Page 1 of 1

An awesome display of raw ignorance.

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:20 pm
by rubato
And we thought that the bottom of the GOP barrel had been scraped to come up with Bush-Co! Hell no. As utterly incompetent and ignorant as he was there was a still lower level that 90% of the GOP would suck ass to:


http://economistsview.typepad.com/econo ... ength.html
Paul Krugman: Ignorance Is Strength

There's a reason Republicans don't like experts:

Ignorance Is Strength. by Paul Krugman, NY Times: When I travel to Asia, I’m fairly often met at the airport by someone holding a sign reading “Mr. Paul.” Why? In much of Asia, names are given family first, personal second — at home, the prime minister of Japan is referred to as Abe Shinzo. And the mistake is completely forgivable when it’s made by a taxi driver picking up a professor.

It’s not so forgivable, however, if the president ... makes the same mistake when welcoming the leader of one of our most important economic and security partners. But there it was: Donald Trump referring to Mr. Abe as, yes, Prime Minister Shinzo.

Mr. Abe did not, as far as we know, respond by calling his host President Donald.

Trivial? Well, it would be if it were an isolated instance. But it isn’t. What we’ve seen instead over the past three weeks is an awesome display of raw ignorance on every front. Worse, there’s no hint that either the White House or its allies in Congress see this as a problem. They appear to believe that expertise, or even basic familiarity with a subject, is for wimps; ignorance is strength. ...

And that is, of course, the point. Competent lawyers might tell you that your Muslim ban is unconstitutional; competent scientists that climate change is real; competent economists that tax cuts don’t pay for themselves; competent voting experts that there weren’t millions of illegal ballots; competent diplomats that the Iran deal makes sense, and Putin is not your friend. So competence must be excluded.

At this point, someone is bound to say, “If they’re so dumb, how come they won?” Part of the answer is that disdain for experts — sorry, “so-called” experts — resonates with an important part of the electorate. Bigotry wasn’t the only dark force at work in the election; so was anti-intellectualism, hostility toward “elites” who claim that opinions should be based on careful study and thought. ...

In some ways this cluelessness may be a good thing: malevolence may ... be tempered by incompetence. It’s not just the court defeat over immigration; Republican ignorance has turned what was supposed to be a blitzkrieg against Obamacare into a quagmire, to the great benefit of millions. And Mr. Trump’s imploding job approval might help slow the march to autocracy.

But meanwhile, who’s in charge? Crises happen, and we have an intellectual vacuum at the top. Be afraid, be very afraid.

yrs,
rubato

Re: An awesome display of raw ignorance.

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:11 pm
by Big RR
You expected anything different?

Re: An awesome display of raw ignorance.

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:26 pm
by Burning Petard
But even the experts don't like the experts. From the NY Times Sunday magazine section:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/07/maga ... .html?_r=0

This isn’t the first time Haldane has been critical of the current state of macroeconomics — that’s the big-picture, whole-economy side of the profession. Last fall he gave an important, broad-ranging speech with the elegant title “The Dappled World,” in which he argued that the unexpected global downturn that began in late 2007 has left behind “a crisis in the economics and finance profession.” Economic forecasts on the eve of the credit crunch and the Great Recession were, he says, “not just wrong but spectacularly so.” The overall trajectory of precrisis forecasts was upward; the reality was a brutally deep capital V.

In retrospect, the failure of the discipline to predict and prevent the crisis was based on deep conceptual faults. One of these concerned a mysterious refusal to engage with the role of the banking and finance system in the economy. Another was the assumption that the discipline makes about individual motivations, assuming that individuals “optimize” their decision-making to behave, in economic terms, rationally. This is a convenient intellectual shortcut for building models, but it is also a fiction, as we know not just from our own human experience but even from within economics itself, where microeconomics has recently made exciting progress in the study of human irrationality, bias and cognitive error. It is a matter of provable fact that our decision-making is not entirely rational. Economic models built on the premise of our rationality will always have a creaky underpinning.

Reminds me of our last president, #33 (all the administrations since Harry have been run by committee) "Can somebody give me a one-handed economist?" But since the quote at the head of this thread is from Paul Krugman, the experts here will pronounce it a pure falsehood.

snailgate

Re: An awesome display of raw ignorance.

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:06 pm
by Lord Jim
The subject line:
An awesome display of raw ignorance.
Posted by rubato, followed by an article written by the well known liar and partisan hack Paul Krugman...

My, how very appropriate...

Re: An awesome display of raw ignorance.

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:06 am
by Gob
Beat me to it.
An awesome display of raw ignorance.

Rubato.
Man alive, it doesn't come more accurate than that, Double Cock is the personification of raw ignorance.