Good For You, Mr. Chief Justice...
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 8:52 pm
Though now Il Boobce will probably start calling him a "So-called Justice"...
I have made the point before that just because a judge has been appointed by a Republican, and has a conservative judicial philosophy, doesn't mean they are going to automatically rule for every Trump overreach attempt to expand Executive power, or to protect him personally. (Not even conservative judges and justices appointed by Trump can be counted on to behave that way; I've pointed out a couple of times before that Neil Gosrsuch has already ruled against a Trump power grab in a major immigration case.)
Many conservative jurists (I would argue most of them) are philosophically opposed to unchecked Executive power, (no matter who is President) and are also every bit as appalled by Trump's constant attacks on the integrity of the Judicial branch that they serve in as any other patriotic American.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... ma-n939016In rare rebuke, Chief Justice Roberts slams Trump for comment about 'Obama judge'
The country does not have "Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," the leader of the federal judiciary said.
By Pete Williams and Associated Press
WASHINGTON — In a highly unusual public statement, Chief Justice John Roberts rebutted President Donald Trump's statement that a ruling against the administration was made by "an Obama judge."
Asked Wednesday by the Associated Press about the president's comment, Roberts responded, "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them."
He added on the day before Thanksgiving that an "independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for."[Amen. With a Congress that completely abrogated it's Constitutional responsibilities for the past two years, it's been pretty much the only institutional check we've had on Trump's efforts to trample the Constitution and the rule of law.]
It's the first time the Republican-appointed leader of the federal judiciary has offered even a hint of criticism of Trump, who has previously blasted federal judges who ruled against him.
Trump made the comment Tuesday before leaving the White House to spend the holiday in Florida. He was responding to questions about Monday's ruling by Federal District Court Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco that put a temporary hold on the administration's plan for refusing to consider asylum applications from immigrants who cross the border illegally.
"You go the 9th Circuit and it's a disgrace," Trump said. "And I'm going to put in a major complaint because you cannot win — if you're us — a case in the 9th Circuit and I think it's a disgrace. This was an Obama judge. And I'll tell you what, it's not going to happen like this anymore."
Tigar was nominated by President Barack Obama, but Roberts has consistently pushed back against claims that judges made decisions based on political considerations.
"I will not criticize the political branches," he said in a speech in October. "Our role is very clear. We are to interpret the Constitution and laws of the United States and ensure that the political branches act within them."
Even so, Roberts has had resisted responding directly to Trump's attacks on judges.
Trump said it was a "so-called judge" who issued the first federal ruling against his travel ban. During the 2016 presidential campaign, after calling for a wall on the southern border, he said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel might be biased against him in a trial over Trump University because of the judge's Mexican heritage.
Trump's latest remarks come as the Supreme Court is enmeshed in controversy over his appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Several justices have spoken out about judicial independence and the danger of having the court viewed as a political institution that is divided between five conservative Republicans and four liberal Democrats.
The White House had no immediate response to a request for comment on Roberts' criticism on Wednesday. [Trump has slammed Roberts in the past, (mainly over his vote to uphold the Constitutionality of Obamacare) so I think it's a safe bet he will in short order do so again...]
I have made the point before that just because a judge has been appointed by a Republican, and has a conservative judicial philosophy, doesn't mean they are going to automatically rule for every Trump overreach attempt to expand Executive power, or to protect him personally. (Not even conservative judges and justices appointed by Trump can be counted on to behave that way; I've pointed out a couple of times before that Neil Gosrsuch has already ruled against a Trump power grab in a major immigration case.)
Many conservative jurists (I would argue most of them) are philosophically opposed to unchecked Executive power, (no matter who is President) and are also every bit as appalled by Trump's constant attacks on the integrity of the Judicial branch that they serve in as any other patriotic American.