Plan B Forum

Poll: Nearly half of Republicans think Trump should have authority to shutter media outlets

Forty-three percent of Republicans think President Trump “should have the authority to close news outlets engaged in bad behavior,” while only 36 percent disagreed with the statement, according to an Ipsos poll released Tuesday.

A large number of Republicans polled also took issue with the media in general, with 48 percent agreeing that the news media is “the enemy of the American people.” Seventy-nine percent said mainstream media outlets treat Trump “unfairly.”

The Daily Beast first reported the poll results.

While Republicans criticized the media in higher numbers than Democrats and independents, 12 percent of Democrats and 21 percent of independents said the president should have the power to close down news operations “engaged in bad behavior.”
Twelve percent of Democrats and 26 percent of independents agreed the media is “the enemy of the American people."

Trump has repeatedly criticized members of the media on Twitter and at campaign rallies. During a rally last Friday in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., the president lambasted the media as the “fake, fake disgusting news.”

The stance has split Republicans in the executive and legislative branches. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders refused to denounce the “fake news” moniker, while Ivanka Trump and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) have said the press is not the enemy of the people.

A majority of all those polled seemed to agree with Trump and Graham, with 57 percent saying the media was “necessary to keep the Trump administration honest.”

However, respondents also seemed overwhelmingly willing to open journalists up to lawsuits, with 72 percent agreeing it should be easier to sue reporters who knowingly publish false information.

Ipsos surveyed 1,003 American adults online from Aug. 3 to 6. The poll did not have a margin of error, but had a credibility interval of 3.5 percentage points.

Long Run wrote:With respect to the minority of R's that appear to favor some form of media censorship, I don't think liberals have much ground to wag a finger since they've been cheering Facebook, Apple, and Youtube closing down access for a major conservative wingnut

Long Run wrote:With respect to the minority of R's that appear to favor some form of media censorship, I don't think liberals have much ground to wag a finger since they've been cheering Facebook, Apple, and Youtube closing down access for a major conservative wingnut and are arguing for shutting down other conservative views (in addition to the aggressive and often violent demonstrations against conservative speakers, protests and demonstrations). There appears to be a substantial minority on both sides that would favor shutting up the opposition.

and you'll get a *VERY* different response from those same Republicans.

Big RR wrote: I don't see how else it can be spun; this is a power despots crave, and a large percentage of those polled would give it to our president. That scares the hell out of me; I'm surprised you have no problem rationalizing it.

Facebook or Youtube were owned by Rupert Murdoch (how did he not end up owning them!) and he took away those platforms from liberal voices, I am pretty sure we'd be hearing arguments that those entities are the equivalent of the public square and should be regulated like other media outlets to ensure fair representation, etc.

wesw wrote:yes, BP, but the airwaves are public, and the internet has become no different than other utilities.

a new anti trust push seems needed.

wesw wrote:these social media sites are public forums, in my view, and free speech and association must apply to their forums.