Should ISIS 'brides' lose their citizenship?
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 2:31 am
I'm probably not serious about that last one. But I am curious what people think about this.
yrs,
rubato
yrs,
rubato
have fun, relax, but above all ARGUE!
http://www.theplanbforum.com/forum/
http://www.theplanbforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=19465
So while in my opinion she does not deserve to be let back into the country — she made her bed, now let her lie in it — everything I've read indicates that she was born in the USA. Therefore I must agree with RayThom and select option '2' here. Let her back in and, if she has in fact violated any laws concerning acts committed against the US, then charge her with the same and let due process take its course.1) Falsification or Concealment of Relevant Facts: You must be absolutely truthful when filling out paperwork and answering interview questions related to the naturalization application process. Even if the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) fails to recognize any lies or ommissions at first, the agency may file a denaturalization action against you after citizenship has been granted. Examples include failure to disclose criminal activities or lying about one's real name or identity.
2) Refusal to Testify Before Congress: You may not refuse to testify before a U.S. congressional committee whose job it is to investigate your alleged involvement in subversive acts, such as those intended to harm U.S. officials or overthrow the U.S. government. This requirement to testify in order to maintain citizenship status expires after 10 years.
3) Membership in Subversive Groups: Your citizenship may be revoked if the U.S. government can prove that you joined a subversive organization within five years of becoming a naturalized citizen. Membership in such organizations is considered a violation of the oath of U.S. allegiance. Examples include the Nazi Party and Al Qaeda. (so it sounds like if you wait for five years before becoming a Nazi or a member of ISIS, they can't take your citizenship away from you.)
4) Dishonorable Military Discharge: Since you may become a naturalized U.S. citizen by virtue of serving in the U.S. military, your citizenship may be revoked if you are dishonorably discharged before serving five years. Reasons for dishonorable discharge, which must follow a general court-martial, include desertion and sexual assault.
Fuck them, let them rot in the hell holes they chose to support.Two more jihadi brides who joined Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant are believed to have been stripped of their UK citizenship while living in a refugee camp in Syria.
The disclosure came as a row intensified over the death of a three-week-old baby whose mother Shamima Begum had been stripped of her British citizenship.
Reema Iqbal, 30, along with her sister Zara Iqbal, 28, are mothers of five children between them, and are also in a camp. Legal sources told the Sunday Times that the sisters have had their citizenship removed after marrying into a terror cell linked to the execution of western hostages.
A decision to remove their citizenship will fuel fears over what happens to the children of jihadi brides.
The two women left Newham in London in 2013 for the co-called Isil caliphate. At least one of their sons was born in the UK and was taken to Syria.
The women's parents are originally from Pakistan, and the Home Office could pursue the argument that they are Pakistani nationals.
I support a woman's right to choose. Don't I?A decision to remove their citizenship will fuel fears over what happens to the children of jihadi brides
LOL!!A teenage jihadi bride who fled Melbourne to fight with the Islamic State in Syria boasted at the height of the bloodthirsty group's reign of terror about how she would only come home to Australia when it was 'part of the Islamic State'.
Now, four years later, with her husband dead and the so-called Islamic caliphate in ruins, Zehra Duman, 24, is begging to come home, claiming her two children have the right to be treated like any other 'normal kids' in Australia.
Well, just for appearances sake, he should probably get a trial first...shot for treason?
