Page 1 of 2
A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 1:23 am
by Gob
I do hope rubato isn't too upset that his president is spoken of in this way.
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:01 am
by Bicycle Bill
And this is from someone who doesn't even have skin in the game and can sit back along the sidelines and see how this plays out.
Imagine how the poor bastards that are going to be the targets of this small-handed sodomite will react once his indiscriminate buttfucking of the American people moves into high gear.
-"BB"-
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 1:54 pm
by wesw
you are nothing , if not a gentleman, BB....
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:13 pm
by BoSoxGal
Thanks for the share, Gob!
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:15 pm
by Lord Jim
That famous British understatement...
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:49 pm
by rubato
He is proof positive that there is no level of morality and competence which is so low that Republicans will fail to vote for a Republican en masse.
yrs,
rubato
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:54 pm
by rubato
Mitt Romney had a fleeting moment of clarity when he denounced Trump as unfit but the minute someone told him that there was something he wanted and it was secreted between T-rump's butt cheeks Mitty was down on his knees trying to tongue-fish it out.
An action which proves him to be well into T-rump's league for loathsomeness.
yrs,
rubato
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:55 pm
by Lord Jim
rubato wrote:He is proof positive that there is no level of morality and competence which is so low that Republicans will fail to vote for a Republican en masse.
yrs,
rubato
LMAO!!!
How many times has rube had it explained to him that many Republicans did not vote for Trump, and that Trump couldn't possibly have won the election with only Republican votes anyway?
Five? Six? I've lost count...

Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 7:45 pm
by Guinevere
But the Republicans nominated him, and put him in the position to become president of the United States. And that in 100% on them.
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:08 pm
by Lord Jim
Guinevere wrote:But the Republicans nominated him, and put him in the position to become president of the United States. And that in 100% on them.
Not with
my help they didn't... I got involved helping an organization (made up of Republicans) that was trying to deny him the nomination even after he had gotten the delegate votes to win it, (in fact I was involved with other Republicans trying to get him off the ticket even as late as
a month before the election)
Also of course, Trump won the nomination with more than 50% of Republican primary and caucus voters voting
against him...
But if you
really want to play the "100% on them" game, I suppose it's also worth pointing out that the
Democrats managed to nominate someone who could
lose to Donald Trump....
And that is 100% on
them...

Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:12 pm
by Guinevere
Lord Jim wrote:Guinevere wrote:But the Republicans nominated him, and put him in the position to become president of the United States. And that in 100% on them.
Not with
my help they didn't... I got involved helping an organization (made up of Republicans) that was trying to deny him the nomination even after he had gotten the delegate votes to win it, (in fact I was involved with other Republicans trying to get him off the ticket even as late as
a month before the election)
Too little, and far too late.
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:25 pm
by BoSoxGal
I agree with rubato that Mitt Romney's capitulation to Trump in hopes of a job was the end of his credibility, even though I rooted for him to get SoS. He should have known Trump was just toying with him for revenge, and he should have led the loyal opposition instead - because he should have been unwilling to work for a man he described so harshly & accurately as utterly unfit to serve.
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:34 pm
by Bicycle Bill
wesw wrote:you are nothing , if not a gentleman, BB....
Researchers at the U of Cambridge have released results from a study which finds that people who swear are generally more honest.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... don-t.html
And the journal "Language Sciences" has posited that people who swear are smarter and have a better vocabulary than their clean-mouthed brethren.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 74256.html

Certain people excepted, of course.
-"BB"-
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:40 pm
by rubato
The numbers prove all by themselves that nearly all Republicans voted for T-rump. He was only elected because of that fact.
Very few stayed home or voted for a different candidate.
yrs,
rubato
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:57 pm
by Lord Jim
Researchers at the U of Cambridge have released results from a study which finds that people who swear are generally more honest.
And the journal "Language Sciences" has posited that people who swear are smarter and have a better vocabulary that their clean-mouthed brethren.
Well shit, those two things are fuckin' obvious...
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:58 pm
by Guinevere
Damn fucking straight.
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:25 pm
by rubato
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news-ex ... residency/
Search Results
According to the exit polls, Republicans stayed loyal to their presidential candidate. Some 89 percent of self-described Republicans voted for Trump; 91 percent of white Republicans did. In contrast, only 84 percent of white Democrats voted for Clinton.Nov 9, 2016
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:43 pm
by Lord Jim
Yes rube, I'm aware of those numbers, (and of course I am in that non-Trump voting 11%) but here's a fact that I'm sure you won't acknowledge, but is nevertheless less true...
After Trump was nominated, those responding to pollsters as "self-described Republicans" include a substantial number of people who previously would not have identified themselves as Republicans except for the fact that Trump was the Republican nominee, and do not include a substantial number of long-time Republican voters who chose to identify themselves as independents because Trump was the nominee....
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:49 pm
by Gob
Just in case this gets lost....
Re: A British Reporter
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 11:18 pm
by Lord Jim
Gob wrote:
Just in case this gets lost....
Oh great, another Thread Topic Nazi...
