working in 1972.


Yrs,
Rubato

Some part of "since DDT" in Guin's explanatory message above that you missed?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: epa report on bees

Post by rubato »

That post was not visible when I posted.

My iPad is loading funny on the local wifi. No idea why.


Yrs,
Rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21467
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: epa report on bees

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

OK :ok
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply