Page 1 of 1

Political Correctness, Australian Style...

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:38 am
by Lord Jim
Apparently everything is so great in Australia, the only thing people can find to bitch about is when to celebrate their National Day:
The evolution of Australia Day controversy

Australia's national day of celebration has drawn much criticism recently from those who say it causes unfair hurt to indigenous people. But the controversy, like Australia Day itself, has evolved over many years, reports Sharon Verghis from Sydney.

More than most other nations, perhaps, Australia has a relaxed relationship to its national day.

Australia Day, on 26 January, commemorates the day in 1788 when Captain Arthur Phillip, commander of the First Fleet of 11 British ships, arrived at Sydney Cove to signal the birth of the colony.

On Friday, many in this nation of 24 million people will once again gather on beaches and around barbeques to celebrate.

From regattas to camel races, flip-flop-throwing carnivals to outdoor concerts, Australians will mark a public holiday more popularly treated as a late summer festival than the solemn national day its founders intended it to be - a unifying celebration of the good fortune of being Australian and the values that bind the nation: democracy, freedom, independence, a fair go, mateship.

But what does 26 January really mean for Australians and how did it come to be?

An old and new celebration

Like all national days, the significance attached to Australia Day has changed over time.

It is also, in its current form, relatively new. Not until 1994 was there consistently a national public holiday on 26 January, rather than on the nearest Monday.

In 1818, New South Wales (NSW) formally marked 30 years as a colony with a triumphant 30-gun salute, the first official celebration of the date. It became an annual public holiday there in 1838 and remained a NSW-centric commemoration for many years.

But by 1888, 26 January had become known as "Anniversary Day" and was a public holiday in all capital cities except Adelaide.

The inauguration of the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901 reinforced momentum for a foundation holiday. By the 1920s, Anzac Day had become a national holiday but was regarded as a day of sombre commemoration of Australia's war casualties rather than a celebration.

The search for a national day that fit this latter description continued - ending in 1935 when all states of Australia agreed to adopt a common name and date.

In the 1980s, the Australian government began to take an increasingly prominent role and established the National Australia Day Committee. By 1994, all states and territories began to celebrate a unified public holiday on the actual day for the first time.

How opposition was voiced

Australian historian Prof Kate Darian-Smith, from the University of Tasmania, says that Australia Day, now far from its roots, sparks a sometimes heated annual public debate about cultural identity, history and what it means to be Australian.

"In the commemorations in 1938, and then in 1988, there were restagings of the arrival of the First Fleet to Australia - and we would not see this now," she says.

"Australia Day had become a politicised flashpoint for discussion about how we should celebrate the past, and recognising what the day means for indigenous people."

For indigenous Australia, a historic protest came during sesquicentenary (150 years) celebrations in Sydney in 1938, when more than 100 Aboriginal people gathered for a conference to mark the "Day of Mourning".

But the notion that indigenous Australians had been "robbed" of their land by the colonists was even acknowledged in the 19th Century by Henry Parkes, a NSW premier.

In 1988, a protest march of more than 40,000 indigenous and non-indigenous people took place in Sydney, entrenching a tradition of "survival day" and "invasion day" concerts, marches and protests which continue today.

Indigenous protest has continued to grow, mirroring similar movements surrounding days commemorating European colonisation, such as Thanksgiving in the US. It has dovetailed with heightened political and community activism coalescing around a "change the date" campaign.

The push has been spearheaded by the left-wing Australian Greens and others who regard the date as more divisive than unifying, making Australia Day the antithesis of the harmonious national festival organisers had intended.

Grassroots protests within the last year have ranged from some local councils in Melbourne dropping their Australia Day events, to radio station Triple J moving the unofficial soundtrack for Australia Day - its iconic Hottest 100 - to a different date.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-42798864

I saw an Aussie fellow on CNN this morning proposing this as an alternative:
There is however, a very good alternative that would (presumably) offend no one and which does all the things January 26 cannot.

That is, it marks a date on which multiple steps have been taken on the path to modern Australia's creation. A day when this new nation took practical form with its first sitting of the federal parliament, and which was reinforced subsequently, with the very first sittings in the newly created capital, and finally, the first sitting in the new (permanent) Parliament House on Capital Hill.

That date is May 9 – the same day in 1901 when we became a self-governing federation; again in 1927, when the Parliament shifted to Canberra (from Melbourne); and finally, in the bicentennial year of 1988, when the current Parliament House was opened.

What better way to celebrate the great milestones of nationhood than its formalisation as an institutional democracy empowered to make its own national laws under its own constitution?
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/australia ... 0m65w.html

Re: Political Correctness, Australian Style...

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2018 7:30 pm
by Joe Guy
....That date is May 9 – the same day in 1901 when we became a self-governing federation;.....
Great idea. They can call the celebration "Nueve de Mayo".

Re: Political Correctness, Australian Style...

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2018 7:53 pm
by Scooter
There was a similar controversy here over celebration of the 150th year of Confederation, where a lot of indigenous peoples argued that we were celebrating the foundation of a nation that was created, literally, over their dead bodies. Many communities made space in their celebrations for indigenous peoples to tell their stories and conduct peaceful protests.

So I'm not sure if changing the date to one on which white setttlers created the institutions that were used to oppress indigenous peoples would be seen as any more "unifying" than the date when white settlers first arrived. Perhaps intentionally incorporating some of their protest messaging into the day's celebrations would give them the sense that they are being heard and provide a forum for educating the public about their grievances. Which, in many cases, is really all that they want.