Page 1 of 1

yer gonna need more lawyers.....

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 1:13 pm
by wesw
jack Dorsey and the post and cnn are hiring.....

:lol:

Re: yer gonna need more lawyers.....

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 1:14 pm
by wesw
zuckerberg is rumoured to be taking apps too....

8-)

yer gonna need more lawyers.....

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 3:52 pm
by RayThom
wes, FOX moves to the dark side.

Donna Brazile: Why I am excited to join Fox News and take part in a civil - and sensible - debate
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/donna-b ... ble-debate

Is real news rather than opinion journalism next?

Re: yer gonna need more lawyers.....

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:03 am
by Bicycle Bill
I've been waiting for a chance to use this one.....


Image
-"BB"-

Re: yer gonna need more lawyers.....

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:19 pm
by Scooter
Is this thread about Devin Nunes's bullshit lawsuit against Twitter? wes is as delusional as Nunes if he thinks the outcome here is going to be anything other than a judge awarding a shitload of costs against Nunes for filing what he knows is a frivolous suit.

Re: yer gonna need more lawyers.....

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:27 pm
by eddieq
Part of me wants his lawsuit to gain traction, that way the thousands of people that DJT insults and defames daily can sue him for 250 Million each.

Re: yer gonna need more lawyers.....

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2020 11:20 pm
by Scooter
Remember when wes was crowing about Twitter getting sued by Devin Nunes? Remember how I said it was bullshit? Care to guess which one of us was right?
Devin Nunes can’t sue Twitter over statements by fake cow, judge rules

A judge has ruled that Rep. Devin Nunes has no right to sue Twitter over statements made by a fake Internet cow, someone parodying his mother and a Republican strategist.

Judge John Marshall said in a decision Friday that Twitter was “immune from the defamation claims of” Nunes, R-Tulare, due to federal law that says social media companies are not liable for what people post on their platforms.

Nunes “seeks to have the court treat Twitter as the publisher or speaker of the content provided by others based on its allowing or not allowing certain content to be on its internet platform,” Marshall wrote. “The court refuses to do so.”

Nunes sued Twitter, the two parody accounts known as Devin Nunes’ Cow and Devin Nunes’ Mom and strategist Liz Mair in March 2019. He alleged the latter three had defamed him online, ruining his reputation and causing him to win his 2018 election by a narrower margin than normal. He accused Twitter of being negligent for allowing the alleged defamation.

Twitter’s lawyers, in their motion to dismiss the suit, argued that Twitter was immune from the lawsuit due to federal law. The law, known as Section 230, says that social media companies like Twitter are not liable for what third parties post on their platform. The only exception is if Twitter personally helped develop or create the content. Both Twitter and Nunes agreed the company did not do that in this case.

Nunes’ lawyer, Steven Biss, argued that Twitter’s actions in allegedly favoring more liberal content over conservation content and allegedly promoting tweets that made fun of Nunes meant that Section 230 protections should not apply.

Judge Marshall disagreed with Nunes and Biss’ arguments, saying previous court cases had already settled that Section 230 applies even if the company does show bias in what content it allows people to post.

yer gonna need more lawyers.....

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2020 11:47 pm
by RayThom
Devin Moones' cow sez...


Re: yer gonna need more lawyers.....

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 6:32 am
by MajGenl.Meade
And that’s exactly why I am so excited to join the honest and passionate debate at Fox News about our future.


Image